Authors
- Topchiy Irina Vladimirovna PhD in Architecture
Annotation
The article is devoted to the study of the content inversion`s mechanisms and methods of future architect`s training, taking place in processes of interdisciplinary and public communications. Based on the idea of increasing the competitiveness of graduates, the introduction of new methods, forms, and content of architectural activities in vocational education. To achieve the goals, use the content analysis of scientific literature of Russian and foreign authors, official Internet sites of the educational organization, comparative analysis of the methods of subjective, subjective-object, network and ecosystem interaction in architecture learning. The results of this study allow to draw conclusions about the dependence of inversive educational practices on the choice of «territories» of communications, different compositions of subjects and objects of communication, goals of communication and motivation of participants, cultural, innovative technological potential of objects of communications. The mental and physical educational environments of universities limit inverse processes to the interdisciplinary knowledge field of the university. inversive practice can be considered as the result of interdisciplinary scientific and educational cooperation of representatives of the academic society. The network interaction in the open information and physical space of the city allows to carry out an inversion of design competences of future architects in the process of pre-project research and attraction
to them of future users. Inverse practices use life experience and professional qualifications of external experts — subjects of communication. Educational ecosystems in the urban space are formed around a specific architectural object and problems concentrated in it, are built on the subjective and subjective and object communications of subjects. The result of cognitive process with their participation is supported by case-technologies and allows to carry out a system inversion of all the existing competences.
How to link insert
Topchiy, I. V. (2022). DEVELOPMENT OF INVERSIVE PRACTICES IN ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION UNDER CONDITIONS OF SUBJECT-SUBJECT AND SUBJECT-OBJECT COMMUNICATIONS Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 16(3), 172. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2022.16.3.10
References
1.
1. Savransky, S. D. (2000). Engineering of Creativity: Introduction to TRIZ Methodology of Inventive Problem Solving. 1st ed. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420038958
2.
2. Masters, K. (2021). Peer Review Report For: The online inverted classroom model (oICM). A blueprint to adapt the inverted classroom to an online learning setting in medical and health education (version 2). MedEdPublish NaN, 9 (113). https://doi.org/10.21956/mep.20270.r31464
3.
3. Ivanova, S. V., & Ivanov, O. B. (2020). Educational space as modus of educational policy. Monograph. Moscow: Russkoye Slovo. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Osmolovskaya, I. M. (2020). Didactics: from classics to modernity. Monograph (pp. 152–157). Moscow; St. Petersburg: Nestor-History. (In Russ.).
5.
5. Mukhametzyanov, I. Sh. (2019). Digital space in education: expectations, opportunities, risks, threats. Russia: trends and prospects for development. In Gerasimov, V. I. (Ed.). Yearbook. Proceedings of the XIX National Scientific Conference with international participation, 2019, December 18–19 (pp. 571–574). Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow. (In Russ.).
6.
6. Perminova, L. M. (2020). Digital education: expectations, opportunities, risks. Pedagogy, 3, 28–37. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Topchiy, I. V. (2020). Enhancing the communicative competence of the architects in the process of public and professional engagements. Values and meanings, 3, 88–106. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2071-6427-2020-10026
8.
8. Serikov, V. V. (2018). Specificity of didactic reasoning of learning. Pedagogical Journal of Bashkortostan, 5 (78), 12–19. (In Russ.).
9.
9. Panov, V. I. (2017). From environmental psychology to subject-medium interactions. In Mdivani, M. O. (Ed.). Subject-medium interactions: an ecopsychological approach to the development of the psyche. Collective monograph (pp. 7–14). Moscow: Pero. https://www.pirao.ru/upload/iblock/375/ekopodkhod.pdf (In Russ.).
10.
10. Colomina, B., Galàn, I. G., Kotsioris, E., & Meister, A.-M. (2022, May 31). Radical Pedagogies. Published: May 31, 2022. 416 p.
11.
11. Weise, S., Wilson A., & Vigar, G. (2020). Reflections on Deploying Community-Driven Visualisations for Public Engagement in Urban Planning. Urban Planning, 5 (2), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v5i2.3008
12.
12. Podboltova, M. I., & Reznikova, R. A. (2020). Cognitive and Activity-Based Educational Practices of the City: Cases of Moscow. In Vachkova, S. N. (Ed.). Education and the City: co-design practices. Collection of articles based on the results of the Second Annual International Symposium (pp. 71–78). Moscow City University. Moscow. (In Russ.).
13.
13. Fominykh, N. Y., Koikova, E. I., & Bubenchikova, A. V. (2021). Educational environment as an ecosystem. World of Science, Culture, Education, 3 (88), 292–294. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/1991-5497-2021-388-292-294
14.
14. Fedorov, I. M. (2019). Transition from educational environment to educational ecosystem. Young Scientist, 28 (266), 246–250. (In Russ.).
15.
15. Lind, J., Malmqvist, T., Wangel, J., & Belkert, Ann-K. (2017). Citylab Action: Guiding Sustainable Urban Development. Conference: World Sustainable Built Environment Conference 2017 Hong Kong.
16.
16. Hansen, L. A., & Wass, S. (2022). Enactive methods towards situational learning — engaging people with intellectual and developmental disability in design. Procedia Computer Science, 196, 598–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.054
17.
17. Malecha, M. J. (1988). Architectural education. Ekistics, 55 (328/329/330), 121–132. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43622063
18.
18. Orchowska, M. M. (2021). Adaptive architecture — the design of exhibition building at ul. Hoża. Diplom tipe. Master of Sience. Warsaw University of Technology.
19.
19. Jaiswal, A., Lyon, J. A., Zhang, Y., & Magana, A. J. (2021). Supporting student reflective practices through modelling-based learning assignments. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46 (6), 987–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1952164
20.
20. Antoniadou-Plytaria, K., Srivastava, A., Ghazvini, M. A. F., Steen, D., Tuan, L. A. & Carlson, O. (2019). Chalmers Campus as a Testbed for Intelligent Grids and Local Energy Systems. 2019 International Conference on Smart Energy Systems and Technologies (SEST), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEST.2019.8849014