Authors
- Koverova Maria I.
Annotation
The relevance of the study of the educational organizations leaders’ professional growth and development is explained by the necessity for management teams to master
new management functions due to the digital transformation of education and the use of digital resources in the administrative systems themselves. In accordance with the aims of the study, the inquiry included synthesis, analysis and conceptualization of the experience of Moscow professional development system for educational leaders aimed at their preparation for educational innovation management. The study resulted in distinguishing and defining a new spectrum of management tasks for school leaders in the context of digital educational transformation. New responsibilities include motivating teachers to master new digital resources, individualizing educational paths, enhancing remote learning, establishing connection between compulsory and extracurricular school activities. Within the scope of the research, specific characteristics of the content, organizational forms and active methods of the educational organizations leaders’ professional growth and development were determined. The study describes a model of the professional development process for educational leaders alongside supporting measures that can be adjusted by regional educational development institutions.The research was conducted using criterion analysis of practical experience and relying on school leaders interviews and monitoring their professional efficacy during the implementation of abovementioned ongoing learning.
How to link insert
Koverova, M. I. (2022). MOSCOW EXPERIENCE IN SUPPORTING EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS LEADERS’ PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE FIELD OF DIGITAL Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 16(2), 98. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2022.16.2.06
References
1.
1. Karakose, T., Polat, H., & Papadakis, S. (2021). Examining Teachers’ Perspectives on School Principals’ Digital Leadership Roles and Technology Capabilities during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal Sustainability, 23, 13448. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su132313448
2.
2. Uvarov, I., Frumin, I. (2019). Difficulties and perspectives of education digital transformation. National Research university “Higher School of Economics”. Moscow.
3.
3. Abzalova, D. (2020). Managing school digitalization. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 4(141), 186–195.
4.
4. Pivovarov, A., & Skurikhina, J. (2017). The role of the advanced training system in the teachers’ professional growth. Scientific support of the personnel development system, 2(31), 5–13.
5.
5. Vinogradov, V. (2016). Innovative development management of modern educational organization. Humanity and Education, 3(48), 48–55.
6.
6. Rastashanskaya, T. (2012). Organization of qualification improvement courses for school heads as education modernization projects realization. Tomsk State University Journal, 358, 188–190.
7.
7. Chunina, A., Sinitsyna, D., & Konopleva, V. (2020). Digitalization in the system of educational institution management. Education Journal of Kaliningrad, 1(5), 78–83.
8.
8. Pettersson, F. (2018). Digitally Competent School Organizations — Developing Supportive Organizational Infrastructures. Seminar.net, 14, 132–143. https://doi.org/10.7577/seminar.2976
9.
9. Ignatieva, E. (2020). Pedagogical management in digital education context. Educational Technologies (Moscow), 2, 57–66.
10.
10. Sterrett, W., & Richardson, J. (2020). Supporting Professional Development Through Digital Principal Leadership. Journal of Organizational & Educational Leadership, 5. https://digitalcommons.gardner-webb.edu/joel/vol5/iss2/4 (date of accesses: 22.01.2022).
11.
11. Thannimalai, R., & Raman, A. (2018). The Influence of Principals’ Technology Leadership and Professional Development on Teachers’ Technology Integration in Secondary Schools. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 15, 201–226. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2018.15.1.8
12.
12. Nazarov, V. L., & Doliner L. I. (2020). Digital transformation of the school in a pandemic: the experience of the Sverdlovsk region. Monograph. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, Ural Federal University. the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin, Institute for the Development of Education of the Sverdlovsk Region. Yekaterinburg: Ural University Press. 170 p.
13.
13. Usova, S. (2020). Problems and opportunities of teachers’ web advanced training in the context of digitalization of education. Scientific support of the personnel development system, 1(42), 43–57.
14.
14. Lindqvist, M. (2019). School leaders’ practices for innovative use of digital technologies in schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 1226–1240. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12782
15.
15. Edwards L. R. (2020). How Principals Learn to Be Technology Leaders: A Critical Incident Qualitative Study. Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Dissertation, Educational Foundations & Leadership, Old Dominion University. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/efl_etds/233
16.
16. Baydar, F. (2022). The role of educational leaders in the development of students’ technology use and digital citizenship. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 32–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.52380/mojet.2022.10.1.367
17.
17. Agustina R., & Kamdi W. (2020). Influence of the Principal’s Digital Leadership on the Reflective Practices of Vocational Teachers Mediated by Trust, Self-Efficacy, and Work Engagement. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(11), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.11.2
18.
18. Passey, D. (2014). Intergenerational learning practices — Digital leaders in schools. Educ. Inf. Technol., 19, 473–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9322-z
19.
19. Petry, T. (2018). Digital Leadership. In: North, K., Maier, R., Haas, O. (Eds.), Knowledge Management in Digital Change (pp. 209–218). Series “Progress in IS”. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73546-7_12
20.
20. Tambovtseva, E. (2015). Problems of professional motivation of teachers. Journal of Experimental Education, 2(2), 33–39.
21.
21. Novikova, O., & Remennikov, V. (2019). Educational organization management in the context of digitalization and globalization of the economy. Young Scientists Journal, 22(260), 564–565.
22.
22. Dygodyuk, N., & Smirnova, E. (2016). Project activity at school. Scientific Conference Journal, 5-4(9), 110–111.
23.
23. Fayazova, A. (2013). Project studio as the way of individual process to improve the teacher’s skill. School Technology, 5, 44–52.
24.
24. Zhong, L. (2017). Indicators of Digital Leadership in the Context of K-12 Education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 10, 27–40. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.1001.03
25.
25. Ivanova, M. (2019). Management project as an instrument to manage the development of school. Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education, 62(3), 92–96.