Home Releases 17(2)

PAST AND CONTEMPORARY MENTORING MODELS: POINTS OF CONVERGENCE AND DIVERGENCE IN HISTORICAL RETROSPECT

The History of Pedagogical and Psychological Education , UDC: 005.963.2 DOI: 10.25688/2076-9121.2023.17.2.09

Authors

  • Masalimova Alfiya R. Doctor of Pedagogy, Associate Professor
  • Bayanov Daniyar Ilgamovich

Annotation

The article proposed by the authors aims to identify the features of past and contemporary mentoring and to develop a classification of its models and forms based on analysis and communication of the theory and practice of contemporary mentoring activities. The research methodology for this problem is based on the analysis of studies conducted from 1970 to the present, which allowed us to present the genesis of mentoring development in 4 periods: Soviet (1970–1991) — mentoring as a form of education of working youth; post-Soviet (1991–2005) — period of mentoring stagnation; Russian (2005–2015) — period of mentoring revival; modern (2016 – present) — period of transition from form to mentoring activity. The authors, based on a synthesis of various models and types of mentoring (one-time, group, partner, reverse, situational, team, virtual mentoring, etc.) presented in domestic and international literature, proposed their classification according to the following features: by type of relationship of entities (classical, partner, reverse mentoring); by direction of activity (vector, horizontal, deficit mentoring); by time characteristics (one-time, episodic, periodic, systematic mentoring); by type of relationship of entities (classical, partner, reversible mentoring). This classification will enrich the theory of vocational education methodology and technology as well as the mentoring provisions of modern enterprises.

How to link insert

Masalimova, A. R. & Bayanov, D. I. (2023). PAST AND CONTEMPORARY MENTORING MODELS: POINTS OF CONVERGENCE AND DIVERGENCE IN HISTORICAL RETROSPECT Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 17(2), 162. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2023.17.2.09
References
1. 1. Irismetova, I. I., & Masalimova, A. R. (2022). Model and conceptual approaches to the formation of mentors’ readiness to carry out non-professional pedagogical activities. Bulletin of the Moscow State Pedagogical University. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology, 16(4), 10–25. (In Russ.).
2. 2. Irismetova, I. I., Masalimova, A. R., & Bayanov, D. I. (2022). Implementation of scientific and methodological support for the training of mentors in the conditions of modern enterprises. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 6, 175–182. (In Russ.).
3. 3. Masalimova, A. R. (2013). Corporate Training of Mentors. A Monograph. Kazan: Print-Service – XXI Century. (In Russ.).
4. 4. Forbes, M. H., & Chell, A. R. (2021). Exploring a New Mentorship Model: From One-on-One to Flash Mentoring. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Conference Proceedings, 26 July 2021. Article N: 176961
5. 5. Nugumanova, L. N., & Yakovenko, T. V. (2020). Handbook “Mentoring: an effective form of learning”. Information and methodological materials (2nd edition, additional and revised). Kazan: IRO RT. 51 p. (In Russ.).
6. 6. Parks, S. D. (2000). Big Questions, Worthy Dreams: Mentoring Young Adults in Their Search for Meaning, Purpose, and Faith. California: Jossey-Bass.
7. 7. Blinova, V. I. (2017). Methods of vocational training: a manual for mentors in the workplace. Moscow: Yurayt. 219 p. (In Russ.).
8. 8. Ribeiro, I. M., Duarte, T. P., Bastos, M. M., Sousa, A. A., & Martins, L. F. A. (2022). FEUP peer mentoring: Promoting integration through support and experience sharing. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 50(3), 615–628.
9. 9. Masalimova, A. R., Usak, М. & Shaidullina, A. R. (2016). Advantages and disadvantages of national and international corporate training techniques in adult education. Current Science, 111(9), 1480–1485.
10. 10. Madhavanprabhakaran, G., Francis, F., & Labrague, L. (2022). Reverse Mentoring and Intergenerational Learning in Nursing Bridging generational diversity. Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, 22(4), 472–478.
11. 11. Schmidt, M. (2008). Mentoring and being mentored: The story of a novice music teacher’s success. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 635–648.
12. 12. Migunova, E. V., Zhigalik, M. A., & Averkin, V. N. (2020). Reverse mentoring in the professional training of future teachers. Man and Education, 1(62), 88–93. (In Russ.).
13. 13. Esaulova, I. A. (2017). New models of mentoring in the practice of personnel training and development. Business strategies, 6 (In Russ.). https://clck.ru/FEDoN
14. 14. Yavuz, A. (2011). The problematic context of mentoring: Evidence from an english language teaching department at a Turkish University. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 43–59.
15. 15. United States Office of Personal Management. (2008). Best Practices: Mentoring. https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/training-and-development/career-development/bestpractices-mentoring.pdf
Download file .pdf 463.4 kb