Authors
- Petryaeva Elena Yu. PhD in Pedagogy
- Sumenkova Julia I.
- Fedorovskaya Maria N.
- Kozinchenko Irina V.
Annotation
The purpose of the study was to analyze the dynamics of the development of family education in the Russian Federation based on the official statistical data. The relevance of the study is determined by the increasing number of children who receive family education and the growing importance of this form of education in the Russian education system. The analysis of the dynamics of family education in Russia can serve as a basis for making legislative and administrative decisions in the field of regulation of family education. A comparative analysis of international and Russian academic literature on this topic shows similarities in the issues considered: organization of the educational process for children in family education (reasons for parents choosing family education, the influence of online learning on children and their parents, advantages and disadvantages of this form of education, the subjective position of the family in the child’s educational process, various models of family education). It was found that until 2023, the proportion of students enrolled in the form of family education / self-education in Russia did not exceed 1 % of the total number of students. In the 2020/2021 academic year, there was an increase in the number of students enrolled in the form of family education / self-education compared to the 2016/2017 academic year by more than 2 times: from 0.04 to 0.11 %. In the next 2021/2022 academic year, this indicator increased by another 3 times and was 0.33 %. The same value of the indicator was maintained in the 2022/2023 academic year, and in the 2023/2024 academic year, the proportion of students in the form of family education / self-education was 0.41 %. The regions of the Russian Federation with a high value of the family education indicator for the 2023/2024 academic year include Moscow, St. Petersburg, Omsk Region, Republic of Crimea, Republic of Adygea, Samara Region, Sevastopol, Krasnodar Territory, Nizhny Novgorod Region.
How to link insert
Petryaeva, E. Y., Sumenkova, J. I., Fedorovskaya, M. N. & Kozinchenko, I. V. (2024). FAMILY EDUCATION IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: THE ANALYSIS OF OFFICIAL STATISTICAL DATA Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 18 (2), 67. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2024.18.2.04
References
1.
1. Cheng, А., & Donnelly, M. (2019). New Frontiers in Research and Practice on Homeschooling. Peabody Journal of Education, 3(94), 259–262.
2.
2. Polivanova, K. N., & Lyubitskaya, K. A. (2017). Semeinoe obrazovanie v Rossii i za rubezhom. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya, 6(2), 72–80. (In Russ.).
3.
3. Lyalikova, S. V., & Antonov, A. I. (2022). Sotsiologicheskoe issledovanie fenomena semeinogo obrazovaniya. Sotsial’no-gumanitarnye znaniya, 5, 66–70. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Vachkova, S. N., Petryaeva, E. Yu., Klimov, I. A. et al. (2022). Issledovanie polucheniya shkol’nogo obrazovaniya v forme semeinogo obrazovaniya v bol’shom gorode. Moskva: Grin Print. 68 p. (In Russ.).
5.
5. Nugumanova, L. N., Yakovenko, T. V., & Davletshina, L. A. (2022). Roditeli-khoumskulery i shkol’naya sistema obrazovaniya: tochki vzaimodeistviya. Nauka i shkola, 6, 120–133. (In Russ.).
6.
6. Forlin, C., Chambers, D., Banks, J. (2023). Developing a scale to measure the diversity of motivations and practices of home-schooling. Educational Review.
7.
7. Gryaznova, E. V., Goncharuk, A. G., Lobanova, A. A., & Zhigul’skii, E. V. (2020). Semeinoe obrazovanie v Rossii: problemy i perspektivy. Azimut nauchnykh issledovanii: pedagogika i psikhologiya, 9, 2(31), 159–161. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Sidorov, A. N., & Maltseva, S. M. (2020). Aktual’nye plyusy i minusy semeinogo obrazovaniya. Obrazovanie i problemy razvitiya obshchestva, 2(11), 133–138. (In Russ.).
9.
9. Silakova, O. V., & Eremeeva, O. V. (2022). Semeinoe obrazovanie kak al’ternativa shkol’nomu obrazovaniyu: dostoinstva i nedostatki. Obshchestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika, 11(103), 160–165. (In Russ.).
10.
10. Guterman, O. (2022). Future Orientation among Homeschooled Adolescents in Israel. J Child Fam Stud, 31, 1350–1359.
11.
11. Norman, D., Luo, T., & Muljana, P. (2020). Parents’ voices: Virtual classroom bridging homeschooling to public schools. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 13(2), 1–20.
12.
12. Miller, O. M., Romanova, Yu. A., & Dubovik, E. Yu. (2023). Semeinoe obrazovanie kak vozmozhnost’ proyavleniya sub”ektnoi pozitsii sem’i v sisteme obshchego obrazovaniya. Psikhologiya i pedagogika detstva: o tsennostyakh sovremennogo obrazovaniya. Sbornik statei materialov konferentsii, Krasnoyarsk, 23–24 marta 2023 g. (v 2 ch.; pp. 109–113). Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarskii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii universitet im. V. P. Astaf’eva. (In Russ.).
13.
13. Mitrofanova, O. V., Piskunova, S. V., & Naumov P. Yu. (2022). Kontseptsiya semeinogo obrazovaniya: na puti k resheniyu problemy individualizatsii obucheniya. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskii poisk, 4(64), 61–73. (In Russ.).
14.
14. Ray, В. (2021, June). Should educators promote homeschooling? Worldwide growth and learner outcomes. Journal of Pedagogy, 12, 1, Special Issue: Home-Based Education, 55–76.
15.
15. Antuf’eva, M. P. (2022). Model’ organizatsionno-pedagogicheskogo soprovozhdeniya semeinogo obrazovaniya v Rossii. Sovremennoye pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye, 5, 10–12. (In Russ.).
16.
16. Mingazov, I. F., Yarkova, T. A., & Milovanova, N. G. (2019). Modeli i opyt organizatsii semeinogo obrazovaniya. Vestnik Nizhnevartovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 4, 102–109. (In Russ.).
17.
17. Kirichenko, E. B. (2022). Semeinoe obrazovanie v Yaroslavskoi oblasti: opyt issledovaniya sostoyaniya problemy. Antropologicheskaya didaktika i vospitanie, 5(5), 51–68. (In Russ.).
18.
18. Spiridonova, M. A. (2023) Retrospektivnyi analiz organizatsionno-pedagogicheskikh uslovii soprovozhdeniya praktik semeinogo obrazovaniya v Rossii. Ustoichivoe razvitie nauki i obrazovaniya, 1(76), 56–63. (In Russ.).