Authors
- Adamsky Alexander I. PhD in Education
- Podbolotova Marina Ivanovna PhD in Pedagogy
- Ustyugova Olga B.
- Kolachev Nikita I. PhD in Psychology
Annotation
The analysis of approaches to determining the essence of pedagogical activity, the study of practices and reconstruction of activities of teachers in Moscow and other regions of Russia who use high-tech learning tools in their activities allow us to consider the necessity of constructing a teacher’s activity from positions determined, first of all, by the changes in the sociocultural situation of the development of the modern society and the transformation of education characterized by the rapid development of technology and pedagogical innovations. In this connection, this article is aimed to, based on the assessment of the dynamics and nature of the relevant processes presented in the scientific articles and research data, reconstruct the activity, describe the individual operations (modes of action) of a teacher and build a multidimensional model of the activity of teachers who use high-tech learning tools in their practice. The article presents and describes a model of a teacher’s activity as a framework that reflects the interrelation and interdependence of the instrumental, subject-based, and social aspects of their activity in the logic of the unity of educational process and the internal connection of action mediated by the use of high-tech learning tools in the following projection: operation (method) – meaning of action – interaction. The reconstruction of activities and descriptions of operations (methods of action) of teachers who use high-tech learning tools, according to the activity model we proposed, made it possible to determine a generalized algorithm of activity of teachers who use high-tech learning tools in their activities.
How to link insert
Adamsky, A. I., Podbolotova, M. I., Ustyugova, O. B. & Kolachev, N. I. (2024). DEVELOPMENT OF A MODEL OF ACTIVITY OF TEACHERS USING HIGH-TECH LEARNING TOOLS BASED ON RECONSTRUCTION OF ACTIVITIES AND DESCRIPTIONS OF OPERATIONS (ACTIONS) Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 18 (1-1), 140. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2024.18.1-1.07
References
1.
1. Yushkov, A. N., & Agramakova, O. V. (2020). Projects and research to develop scientific and engineering skills. Obrazovatelnaya politika, (S5), 25–33. (In Russ.).
2.
2. Sergomanov, P. А., & Bysik, N. V. (2022). Teacher practices: research and its platformization in the digital era. Obrazovatelnaya politika, 1(89), 54–65. (In Russ.).
3.
3. Susanne, W., & Niklas, G. (2022). Transferring makerspace activities to the classroom: a tension between two learning cultures. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33, 1755–1772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09799-2
4.
4. Dhir, H. (2021). Handbook of Research on Barriers for Teaching 21st-Century Competencies and the Impact of Digitalization. IGI Global. 468 p. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6967-2
5.
5. Ng, W. (2020). New digital technology in education: Conceptualizing professional learning for educators. 226 p. Journal of Foreign Language Education and Technology, 5(1). http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5309-7470
6.
6. Singh, M., Bangay, S., Grossek, H., & Sajjanhar, A. (2023). Forest Classroom: A Case Study of Educational Augmented Reality Design to Facilitate Classroom Engagement. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 7(5), art. 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7050046
7.
7. Kamenskaya, V. G., & Tomanov, L. V. (2022). Digital technologies and their impact on the social and psychological characteristics of children and adolescents. Experimental psychology, 15(1), 139–159. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Avdeeva, S. М., Uvarov, А. Yu., & Tarasova, К. V. (2022). Digital transformation of schools and information and communication competence of students. Voprosy obrazovaniya (Educational Studies Moscow), (1), 218–240. (In Russ.).
9.
9. Barzilai, S., Mor-Hagani, S., Abed, F., Tal-Savir, D., Goldik, N., Talmon, I., & Davidow, O. (2023, September). Misinformation Is Contagious: Middle school students learn how to evaluate and share information responsibly through a digital game. Computers and Education, 202, art. 104832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104832
10.
10. Holyfield Chr., & Lorah, E. (2022). Effects of High-tech Versus Low-tech AAC on Indices of Happiness for School-aged Children with Multiple Disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities. Published by Springer Nature, 35(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-022-09858-5
11.
11. Spasskiy, B. А. (2020). Excursions and thematic lectures at high-tech enterprises as important components of professional self-determination and additional education of students. Innovation, 11(265), 89–94. (In Russ.).
12.
12. Blinnikov, D. М. (2022). The role of educational centers “Growth Point” in the study of the subject “Physics”. Voprosy pedagogiki, 4(1), 46–49. (In Russ.).
13.
