Authors
- Spiridonova Yulia S.
Annotation
Modern society is characterized by high rates of digitalization, which leads to certain adjustments in the field of education. New requirements are being imposed on teacher training, one of which is the ability to model and introduce digital learning resources within the educational process. One of the elements of teacher training is digital culture. The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between the categories of “digital culture” and “critical thinking”, which are included in the professional training of future teachers at a classical university. The study of the problem is based on theoretical research methods, such as conducting scientific literature
review dedicated to the development of digital culture and critical thinking of students, which revealed a relationship between these categories. The author provides arguments for the relevance of the development of digital culture of future teachers, as well as development of their critical thinking as a necessary condition for the shaping of components of digital culture. The article provides examples of teaching methods with digital tools that are effective for the development of critical thinking and digital culture. One of the ways to solve the problem of developing digital culture and critical thinking skills is to create an elective course aimed at introducing to future teachers the possibilities of information technologies for teaching, developing their skills in using digital tools in their future professional activities, as well as training in modeling and implementing digital learning resources in the educational process to increase its effectiveness.
How to link insert
Spiridonova, Y. S. (2024). THE RELATIONSHIP OF DIGITAL CULTURE AND CRITICAL THINKING OF THE FUTURE TEACHER IN THE CONDITIONS OF DIGITALIZATION Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 18 (2), 118. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2024.18.2.07
References
1.
1. Aldoshina, M. I. (2023). Problems and prospects of the impact of information technology on teacher education at the university. In: Educational space in the Information Age. Collection of scientific papers of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, Moscow, 2023, June 06–07. Moscow: Institute of Education Development Strategy (In Russ.).
2.
2. Rozin, V. M. (2023). Digitalization in education (following the research “Difficulties and prospects of digital transformation of education”). Culture of culture, 1. (In Russ.).
3.
3. Gnatyshina, E. V. (2018). Pedagogical tools for the formation of the digital culture of the future teacher. Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University, 3, 46–54. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Nosova, L. S. (2019). The model of digital culture of future teachers in the context of digitalization of education. Bulletin of the South Ural State Humanitarian Pedagogical University, 4, 134–154. (In Russ.).
5.
5. Mezinov, V. N. (2020). Actualization of the problem of formation of the digital culture of students of the pedagogical direction. Nizhny Novgorod education, 4, 65–71. (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/aktualizatsiya-problemy-formirovaniya-tsifrovoy-kultury-studentov-pedagogicheskogo-napravleniya
6.
6. Shaukhalova, R. A. (2020). Organizational and pedagogical conditions for the formation of digital culture of university students. Modern higher school: an innovative aspect, 2, 63–69. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Yarychev, N. U., & Gnatyshina, E. V. (2019). Theoretical aspects of the application of an activity-reflective approach to the formation of a teacher’s digital culture. Modern higher education: an innovative aspect, 4(46), 31–37. (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/teoreticheskie-aspekty-primeneniya-deyatelnostno-refleksivnogo-podhoda-k-formirovaniyu-tsifrovoy-kultury-uchitelya
8.
8. Spiridonova, Y. S. (2023). The concept and structure of the digital culture of the future teacher. Education and Society, 5(142), 83–89.
9.
9. Yuan, R., & Liao, W. (2023). Critical thinking in teacher education: where do we stand and where can we go? Teachers and Teaching, 29(6), 543–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2252688
10.
10. Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking. Concepts and Tools. Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.
11.
11. Mushtavinskaya, I. (2022). Technology for the development of critical thinking in the classroom and in the teacher training system. St. Petersburg: KARO. 153 p. (In Russ.).
12.
12. Khachumyan, T. I. (2023). The concept of “critical thinking” and its essence in psychological and pedagogical science. In: Theoretical issues of culture, education and upbringing. Collection of Sciences (issue 24, part 2, pp. 171–177). Kiev: KNLU. (In Russ.).
13.
13. Semenova, O. M. (2015). Methods of studying the critical thinking of a future teacher. Izv. Samar. Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1(17), 60–63. (In Russ.).
14.
14. Wang, D., & Jia, Q. (2023). Twenty years of research development on teachers’ critical thinking: Current status and future implications — A bibliometric analysis of research articles collected in WOS. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 48, 101252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101252
15.
15. Han, W., & Nur, A. (2023). The role of teachers’ creativity in higher education: A systematic literature review and guidance for future research. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 48, 101302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101302
16.
16. Solomenko, A. A. (2016). Elements of technology for the development of critical thinking of future physics teachers. In: Krutsky, A. N., and Gibelgauz, O. S. (Scientific Ed.). Psychodidactics of higher and secondary education. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Scientific and Practical Conference, Barnaul, April 12–14, 2016 (pp. 137–139). Barnaul: Altai State Pedagogical University. (In Russ.).
17.
17. Halpern, D. (2000). The psychology of critical thinking. St. Petersburg: Peter. 512 p. (In Russ.).
18.
18. Torybayeva, Zh., Berkimbayev K., & Baymanova, U. (2021). The system of training a future English teacher to form the critical thinking of schoolchildren. Science, new technologies and innovations of Kyrgyzstan, 7, 254–260. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26104/NNTIK.2019.45.557
19.
19. Zeer, E. F. (2005). A competence-based approach to education. Education and science, 3(33), 27–40. (In Russ.).
20.
20. Davies, M. (2013). Critical thinking and the disciplines reconsidered. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(4), 529–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.697878
21.
21. Kirk, M., Tytler, R., & White, P. (2023). Critical thinking in primary science through a guided inquiry pedagogy: A semiotic perspective. Teachers and Teaching, 29(6), 615–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2191181
22.
22. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. D. C. Heath and Company, Lexington. https://archive.org/details/howwethink000838mbp/page/n1/mode/2up
23.
23. Diler, O., & Aggul, G. (2021). Critical Thinking for Teachers. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351487185_Critical_Thinking_for_Teachers
24.
24. Kromme, Ch. (2017). Humanification: Go Digital, Stay Human. UK, Gloucestershire: The Choir Press. 242 p.
25.
25. Meirbekov, A., Maslova, I., & Gallyamova, Z. (2022). Digital education tools for critical thinking development. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, 101023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101023