Authors
- Ryzhov Alexey N. Doctor of Education Sciences, Associate Professor
Annotation
The pedagogical model presented in the article reflects proposals for the diversification of the conceptual ideas of the activity-based approach and changes in the training of students in higher pedagogical education. The conceptual ideas underlying the model can be summarized as follows: in the implementation of the activity-based approach, it is important to take into account the main components of activity as a psychological phenomenon; the activity principle in teacher training is fundamental for the development of basic competencies of this training; the future teacher will be able to more successfully teach students on an activity basis if her training is also activity-based. The digitalization of education is not an obstacle to the implementation of the activity-based approach, moreover, it opens up new opportunities for teacher training to implement it.
How to link insert
Ryzhov, A. N. (2024). A MODEL FOR DIVERSIFYING THE CONTENT OF THE STUDENT TRAINING PROCESS BASED ON AN ACTIVITY-BASED APPROACH IN HIGHER PEDAGOGICAL EDUCATION IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF SOCIETY Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 18 (1-2), 26. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2024.18.1-2.09
References
1.
1. Lomakina, T. Y. (2001). Diversification of basic vocational education. Thesis of dissertation of Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences on specialty 13.00.01. Kazan. 37 p. (In Russ.).
2.
2. Dubinina, V. L. (2010). Pedagogical readiness of teacher-researcher to diagnostic-technological activity in the conditions of education diversification (in the system of university-internship). Thesis of dissertation of Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences on specialty 13.00.01 — general pedagogy, history of pedagogy and education. Kazan, 38. (In Russ.).
3.
3. Gevorkyan, E. N., Savenkov, A. I., Lvova, A. S., & Nikitina, E. K. (1983). Minivideo-lecture and cognitive dialogue as tools for modernization of learning activity. Pedagogika, 87(3), 5–15. (In Russ.). http://pedagogika-rao.ru/journals/2023/03/
4.
4. Leontiev, A. N. (1977). Activity. Consciousness. Personality. Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russ.).
5.
5. Leontiev, A. N. (1983). Analysis of activity. Transcript of lectures in LSPU. Vestnik MSU. Series 14. Psychology, (2), 5–17. (In Russ.).
6.
6. Rubinstein, S. L. (1986). Principle of creative amateurism. Voprosy psychologii, (4), 101–109. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Asmolov, A. G. (2012). System-activity approach to the development of new generation standards. Pedagogy, (3), 18–22. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Davydov, V. V. (1990) On the place of the category of activity in modern theoretical psychology. In: Kasavin, I. T. (Comp.). Activity: theory, methodology, problems. Сollection (pp. 143–156). Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russ.).
9.
9. Davydov, V. V., & Leontiev, D. A. (Eds.) (1990). The Activity Approach in Psychology: Problems and Prospects. Moscow: APN USSR. (In Russ.).
10.
10. Abulkhanova-Slavskaya, K. А. (1980). Activity and personality psychology. Moscow: Nauka. 334 p. (In Russ.).
11.
11. Kasavin, I. T. (Comp.). (1990). Activity: theories, methodology, problems. Сollection. Moscow: Politizdat. 365 p. (In Russ.).
12.
12. Margolis, A. A. (2021). Activity approach in pedagogical education. Psychological science and education, 26(3), 5–39. (In Russ.). https://psyjournals.ru/files/121202/pse_2021_n3_Margolis.pdf
13.
13. Bogoslovskaya, O. V. (2006). Activity approach to teaching in higher education and problems of professional activity of a teacher. Moscow: Izd.RUDN. 71 p. (In Russ.).
14.
14. Medvedev, A. M., & Zhulanova, I. V. (2021). Activity approach as a reference point of modern education: initial content and risks of reduction. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 2(9). (In Russ.). https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/20PSMN221.pdf
15.
15. Sosnin, N. V. (2011). The content of training in the competence model of VPO. Monograph. Krasnoyarsk: SFU. 240 p. (In Russ.).
16.
16. Savenkov, A. I., Alisov, E. A., & Lvova, A. S. (2015). Modular construction of educational programs in bachelor’s and master’s degree programs of training direction “Pedagogical Education”. MCU Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology, 1(31), 18–26. (In Russ.).
https://www.mgpu.ru/uploads/adv_documents/2841/1485949379-VestnikPedagogikaIPsihologiya1(31)2015.Pdf
17.
17. Lvova, A. S., & Kaitov, A. P. (2023). Formation of professional identity of students of pedagogical master’s degree in the conditions of system-modular organization of educational process. Psychological and pedagogical journal Gaudeamus, 22(2), 81–92. (In Russ.).
18.
18. Alisov, E. A. (2022). Digital contours of higher pedagogical education in the perspective of the activity approach. MCU Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology, 16(4), 48–66. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2022.16.4.03
19.
19. Savenkov, A. I. (2023). Digitalization of education as a catalyst for changes in the pedagogy profession. Izvestia institute of pedagogy and psychology of education, (2), 4–11. (In Russ.). http://izvestia-ippo.ru/
20.
20. Gevorkyan E. N., & Savenkov A. I. (2023). Innovative practices of training future teachers in pedagogical university. In: Gevorkyan, E. N., Podufalov, N. D., & Strikhanov, M. N. (Comp.). Innovative processes in higher and secondary professional education and professional self-determination. The collective monograph (pp. 346–358). Moscow: Econ-Inform. (In Russ.).