Authors
- Krasheninnikov Evgeniy Evgenevich PhD in Psychology
- Krasheninnikov-Hait Evgeniy Evgenievich
Annotation
The article is devoted to the modern practice of assessing the ability of students to solve problem situations. The article provides a brief overview of Russian, Kazakh and international (PISA) studies. It allows you to determine the grounds on which the criteria for effective assessment can be based, to identify the potential of such an assessment for the development of students and predict their academic performance, as well as to determine the difficulties that arise when introducing criteria-level assessment in the educational process.
How to link insert
Krasheninnikov, E. E. & Krasheninnikov-Hait, E. E. (2021). Possibilities of Using Criterial and Level Assessment of the Ability to Solve Problem Situations Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 1 (55), 8-23. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2021.55.1.02
References
1.
Ambrosova N. V. Texnologiya kriterial`nogo ocenivaniya // Sovremenny`e tendencii organizacii obrazovatel`nogo processa: ot idei k rezul`tatu: mat-ly` III Vseros. nauch.- prakt. konf. (g. Cheboksary`, 26 fevralya 2019 g.). Cheboksary`, 2019. S. 12–16.
2.
Belova N. N. O neobxodimosti kriterial`nogo ocenivaniya // Nauka i obrazovanie. Michurinsk: Michurinskij gosudarstvenny`j agrarny`j universitet, 2019. T. 2. No 4. S. 19.
3.
Gal`chenko I. V. Kriterial`noe ocenivanie: problemy` i puti ix resheniya // Pedagogicheskaya nauka i praktika. 2020. No 1 (27). S. 86–90.
4.
Nurgalieva M. A. Prakticheskaya znachimost` kriterial`nogo ocenivaniya // Pedagogicheskaya nauka i praktika. 2018. No 1 (19). S. 115–117.
5.
Podd`yakov A. Reshenie kompleksny`x problem v PISA-2012 i PISA-2015: vzaimodejstvie so slozhnoj real`nost`yu // Obrazovatel`naya politika. No 6. 2012. S. 34–53.
6.
Romanova A. V. Kriterial`no-urovnevoe ocenivanie umenij mladshix shkol`nikov reshat` problemy` poiskovogo xaraktera v proektnoj deyatel`nosti // Vy`sshee obrazovanie dlya XXI veka (Moskva, 14–16 dekabrya 2017 g.): problemy` vospitaniya: doklady` i materialy` XIV Mezhdunar. nauch. konf.: v 2 ch. 2017. S. 77–82.
7.
Stupniczkaya M. A. Kriterial`noe ocenivanie // Pedagogicheskie izmereniya. 2015. No 1. S. 52–74.
8.
Greiff S., Fischer A. Der Nutzen einer komplexen Problemlösekompetenz: Theoretische Überlegungen und empirische Befunde [Usefulness of complex problem-solving competency: Theoretical considerations and empirical results] // Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie. 2013. 27 (1). P. 1–13.
9.
Greiff S., Wüstenberg S., Funke J. Dynamic problem solving: A new assessment perspective // Applied Psychological Measurement. 2012. 36(3). P. 189–213.
10.
Greiff S., Holt D. V., Funke J. Perspectives on problem solving in educational assessment: analytical, interactive, and collaborative problem solving // The Journal of Problem Solving. 2013. V. 5. P. 71–91.
11.
Griffin P., McGaw B., Care E. Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills // Springer. 2011. 310 p.
12.
Leutner D., Fleischer J., Wirth J., Greiff S., Funke J. Analytische und dynamische Problemlösekompetenz im Lichte internationaler Schulleistungsvergleichsstudien. [Analytical and dynamic problem solving from an international educational studies perspective] // Psychologische Rundschau. 2012. No 63. P. 34–42.
13.
OECD. PISA 2012. Assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy // OECD. 2010. P. 119–139.
14.
OECD. PISA 2015. Field trial collaborative problem solving framework // Presented at the 33rd PISA Governing Board meeting in Talinn, Estonia. OECD. 2012. P. 131–188.
15.
Wüstenberg S., Greiff S., Funke J. Complex problem solving: More than reasoning? // Intelligence. 2012. 40 (1). P. 1–14.