Home Releases № 3 (57)

The impact of pedagogical technology of motivational development onto value self-determination of students with the high level of leader’s potential

Psychology , UDC: 37.032.5 DOI: 10.25688/2076-9121.2021.57.3.08

Authors

  • Oshchepkov Aleksey Alexandrovich PhD in Psychology
  • Rerke Victoriaya Igorevna PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor
  • Friauf Vladimir Vladimirovich

Annotation

Abstract. The relevance of the study is caused by the need to cultivate in the growing generation the leader's abilities, important for modern society with its challenges to profes­sional's personality who is able to initiative and responsibility. Modern tendencies of so­ciety development are expressed in transit from traditional systems of knowledge transfer to modern complex approaches to development of personality of future specialists. To solve complicated problems of modern society critical and creative thinking together with ability of cooperative problem solving is required. Along with this, it is worth considering the fact that human activity, in particular educational and professional, is encapsulated with its va­lues system, that increases the role of value-based approach in the frames of educational process of professional development. With the relation to it, the given article is directed to study the impact of pedagogical conditions onto values orientations system of young generation. The leading method of the problem is pedagogical experiment, which allowed to reveal the dynamics of youth's values in the conditions of pedagogical processб aug­mented with the pedagogical program of motivational development. In the frameworks of the given program the life ways, the significant people involved in the life situations of young people were studied that allowed us to reveal the main values constructs orienting young people in the relations to self, to surroundings, to society and to the world generally. In the work it is revealed, that the youth's orientation to achievements and social relations let them develop leader's abilities. The presented in the article materials allow us enrich the pedagogical process, directed to develop initiative and responsible personality.