13. Leiman, О. N., & Kasatkina, I. G. (2022). Using a digital laboratory to improve student competencies in chemistry. Global scientific potential, 12(141), 125–128. (In Russ.).
14.
14. Kharunzheva, E. V., Shalaginova, N. V., Kuzmina, M. B., & Kobeleva, G. A. (2020). Practice of teamwork in a digital school to develop a “smart” mobile application. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2(44), 389–404. (In Russ.).
15.
15. Liston, M., Morrin, A. M., Furlong, T., & Griffin, L. (2022). Integrating Data Science and the Internet of Things Into Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics Education Through the Use of New and Emerging Technologies. Frontiers in Education, 7(3), art. 757866. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.757866
16.
16. Pivarníková, V., & Trojan, J. (2023). Adaptation of QGIS tools in high school geography education. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-4/W7-2023, 161–168, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W7-2023-161-2023
17.
17. Serpe, A. (2023). Digital Tools to Enhance Interdisciplinary Mathematics Teaching. In: Fulantelli, G., Burgos, D., Casalino, G., Cimitile, M., Lo Bosco, G., & Taibi, D. (Eds.). Higher Education Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online. HELMeTO 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 1779. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29800-4_16
18.
18. Kokorin, А. N., Alexandrova, О. V., & Gudovskiy, I. V. (2022). On the problem of developing research competencies in schoolchildren. Problems of modern teacher education, 76-4, 161–164. (In Russ.).
19.
19. Pobokin, P. А., & Selivanov, V. V. (2022). The role of virtual reality in the formation of mathematical knowledge and reflection among schoolchildren. Experimental psychology, 15(2), 37–48. (In Russ.).
20.
20. Pudovkina, О. Е., Shcherbakov, E. S. & Simonov, А. V. (2023). Development of intellectual qualities of students based on the formation of a digital ecosystem of STEM education in the conditions of industry 4.0. Koncept, (3), 91–108. (In Russ.).
21.
21. Southgate, E. (2020). Virtual reality in curriculum and pedagogy: Evidence from secondary classrooms. 148 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429291982
22.
22. Ojeda-Misses, M. A. (2023). Development of an Interactive Mobile Robot for Playful Learning and Language Teaching. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 18(1), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2023.3250582
23.
23. Karelkhan, N., Ibrayeva, P., & Karilkhan, N. (2023). Orta mektepte STREAM tehnologiiasymen oqytuda Scratch ortasyndagy mBlock bagdarlamasyn qoldanudyn erekshelіkterі [Features of Using the mBlock Program in the Scratch Environment in Teaching with STREAM Technology in High School]. Iasaui universitetіnіn habarshysy, 2(128), 314–328. https://doi.org/10.47526/2023-2/2664-0686.25
24.
24. Ocaña, J. M., Morales-Urrutia, E. K., Pérez-Marín, D., & Pizarro, C. (2023). About Gamifying an Emotional Learning Companion to Teach Programming to Primary Education Students. Simulation and Gaming, 54(7), art. 104687812311750. https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781231175013
25.
25. Vázquez-Cano, E., Quicios-García, M.-P., Fombona, J., & Rodríguez-Arce, J. (2023). Latent factors on the design and adoption of gamified apps in primary education. Education and Information Technologies, (25), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/с10639-023-11797-3
26.
26. Larina, G. S., & Kapuza, А. V. (2020). Cognitive Processes in Teaching: Relationship to Student Achievement in Mathematics. Voprosy obrazovaniya (Educational Studies Moscow), (1), 70–96. (In Russ.).
27.
27. Baranov, А. V., & Petrov, N. Yu. (2022). BYOD technologies (“Bring Your Own Device”) in an elective physics course for engineering classes. Pedagogyka. Voprosy theorii i practiki, 7(6), 588–595. (In Russ.).
28.
28. Lebedeva, М. Yu. (2022). Strategies for working with digital text to solve educational reading problems: a study using the method of verbal protocols. Voprosy obrazovaniya (Educational Studies Moscow), (1), 244–270. (In Russ.).
29.
29. Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2012). Development of a measurement instrument for innovative work behaviour as a dynamic and context-bound construct. Human Resource Development International, 15(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2011.646894
30.
30. Engström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activitytheo retical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Finland Orienta-Konsultit.
31.
31. Korepanova, I. А., & Vinogradova, Е. М. (2006). The concept of I. Engeström is a variant of reading the theory of activity of A. N. Leontyev. Cultural-historical psychology, 2(4), 76. (In Russ.).