Authors
- Smagina Maria V. PhD in Sociological Sciences, Associate Professor
- Migacheva Marina V. PhD in Sociological Sciences
- Ivashova Valentina Anatolievna PhD in Sociology, Associate Professor
Annotation
The COVID-19 pandemic has become a test of the viability and functionality of educational systems, including university education. The solution of the current tasks of transferring educational institutions of higher education to a remote work format has brought to a new level of relevance the provision of feedback from the university administration with participants in the educational process — students and teachers. Educational practices during the pandemic have undergone transformations in terms of the organization and conduct of classes, the achievement of educational results and the formation of the competence profile of students.For a pedagogical university, such a challenge and understanding of the vectors of development of pedagogical innovations are relevant not only as current practices, but also as an experience with which graduates — future teachers — will go as teachers to educational organizations in the region. The main method of collecting primary sociological information was a survey of students and teachers of the Stavropol State Pedagogical Institute through the electronic educational environment of the university 113 research and teaching staff and 1,238 students took part in the study. As a result of the study of the opinions of the pedagogical community and students, information was obtained about the organization and quality of the educational process of the pedagogical university in the conditions of a pandemic, allowing to improve the educational process.
How to link insert
Smagina, M. V., Migacheva, M. V. & Ivashova, V. A. (2022). DEVELOPMENT OF DISTANCE LEARNING AT A PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY DURING A PANDEMIC: PROBLEMS AND VECTORS OF IMPROVEMENT Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 16(2), 159. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2022.16.2.09
References
1.
References
2.
1. Sukhanova, E. A., & Frumin I. D. (2021). The quality of education in Russian universities: what we understood in the pandemic. An analytical report. Tomsk: Tomsk State University Publishing House. (In Russ.).
3.
2. Jameel, A. S., Karem, M. A., & Ahmad, A. R. (2022). Behavioral Intention to Use E-Learning Among Academic Staff During COVID-19 Pandemic Based on UTAUT Model. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 299, 187–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82616-1_17
4.
3. Laksmiwati, P. A., Adams, D., & Sulistyawati, E. (2022). Pre-service Teachers’ Readiness and Engagement for Online Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic:
A Rasch Analysis. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 299, 326–340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82616-1_29
5.
4. Mésároš, P., Smetanková, J., Mandičák, & T., Behúnová, A. (2022). Customization of BIM Educational Process During the COVID-19 Crisis at Department of Technology, Economics and Management in Construction at Faculty of Civil Engineering in Košice. EAI-Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing, 91–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67241-6_8
6.
5. Kawano, Y., & Kawano, Y. A. (2022). Proposal of Learning Feedback System for Children to Promote Self-directed Learning. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 313, 374–383.
7.
6. Boghian, I., Popescu, C.-V., & Ardeleanu, R. (2022). Responsible Online Ethical Teaching in Higher Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing, 195–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1951-9_13
8.
7. Jiang, Z., Zhu, D., Li, J., Ren, L., Pu, R., & Yang, G. (2021). Online dental teaching practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional online survey from China. BMC Oral Health, 21(1), 189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01547-7
9.
8. Lincango-Naranjo, E., Espinoza-Suarez, N., Solis-Pazmino, P., Vinueza-Moreano, P., Rodriguez-Villafuerte, S., Lincango-Naranjo, J., Barberis-Barcia, G., Ruiz-Sosa, C., Rojas-Velasco, G., Gravholt, D., Golembiewski, E., Soto-Becerra, P., Khan, M., & Ortiz-Prado, E. (2021). Paradigms about the COVID-19 pandemic: knowledge, attitudes and practices from medical students. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02559-1
10.
9. Maia, P., Justi, R., & Santos, M. (2021). Aspects About Science in the Context of Production and Communication of Knowledge of COVID-19. Science and Education, 30(3), 1–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007 / s11191-021-00229-8
11.
