Authors
- Alisov Evgenii А. Doctor of Pedagogy, Professor
Annotation
The prerequisites of this study, which determined its relevance, are diverse manifestations of the digitalization trend, affecting the system of higher pedagogical
education, including its methodological basis. The purpose of the article is to identify and characterize in the context of the activity approach the content of the planned directions for including the system of training teachers in solving the problems of digital transformation of the economy and public life. The article examines the specifics of the influence of the features of the modern stage of digital transformation on the field of higher education. A detailed description of the essential filling of epistemic spaces of the activity approach is given: paradigms, syntagms and pragmatics, taking into account the specifics of the university training of teachers. As key landmarks of modern higher pedagogical education, in the perspective of the activity approach, they are indicated: a targeted attitude to activities of continuous professional self-improvement, meaningful preparation for solving life problems, personalization of the educational environment of the university, organization of joint network activities. The application of the activity approach is correlated with the educational results normatively fixed in the standards. The principles of the system-modular organization of higher pedagogical education are updated: the principle of the humanistic nature of education, the principle of the unity of theory and practice, the principle of cognizability, the principle of objectivity. The relationship of the proclaimed installations for the modernization of the higher pedagogical education system with the private manifestations of the digital transformation process is traced. Based on the generalization and systematization of a number of theoretical and empirical scientific and pedagogical studies, it is concluded that it is necessary to maintain the active basis in the practice of implementing educational programs of higher pedagogical education, with the introduction of innovations in it that meet the general trends in the spread of digital technologies around the world.
How to link insert
Alisov, E. А. (2022). DIGITAL CIRCUITS OF HIGHER PEDAGOGICAL EDUCATION IN THE VIEW OF ACTIVITY APPROACH Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 16(4), 48. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2022.16.4.03
References
1.
1. ITU (2019). Digital transformation and the role of enterprise architecture. https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-d/opb/str/D-STR-DIG_TRANSF-2019-PDF-E.pdf
2.
2. Abdrahmanova, G. I., Byhovskij, K. B., Veselitskaya, N. N., Vishnevskij, K. O., Gohberg, L. M. et al. (2021). Digital transformation of industries: starting conditions and priorities. Moscow: Publishing House of HSE University. (In Russ.). https://conf.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/463148459.pdf
3.
3. Shen, C., & Ho, J. (2020). Technology-enhanced learning in higher education: A bibliometric analysis with latent semantic approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106177
4.
4. Guzman, J. H. E., Zuluaga-Ortiz, R. A., Barrios-Miranda, D. A., & Delahoz-Dominguez, E. J. (2022). Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)
in the processes of distribution and use of knowledge in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), Procedia Computer Science, 198, 644–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.300
5.
5. Zhang, Z. (2022). Application of digital intelligent communication technology in contemporary comparative education methodology. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 61, 6, 4647–4657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.10.019
6.
6. Kiseleva, L. S., & Semenova, А. А. (2018). Digital transformation of society: trends and prospects. The problems of scientist and scientific groups activity, 4(34), 157–169. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_36809544_82843148.pdf
7.
7. Boulton, C. A., Kent, C., & Williams H. T. P. (2018). Virtual learning environment engagement and learning outcomes at a ‘bricks-and-mortar’ university. Computers & Education, 126, 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.031
8.
8. Kaltheuner, N.-E. (2018). The virtual university European Heart Journal, 39(8), 645–648. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy041
9.
9. Batara, C., & Rapat, C. (2020). Design and implementation of virtual university based on ICT. International Journal of Research – Granthaalayah, 8, 144–152. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v8.i4.2020.19
10.
10. Mendez Reguera, E. A., & Lopez, M. (2021). Using a digital whiteboard for student engagement in distance education. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107268
11.
11. Tang, C., Mao, S., Naumann, S. E., & Xing, Z. (2022). Improving student creativity through digital technology products: A literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101032
12.
12. Horng, J.-S., Liu, C.-H., Chou, S.-F., Yu, T.-Y., Fang, Y.-P., & Huang, Y.-C. (2022). Student’s perceptions of sharing platforms and digital learning for sustainable behaviour and value changes. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2022.100380
13.
13. Smirnov, I. (2019). Future vocational education: network paradigm of Professor M. Nikitin. Professional Education in Russia and Abroad, 1, 178–184. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_37273466_26851327.pdf
14.
14. Novikova, I. А., Bychkova, P. А., & Novikov, А. L. (2019). University students’ attitudes towards digital educational technologies before and after outbreak of COVID–19 pandemic. Values and Meanings, 2, 23–44. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_45842665_48449075.pdf
15.
15. Hutain, J., & Michinov, N. (2022). Improving student engagement during in-person classes by using functionalities of a digital learning environment. Computers & Education, 183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104496
16.
16. Minina, V. N. (2020). Digitalization of higher education and its social outcomes. Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg University. Sociology, 13(1), 84–101. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu12.2020.106
17.
17. Vostrecova, E. V. (2019). Basics of Information Security. Ekaterinburg: Ural Federal University. (In Russ.). https://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/73899/3/978-5-7996-2677-8_2019.pdf
18.
18. Savina, N. V. (2020). Methodological foundations of personalized learning. The Science of Person: Humanitarian Researches, 14(4), 82–90. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_44577849_43108346.pdf
19.
19. Mishra, P. (2019). Considering Contextual Knowledge: The TACK Diagram Gets an Upgrade. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, April. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1588611
20.
20. Аlisov, Е. А., Miklyaeva, N. V., Marinyuk, A. A., & Yakusheva, S. D. (2013). Regularities and principles of organizing territorial (multi-level) educational complexes. MCU Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology, 2(24), 24–31. (In Russ.). https://www.mgpu.ru/uploads/adv_documents/2834/1485949182-Vestnik2(24)2013PedagogikaIPsihologiya.pdf
21.
21. Medvedev, A. M., & Zhulanova, I. V. (2021). Activity approach as a guideline of modern education: initial content and risks of reduction. World of Science. Pedagogy and psychology, 2(9). (In Russ.). https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/20PSMN221.pdf
22.
22. Walker, L., & Warfa, A. M. (2017). Process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) marginally effects student achievement measures but substantially increases the odds of passing a course. PLoS One, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186203
23.
23. Savenkov, A. I., Alisov, E. A., & Lvova, A. S. (2015). Modular creation of educational programs in baccalaureate and magistracy of the direction of preparation «Pedagogical education». MCU Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology, 1(31), 18–26. (In Russ.). https://www.mgpu.ru/uploads/adv_documents/2841/1485949379-VestnikPedagogikaIPsihologiya1(31)2015.pdf
24.
24. Margolis, A. A. (2021). Activity Approach in Teacher Education. Psychological Science and Education, 26(3), 5–39. (In Russ.). https://psyjournals.ru/files/121202/pse_2021_n3_Margolis.pdf
25.
25. Gushchin, A. V. (2017). Organizational and pedagogical conditions for the effective development of the electronic information and educational environment of a higher educational organization. Scientific review. Pedagogical sciences, 5, 34–41. (In Russ.). https://science-pedagogy.ru/ru/article/view?id=1664