Home страница Archive PHYSICAL SIDE OF MENTAL DEVELOPMENT IN SYNDROME FORMATION AND DYSONTOGENESIS CORRECTION

PHYSICAL SIDE OF MENTAL DEVELOPMENT IN SYNDROME FORMATION AND DYSONTOGENESIS CORRECTION

Special Pedagogy and Special Psychology , UDC: 159.98 DOI: 10.25688/2076-9121.2021.58.4.11

Authors

  • Kogan Boris M. Professor, Doctor of Biology Sciences
  • Zhakov Dmitry A.

Annotation

The relevance of the research problem is due to the growing contradiction between the theoretical recognition of the significance of the physical side of mental development and the practical unrealization of this position in correctional psychology, prerequisites for the study. In the practice of a correctional psychologist, cases associated with a lack of motor development are extremely common. In this regard, this article is aimed at identifying the influence of the physical component of mental development on speech formation in preschool children. The leading methods in the study of this problem were observation and questionnaire methods, which made it possible to identify the current level of speech development of the child and qualitatively characterize the features of the motor sphere of development. The study sample included fifteen subjects aged 3 to 4,5 years with various speech disorders. The article theoretically justified the provision on the connection of psychomotor development and the development of higher mental functions (on the example of speech development), empirically proved the effectiveness of correction methods focused on the facilitation of motor development in the correction of speech disorders. The materials presented in the article make it possible to confirm the influence of the motor component of mental development on the formation of the speech child’s.
References
1. 1. Semenovich, A. V. (2007). Neuropsychological correction in childhood: replacement ontogenesis method: Textbook. Moscow: Genesis. ISBN 5-98563-072-2. (In Russ.).
2. 2. Luria, A. R. (2019). Higher cortical functions of man. Saint Petersburg: Peter. ISBN: 978-5-4461-0836-7. (In Russ.).
3. 3. Zavershneva, E., & Rene van der Veer (Eds.) (2017). Notebooks of L. S. Vygotsky. Chosen. Moscow: Canon + ROOI “Rehabilitation”. ISBN 978-5-88373-064-0. (In Russ.).
4. 4. Anokhin, P. K. (2012). Essays on the physiology of functional systems. Moscow: Book on demand. (In Russ.).
5. 5. Bernstein, N. A. (2017). Selected works on biomechanics and cybernetics. Moscow: SportAkademPress. (In Russ.).
6. 6. Sechenov, I. M. (2019). Brain reflexes: an attempt to reduce the way of origin of mental phenomena to physiological foundations (with the biography of I. M. Sechenov). Moscow: LENAND. (In Russ.).
7. 7. Goddard, S. (2019). Methods for assessing and correcting a child’s cognitive abilities. On the relationship between neonatal reflexes and learning and behavioral skills development disorders. Moscow: Academy of Medical Kinesiology and Manual Therapy. (In Russ.).
8. 8. Vasilyeva, L. F., & Krasheninnikov, V. L. (2017). Vegetative reflexes (primitive, unconditional) in pediatrics and gerontology. Moscow: Academy of Medical Kinesiology and Manual Therapy. ISBN: 978-5-93369-356-7. (In Russ.).
9. 9. Zeitlin, S. N. (2021). Language and child. Mastering the child’s native language. Moscow: Vlados. (In Russ.).
10. 10. Verevkin, A. S. (2019, May 20). Use of kinesioteipation in eliminating speech disorders in children. Electronic collection of articles based on the materials of the LXXVII Student International Scientific and Practical Conference “Scientific community of students of the XXI century. Humanitarian science” (pp. 41–45). Novosibirsk: Association of Researchers “Sibirskaja akademicheskaja kniga”. (In Russ.).
11. 11. Glozman, J. M., Potanina, A. Yu., & Soboleva, A. E. (2008). Neuropsychological diagnosis in preschool age. Saint Petersburg: Peter. ISBN: 978-5-388-00442-0. (In Russ.).
12. 12. Goryacheva, T., & Misochenko, M. (2015). Interim results of neuropsychological analysis of the development of children with perinatal risks. Pediatr (Sankt-Peterburg), Clinical psychology, 6(4), 90–96. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17816/PED6490-96
13. 13. Platokhina, N. A., & Abashina, N. N. (2018). Psychological and pedagogical approach to accompanying students with delayed speech development in the context of digitalization. Scientific and methodological electronic journal concept, 21(1), 73–83. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2304-120X-2018-11085
14. 14. Choban-Piletskaya, A. M. (2019). Features of the use of kinesiology exercises in working with preschool children with mental retardation. Trends in the development of science and education, 54(3), 85–88. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18411/lj-09-2019-70
15. 15. Bemhardsson, S., Samsson, K. S., Johansson, K., Öberg, B., & Larsson, M. E. H. (2019). A preference for dialogue: exploring the influence of patient preferences on clinical decision making and treatment in primary care physiotherapy. European Journal of Physiotherapy, 21(2), 107–114. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2018.1496474
16. 16. Blythe, S. The physicality of learning (2012). Early Years Educator, 14, 14–16. https://doi.org/10.12968/eyed.2012.14.1.14
17. 17. Cameron, A., Shackleford, P., Ortego, L., & Roy, V. (2017). Flood Trauma Survival and Recovery Using MNRI Reflex Neuro-Integration Therapy. International Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 5(6), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-9096.1000439
18. 18. Dodd, B., Ttofary-Eecen, K., Brommeyer, K., Ng, K., Reilly, S., & Morgan, A. (2017). Delayed and disordered development of articulation and phonology between four and seven years. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 34(2), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659017735958
19. 19. Fox A.V., Dodd, B., & Howard, D. (2002, April – June). Risk factors for speech disorders in children. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 37(2), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820110116776
20. 20. Gieysztor, E. Z., Choińska, A. M., & Paprocka-Borowicz, M. (2018). Persistence of primitive reflexes and associated motor problems in healthy preschool children. Archives of Medical Science, 14(1), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2016.60503
21. 21. Ihle-Hansen, H., Langhammer, B., Lydersen, S., Gunnes, M., Indredavik, B., & Askim, T. (2019). A physical activity intervention to prevent cognitive decline after stroke: secondary results from the Life After Stroke study, an 18-month randomized controlled trail. Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 51(9), 646–651. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2588
22. 22. Masgutova, S. & Shackleford, P. (2018). The Use of Restoring Resources of the Survival Roles and Reflex Patterns in MNRI (Reflex Integration) Interactive Training of Personality Growth and Interpersonal Relations. Social Psychology and Society, 8(4), 134–164. https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2017080410
23. 23. Pallesen, H., Lund, L. B., Jensen, M., & Roenn-Smidt, H. (2018). The body participating: a qualitative study of early rehabilitation participation for patients with severe brain injury and low level of consciousness. European Journal of Physiotherapy, 20(2), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2017.1347706.
24. 24. Sulltane, B., Aranit, G., & Fatlinda, S. (2017). Measuring Primitive Reflexes in Children with Learning Disorders. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles. European Center for Science Education and Research, 5(1), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejms.v5i1.p285-298
25. 25. Waring, R., Liow, S. R., Eadie, P., & Dodd, B. (2019). Speech development in preschool children: Evaluating the contribution of phonological short-Term and phonological working memory. Journal of Child Language, 46(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000919000035
26. 26. Zago, M., Condoluci, C., Pau, M., & Galli, M. (2019). Sex differences in the gait kinematics of patients with Down syndrome: A preliminary report. Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 51(1), 144–146. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2507
Download file .pdf 391.66 kb