How to link insert

Oshchepkov, A. A., Rerke, V. I. & Friauf, V. V. (2021). The impact of pedagogical technology of motivational development onto value self-determination of students with the high level of leader’s potential Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 3 (57), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2021.57.3.08
References
1. Avdeenko, N. A., Denishcheva, L. O., Krasnoyarskaya, K. A., Mihajlova, A. M., Pinskaya, M. A., & Rydze, O. A. (2021). Skills of the XXI century: how to shape and evaluate in the lesson? [Navyki XXI veka: kak formirovat' i otsenivat' na uroke? / N. A. Avdeenko i dr.] Obrazovatel'naya politika [Obrazovatel'naia politika]. (In Russian). URL: https://edpolicy.ru/form-and-evaluate
2. Asmolov, A. G. (2018). Mobile in mobile [Podvizhnyi vpodvizhnom]. In: Asmolov, A. G. (Ed.). Mobilis in Mobile: lichnost' v epohu peremen [Mobilis in mobile: lichnost' v epokhu peremen /pod obshch. red. A. G. Asmolova]. Moskva, Rossiia: IaSK, 546, 9-28. (In Russian).
3. Baburova, N. B. (2020). Leader vs victim: formation of victim behavior in the lea­der through persecution [Lider vs zhertva: formirovanie viktimnogo povedeniia u lidera posredstvom gonenii]. Bulletin of Mscow State Regional University [Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta], 3, 121-133. (In Russian).
4. Bell, R. C. (2003). The repertory grid technique. In: Fransella F. (Ed.). International handbook of personal construct psychology, 95-103. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. DOI: 10.1002/0470013370.ch9
5. Belov, V. V. (2016). Acmeological approach to study organization's leader personality [Akmeologicheskii podkhod k issledovaniiu lichnosti lidera organizatsii]. Psychology of XXI century: Theory and Practice of Modern Psychology: Materials of XI Inter­national science-practical conference of young scientists [Psikhologiia XXI veka. Teoriia ipraktika sovremennoipsikhologii: mat-lyXIMezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. molodykh uchenykh], 106-109. (In Russian). Sankt-Peterburg, Rossiia: Leningrad State University in the name of A. S. Pushkin [Leningradskii gosudarstvennyi univer­sitet im. A. S. Pushkina].
6. Bothner, M. S., Kim, Y. K., & Lee, W. (2015). Primary status, complementary sta­tus, and organizational survival in the US venture capital industry. Social Science Research, 52, 588-601. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.03.010
7. Care, E., Kim, H., Vista, A., & Anderson, K. (2018). Education System Alignment for 21st century skills. Focus on Assessment. Brookings institution, 2018. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/research/education-system-alignment-for-21st-century-skills/
8. Glaveanu, V. P., & Tanggaard, L. (2014). Creativity, identity, and representation: Towards a socio-cultural theory of creative identity. New Ideas in Psychology, 34, 12-21. DOI: 10/1016/j.newideapsych.2014.02.002
9. Harding, J. (1952). Sociometry, experimental method and the science of society: An approach to a new political orientation. Psychological Bulletin, 49 (3), 283-284. DOI: 10.1037/h0049709
10. Henriksen, D. (2021). Creativity and risk-taking in teaching and learning settings: Insights from six international narratives. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2 (2), 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100024
11. Iadov, V. A. (2013). Self-regulation and predicting ofpersonality's social behavior: Dis­positional Conception [Samoreguljacija i prognozirovanie social'nogo povedenija lichnosti: dispozicionnaja koncepcija]. Moskva, Rossiia: TsSPiM. (In Russian).
12. Kamenskaia, V. G., & Kuskov, A. A. (2016). Constitutional and Intellectual factors of leader's self-determination in youth group [Konstitutsional'nye i intellektual'nye faktory samoopredeleniia lidera v molodezhnoi gruppe]. Progress of modern scien­ce and education [Uspekhi sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniia], 4, 10, 156-159. (In Russian).
13. Krivoruchko, M. V. (2009). Impact of attitudes to leading political patries and to their leaders onto the shapes of ideal and typical leaders [Vliianie ustanovok k vedushchim politicheskim partiiam i ikh lideram na obrazy ideal'nogo i tipichnogo liderov]. Herald of Omsk University. Series «Psychology» [Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriia: Psikhologiia], 1, 36-47. (In Russian).
14. Kriukova, N. A., Basov, O. N., & Maliarova, N. A. (2016). Methodological bases of young leaders training [Metodologicheskie osnovy podgotovki molodykh liderov: kompetentnostnyi podkhod]. Clasters. Researche and Development [Klastery. Issle-dovaniia i razrabotki], 2, 3-4, 19-26. (In Russian). Retrieved from https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27700538
15. Mink, O., Rogers, R., & Watkins, K. (1989). Creative leadership: discovering para­doxes of innovation and risk. Contemporary educational psychology, 14, 3, 228-240. DOI: 10.1016/0361-476x(89)90012-x
16. Oshchepkov, A. A., Salakhova, V. B., & Friauf, V. V. (2020). Review of empirical studies of pedagogical conditions of preparing leaders among youth [Obzor empiricheskikh issledovanii pedagogicheskikh uslovii podgotovki liderov v molodezhnoi srede]. Personality Formation [Obrazovanie lichnosti], 1-2, 82-87. (In Russian).
17. Oshchepkov, A. A., & Friauf, V. V. (2020). Study of dynamics of value systems of youth's leaders under pedagogical conditions of value-motivational development [Issledovanie dinamiki sistemy cennostej molodezhnyh liderov v pedagogicheskih uslovijah cennostno-motivacionnogo razvitija]. 'Alma mater' Bulletin of the Higher School [Vestnik vysshej shkoly], 10, 23-27. (In Russian).
18. Oshchepkov, A. A. , & Friauf, V. V. (2020). Pedagogical conditions for the formation of the system of values of young people with high level of leadership potential [Pedagogicheskie uslovija formirovanija sistemy cennostej molodezhi s vysokim urovnem liderskogo potenciala]. Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University. Series: Pedagogics [VestnikMoskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Serija: Pedagogika], 2, 31-38. (In Russian).
19. Purvis, A. J., Rodgers, H. M., & Beckingham, S. (2020). Experiences and perspectives of social media in learning and teaching in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100018
20. Ravenette, T. (2005). Constructive intervention when children are presented as problems. International handbook of personal construct theory, 283-293. DOI: 10.1002/ 0470013370.ch28
21. Savva, L. I., & Gasanenko, E. A. (2015). Professional image of the student of techni­cal university [Professional'nyj imidzh studenta]. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University [Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta], 2, 170-177. (In Russian).
22. Schwartz, S. H. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Perso­nality and social psychology, 103, 663-688. DOI: 10.1037/a0029393
23. Shapovalova, P. V., & Atrakhimovich, P. E. (2017). Philosophy of leadership in socio­logical section [Filosofija liderstva v sociologicheskom sreze: ot menedzhera k lideru]. Academic science — problems and achievements: Materials of XIIInternational scientific-practical conference [Akademicheskaja nauka — problemy i dostizhenija: mat-ly XIIMezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. Severnyj Charl'ston, SShA], 85-87. Northern Charlston, USA.
24. Vershinina, T. S., Ilyushkina, M. Y. (2020). Social practices of advertising disclosure: influence of stylistic expressive means of forming value orientations. Russian Linguis­tic Bulletin, 3 (23), 94-101.
Download file .pdf 370.48 kb