Authors
- Kosykh Oksana I. PhD in Historical Sciences
- Ponomarenko Elena B. PhD (Philology), Associate Professor
- Donskova Lyudmila A. PhD (Philology), Associate Professor
Annotation
The relevance of the study is determined by the growth of objective risks and threats to the comprehensive security of the Russian Federation: economic, political and information threats, instability of social well-being of society. These risks lead to limited accessibility of the population to social infrastructure (services in the sphere of education, health care, culture, social protection). The sphere of education, being the most significant for the development and preservation of human capital and potential of the country, determining the competitiveness of the state, seems to be the most important in the implementation of measures to reduce and prevent modern and potential risks and threats. In addition, the 21st century is characterized by the intensification of globalization processes and global challenges. Despite the development of the system of international cooperation to date, the issues of comprehensive security in general, national, and public security, come to the forefront for the Russian Federation. The hypothesis of the study is that one of the important mechanisms for ensuring comprehensive security of the country can be the targeted
development of the education system, which has rarely been fully studied in the relevant context. The aim of the research: to study the risks and threats of the Russian education system in the context of ensuring national security of the country. The article presents the results of the theoretical study, the source of information in which became the scientific works of domestic and foreign authors on the designated problem. VOSviewer program was used as a means of bibliometric analysis. The sample of the study consisted of academic scientific works of Russian and foreign authors. As a result of the study of the current state of the education system in the context of key factors of its impact on the national security of the Russian Federation, the priority tasks for the state were formulated, the main and potential risks and threats were identified.
How to link insert
Kosykh, O. I., Ponomarenko, E. B. & Donskova, L. A. (2024). EDUCATION AS A SYSTEM-BREAKING FACTOR IN PROVIDING SECURITY OF THE COUNTRY Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 18 (2), 189. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2024.18.2.12
References
1.
1. Kalashnikov, A. O., & Mikhalevich, I. F. (2018). About the unified system of classification of protection of automated control systems and infocommunication systems by the criteria of importance and of information security. In: Systems of Signals Generating and Processing in the Field of on-Board Communications, Moscow, Russia (pp. 1–6). https://doi.org/10.1109/SOSG.2018.8350598
2.
2. Chan, H. (2019). Significance of Information Security Awareness in the Higher Education Sector. International Journal of Computer Applications, 60(10), 23–31.
3.
3. Dun, N., & Paullet, K. (2019). The urgency for cybersecurity education: The impact of early college innovation in Hawaii rural communities. II Information System Education Journal, 16(4), 41–52.
4.
4. Gross, M. L., Canetti, D., & Vashdi, D. R. (2017). Cyberterrorism: its effects on psychological well-being, public confidence and political attitudes. Journal of Cybersecurity, 3(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyw018
5.
5. Bal, A., Waitoller, F. R., Mawene, D., & Gorham, A. (2021). Culture, context, and disability: Asystematic literature review of cultural-historical activity theory-based studies on the teachingand learning of students with disabilities. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 43(4), 293–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714413.2020.1829312
6.
6. Sinyagina, N. Yu., & Artamonova, E. G. (2020). National security and education system in modern conditions. Personality Formation, 1(2), 10–11. EDN DCYBLW. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Afontsev, S. A. (2020). Conceptual framework for the analysis of national and international economic security. The Economy under Guard, 2, 27–47. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36511/2588-0071-2020-2-27-47 Retrived from
8.
8. Gorelin, V. Y., & Bezus, M. Y. (2020). On the security of the critical information infrastructure of the Russian Federation. StudNet, 9, 1438–1448.
9.
9. Rubio, J. E., Roman, R., & Lopezm, J. (2018). Analysis of Cybersecurity Threats in Industry 4.0: The Case of Intrusion Detection. In: Critical Information Infrastructures Security (pp.119–130).
10.
10. Aubel, P. V., Papagiannopoulos, K., Chmielewski, L., & Doerr, Ch. (2018). Side-Channel Based Intrusion Detection for Industrial Control System. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 207–224).
11.
11. Moallem, A. (2019). Cybersecurity Awareness Among Students and Faculty. In: Cybersecurity Awareness Among Students and Faculty. 104 p. https://doi.
org/10.1201/9780429031908
12.
12. Zhuravlev, A. L., & Nestik, T. A. (2019). Socio-psychological consequences of the introduction of new technologies: promising directions of research. Psihologicheskij zhurnal, 40(5), 35–47. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920006074-7
13.
13. Kislyakov, P. A., Meerson, A. L. S., & Shmeleva, E. A. (2022, November 15–18). Risk society, VUCA-world and BANI-world: threats to psychological safety or opportunities for development. In: Kozhevnikova, O. V., & Khotinets, V. Y. (Scientific Ed.). Transmission of Cultural Experience and Social Practices in the Age of Transitivity. Collection of Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 181–182). Izhevsk: UdSU. (In Russ.).
14.
14. Nestik, T. A. (2020). Attitude to new technologies and value orientations of Russians. Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Organizational psychology and psychology of work, 5(4), 54–82. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.opwp.2020.17.4.003
15.
15. Nestik, T. A., & Zhuravlev, A. L. (2018). Psychology of global risks. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.).
16.
16. Petryaeva, E. Y., Salakhova, V. B., & Soumenkova, Y. I. (2024). The problem of studying the competitiveness of higher education teacher and general education teacher in the context of modern challenges and threats of the digital world. Alma Mater (Vestnik Vysshey Shkoly), 1, 96–106. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.01-24.096
17.
17. Burlyaeva, V. A., Oleshkevich, T. A., Solovyova, N. V., & Chebanov, K. A. (2023, April 15). Analysis of the foundations of traditional spiritual and moral education in the educational space of modern society. In: Trends in the development of science and global challenges. Themed collection of papers from Foreign International Scientific Conference, Managua, Nicaragua (pp. 56–60). Managua, Nicaragua: Humanitarian National Research Institute “NACRAZVITIE”. https://doi.org/10.37539/230415.2023.80.42.012
18.
18. Lobanov, N. A., & Skvortsov, V. N. (Scientific Ed.) (2011). Lifelong Learning: Continuous Education for Sustainable Development. Proceedings of 13th International Conference. Pushkin LSU, Res. Inst. soc.-econ. and ped. problems of contin. edu. Vol. 9. Saint-Petersburg: LSU n. a. A. S. Pushkin.
19.
19. Gabdrafikov, I., & Glukhovtsev, V. (2021). Features of the formation of civic identity in the polyethnic region of Russia (on the example of the Republic of Bashkortostan). Bulletin of the BIST (Bashkir Institute of Social Technologies), 4(53), 101–107. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.47598/2078-9025-2021-4-53-101-107
20.
20. Badalova, A. G., Goncharova, E. B., Volnaya, S. A., & Kaznacheeva, A. A. (2024). “Industrial Potential Management: Dynamics, Structure, Approaches, Indicators”. In: 6th International Youth Conference on Radio Electronics, Electrical and Power Engineering (REEPE), Moscow, Russian Federation (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.1109/REEPE60449.2024.10479564