10. Beisland, E., Gjeilo, K. H., Andersen, J., Bråtas, O., Bø, B., Haraldstad, K., Hjelmeland, I., Iversen, M. M., Løyland, B., Norekvål, T., Riiser, K., Rohde, G., Urstad, K., Utne, I., & Flølo, T. N. (2021). Quality of life and fear of COVID-19 in 2600 baccalaureate nursing students at five universities: a cross-sectional study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19(1), 198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01837-2
12.
11. Delgado, F., Enríquez-Flores, M., & Jaimes-Nájera, A. (2021). Lessons in the use of technology for science education during covid-19 age under a teachers’ collaboration cluster. Education Sciences, 11(9), 543. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090543
13.
12. Farsi, Z., Sajadi, S. A., Afaghi, E., Fournier, A., Aliyari, Sh., Ahmadi, Y., & Hazrati, E. (2021). Explaining the experiences of nursing administrators, educators, and students about education process in the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. BMC Nursing, 20(1), 151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-0666-4
14.
Bibliographic list
15.
1. Alam, G. M., & Parvin, M. (2021). Can online higher education be an active agent for change? — comparison of academic success and job-readiness before and during COVID-19. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121008
16.
2. Almohammed, O. A., Alotaibi, L. H., & Ibn Malik, S. A. (2021). Student and educator perspectives on virtual institutional introductory pharmacy practice experience (IPPE). BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02698-5
17.
3. Başeğmez, M., & CoşkunAydın, C. (2021). The Covid-19 pandemic teaching modalities in Turkey: An evaluation of school gardens and classes. Health Policy and Technology, 10(3), 100546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2021.100546
18.
4. Bashir, A., Bashir, S., Rana, K., Lambert, P., & Vernallis, A. (2021). Post-COVID-19 Adaptations; the Shifts Towards Online Learning, Hybrid Course Delivery and the Implications for Biosciences Courses in the Higher Education Setting. Frontiers in Education, 6, 711619. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.711619
19.
5. Casacchia, M., Cifone, M. G., Giusti, L., Fabiani, L., Gatto, R., Lancia, L., Cinque, B., Petrucci, C., Giannoni, M., Ippoliti, R., Frattaroli, A. R., Macchiarelli, G.,
& Roncone, R. (2021). Distance education during COVID 19: an Italian survey on the university teachers’ perspectives and their emotional conditions. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02780-y
20.
6. Cataudella, S., Carta, S. M., Mascia, M. L., Masala, C., Petretto, D. R., Agus, M., & Penna, M. P. (2021). Teaching in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: A pilot study on teachers’ self-esteem and self-efficacy in an italian sample. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(15), 821. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158211
21.
7. Lischer S., Schmitz, S. C., Krüger, P., Safi, N., & Dickson, C. (2021). Distance Education in Social Work During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Changes and Challenges. Frontiers in Education, 6, 720565. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.720565
22.
8. Lo, C.-C., Hsieh, M.-H., Lin, H.-H., & Hung, H.-H. (2021). Influences of flipped teaching in electronics courses on students’ learning effectiveness and strategies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(18), 9748. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189748
23.
9. Margarida, R., Rui, S. R., & Franco, M. (2021). Teaching and researching in the context of covid-19: An empirical study in higher education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(16), 8718. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13168718
24.
10. Pit, S. W., Velovski, S., Cockrell, K., & Bailey, J. (2021). A qualitative exploration of medical students’ placement experiences with telehealth during COVID-19 and recommendations to prepare our future medical workforce. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02719-3
25.
11. Sârbu, M.-A., Mirea, C.-N., Mihai, M., Nistoreanu, P., & Dadfar, E. (2021). Teachers’ and Professors’ Perception of Telework in Romania. Amfiteatru Economic, 23(58), 736–751. http://dx.doi.org/10.24818/EA/2021/58/736
26.
12. Singhal, R., Kumar, A., Singh, H., Fuller, S., & Gill, S. S. (2021). Digital devicebased active learning approach using virtual community classroom during the COVID-19 pandemic. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(5), 1007–1033. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cae.22355
27.
13. Migacheva, M. V., & Ivashova, V. A. (2019). Digital competence of a modern teacher in an electronic educational environment. KANT, 2(31), 101–104. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38577644 (date of accesses: 14.01.2022). (In Russ.).