Authors
- Valek Nataliya A. PhD in Philological Science
- Pozdina Elena A. PhD in Technical Sciences, Associate Professor
- Gimaliev Vagiz G. PhD of Pedagogical Sciences
Annotation
Industry research institutes (IRI) play the key role in training of narrowly focused experts and enhancement of the post-graduate education effectiveness. IRI provide ties between science and production, science and practice. This is here where professional training of young industrial and scientific staff, students, post-graduate students, and researchers goes on. Here industry (or: applied) science develops on and connects academic and university researchers, studies, developments and innovations for industrial applications. Nowadays they evaluate efficiency of IRI and their staff with the methods that are applied to scientific institutions: results of researches carried out in the frameworks of governmental or branch assignments, a number of researchers’ publications and their quality (including the number of citations), the impact factor of the journals issued by an institution, and a number of other indirect but, nevertheless, objective indicators are take into consideration. In the conditions of the changing state policy in the sphere of scientific information and assessment of the institutions’ scientific efficiency that is aimed to protection of the national interests, and lately appeared stable trend to decreasing of the researchers’ number IRI are particularly responsible, on the state scale, for reproduction of highly qualified production and scientific staff. As a study case the article uses special features of Russian Research Institute for Integrated Water Management and Protection (Rostov-on-the Don) functioning. Analysis (including that of bibliometric and scientometric indicators), synthesis, and deduction are the main methods of research. Bibliometric data bases and citation indices served the sources of data. The work has been carried out with taking into account relevant regulatory acts and methodical materials. As the Russian Index of Scientific Citation has shown, national IRI are sufficiently isolated structures focused on themselves and this fact hinders coordination of the interests of science and practice. Quite often IRI deal with solution of specific local problems (sometimes certain provincialism and preoccupation with petty matters are typical). The authors propose some practice-oriented recommendations aimed at enhancement of the IRI efficiency and lobbying the interests of their industries science.
How to link insert
Valek, N. A., Pozdina, E. A. & Gimaliev, V. G. (2023). FACTORS OF THE INDUSTRY RESEARCH INSTITUTE EFFECTIVENESS DEVELOPMENT IN THE CURRENT SITUATION Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 17(3), 25. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2023.17.3.02
References
1.
1. Artola Korta, M. (2020). Science and academic research in soviet karelia: the history of the Karelian research institute (1930–1937). Nordic and Baltic Studies review, 5, 134–153.
2.
2. Pokrovskiy, M. (1922). Contradictions of Mr. Milyukov. Moscow.
3.
3. Bolshakova, O. V. (Ed.) (2014). Science in the USSR: Contemporary foreign historiography. Collection of reviews and abstracts. RAS, INION, Center of sociological scientific/information studies, Section of history. Moscow.
4.
4. Oboldina, G. A. (2019). Ecological support of the water use regulation (the review of the national standards developed by RosNIIVKh). In: Prokhorova, N. B. (Ed.). Scientific/practical studies of Russian Research Institute for Integrated Water Management and Protection. Ekaterinburg. 24 p.
5.
5. Ogorodnov, A. M. (2016). Special features of the analysis of a research institute financial / economic activities. Vectors of the contemporary science development, 1(3), 147–149.
6.
6. Dzeniskevich, A. (2005). Medical Research Institutes during the Siege. In: Barber, J., & Dzeniskevich, A. (Eds). Life and Death in Besieged Leningrad, 1941–1944 (pp. 86–122). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
7. Tsivadze, A. Y. (2007). Russian Federation State Scientific Center All-Russian Research Institute of Aviation Materials (“VIAM”) is 75 years old. Protection of metals, 43(5), 554–556.
8.
8. Prokhorova, N. B., & Pozdina, E. A. (2009). On the eve of the fifth decade. Water Sector of Russia: Problems, Technologies, Management. № 4. P. 4–15.
9.
9. Maslyakov, V. Y. (2019). Scientific/organization experience of the medical plants research in All-Russia Research Institute of Medical and Aromatic Plants. Biologist field log, 1(3), 150–157.
10.
10. Matyshkin, S. N., Rochev, A. M., & Katanovich, A. A. (2019). Preparation of scientific staff in research institute of communication of the Navy. Marine collection, 6, 56–60.
11.
11. Ulanov, A. K. (2022). From the history of Buryat Research Institute of Agriculture. Siberian archive, 2(12), 142–151.
12.
12. Gimpelson, V. E., Kapelyushnikov, R. I., & Ratnikova, T. A. (2003). Fear of unemployment and flexibility of wages in Russia. Economic journal of Higher School of Economy, 7(3), 341–370.
13.
13. Zharkova, S. L., & Tsigakov, V. A. (2009). Classification and systematization of able-bodies population in terms of age groups. Omsk Scientific News Bulletin. Series: Society. History. Present, 4(79), 67–70.
14.
14. Prokhorova, N. B. (2019). On occasion of the Institute’s jubilee. Water Sector of Russia: Problems, Technologies, Management, 4, 3–8.
15.
15. Bukharova, N. V. (2014). Material (monetary) stimulation of the industry research institutes’ staff. PhD of the Economic Sciences Thesis.
16.
16. Melikhov, V. V. (2018). Novel directions of the scientific activity of the All-Russian Research Institute of Irrigated Agriculture. Irrigated agriculture, 3, 3–4.
17.
17. Rimskaya, O. N., & Naumenko, S. N. (2022). Stimulation of the industry research institute researchers’ work. Economics of science, 8(3–4), 238–254. https://doi.org/10.22394/2410-132X-2022-8-3-4-238–254
18.
18. Markina, G. L., Shley, M. D., Kuznetsova, O. V., Stafeyev, S. K., & Markina, T. A. (2020). Assessment of the scientific activity potential based on scientometric indicators. Computer tools in education, 3, 70–85. https://doi.org/10.32603/2071-2340-2020-3-70-85
19.
19. Khaladov, K.-A. S., Golovina, I. V., & Paputkova, G. A. (2022). Publication activity of pedagogical institutions of higher education” quantitative and qualitative indicators. Higher education in Russia, 31(2), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-2-58-67
20.
20. Valek, N. А. (2021a). On the Issue of Representation of Water/economic Journals in Scientific Citation Bases. Water Sector of Russia: problems, technologies, management, 1, 113–136. https://doi.org/10.35567/1999-4508-2021-1-7
21.
21. Valek, N. A. (2022). Development of Measures for the Development of a Branch Publication (Based on the Example of the “Water Sector of Russia: Problems, Technologies, Management” Journal). Science Governance and Scientometrics, 17(3), 358–379. https://doi.org/10.33873/2686-6706.2022.17-3.358-379
22.
22. Anikeyeva, O. S. (2009). The use of the scientific citation index as a characteristic of the scientists’ research activities. News bulletin of Stavropol State University, 5, 5–11.
23.
23. Valek, N. A. (2021b). Russian water science in the scientific citation bases. A monograph. Ekaterinburg.
24.
24. Balybin, V. A. (2020). Research experimental institute (electronic warfare): 60 years on guard of air. Military conceptions, 12, 78–85.
25.
25. David-Fox, M. (2011). The implications of transnationalism. Kritika. Bloomington, 12(4), 885–904.