Authors
- Lukyanenko Alena E.
Annotation
Group activity is always associated with communication between participants. The article aims to reveal factors that help communicate in collaborative activities, according to students’ perceptions. Processing of data obtained from student groups, was prepared using content analysis and word form matching. The applied methods involve frequency analysis, rank accrual, z-test. A statistically significant difference has been established between the semantic categories of males and females, which consists in the disparity of semantic groups’ hierarchy. The revealed semantic groups identify factors that facilitate group communication in collaborative activities. It provides opportunities for the targeted influence, that allows speeding up the group organization and maintain its performance.
References
1.
1. Hargie, O. (2021). Skilled Interpersonal Communication: Research, Theory and Practice (7th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003182269
2.
2. Bandura, A. (2000). Cultivate self-efficacy for personal and organizational effectiveness. In: Locke, E. A. (Ed.). The Blackwell Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior (pp. 120–136). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119206422.ch10
3.
3. Dzhioeva, О. F. (2017). The main determinants of the difficulty of communication. Baltic Humanitarian Journal, 3(20), 144–147. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Lomov, B. F. (1981). The problem of communication in psychology. Moscow: Nauka. 280 p. (In Russ.).
5.
5. Farooqi, R., Ashraf, F., & Nazeer, I. (2020). Interpersonal Communication, Teamwork Effectiveness, and Organizational Commitment in Pakistani Nurses. Pakistan
Journal of Psychological Research, 35, 675–692. https://doi.org/10.33824/PJPR.2020.35.4.36
6.
6. Sklyarenko, I. S., Hodyakova, N. V. (2019). Group educational activity as a personally developing educational environment. Vestnik of Moscow University of the Ministry
of Internal Affairs of Russia, 1, 249–255. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Bodalev, A. A. (2015). Perception of Man by Man (2nd ed.). Moscow: Encyclopedist-Maximum. 240 p. (In Russ.). https://cogito-shop.com/catalog/sotsialnaya-psikhologiya/
vospriyatie-i-ponimanie-cheloveka-chelovekom/
8.
8. Korepanova, E. V., & Kirpicheva, E. V. (2020). Dialogical communication in psychological support of students’ learning. Issues of modern science and practice. V. I. Vernadsky
University, 4, 91–99. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44355972
9.
9. Martono, S., Khoiruddin, M., Wijayanto, A., Ridloah, S., Wulansari, N., & Udin, U. (2020). Increasing Teamwork, Organizational Commitment and Effectiveness through
the Implementation of Collaborative Resolution. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7, 427–437. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.427
10.
10. Moscovici, S. (1976). La Psychanalyse: Son image et son public (2ème ed.). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
11.
11. Bovina, I. B. (2010). Theory of social representations: history and modern development. Sociological Journal, 3, 5–20. (In Russ.).
12.
12. Petrenko, V. F., Mitina, O. V., & Suprun, A. P. (2021). Conscious and unconscious cognition in psychosemantics. Psychology. Journal of the HSE, 4, 930–943. https://doi.
org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-4-930-943
13.
13. Kostina, E. Y., & Orlova, N. A. Social activity and social responsibility in the ideas and practices of modern youth. Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology, 13(1), 129–143. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48262073
14.
14. Velikaya, N. M., & Shushpanova, I. S. Russian youth about prospects and images of the future socio-political development of the country. Bulletin of the South-Russian State
Technical University (NPI). Series: Socio-Economic Sciences, 14(2), 29–40. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=45555163
15.
15. Zhemchugova, N. A. (2019). The specifics of the psychological structure of sociability of boys and girls. Pedagogical Education in Russia, 3, 80–85. (In Russ.).
16.
16. Luszczynska, A., & Schwarzer, R. (2020). Changing Behavior Using Social Cognitive Theory. In: Hagger, M. S., Cameron, L. D., Hamilton, K., Hankonen, N., & Lintunen, T. (Eds.).
The Handbook of Behavior Change (pp. 32–45). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677318.003
17.
17. Ivanova, E. M., Mitina, O. V., Zaytseva, A. S., Stefanenko, E. A., & Enikolopov, S. N. (2013). Russian-language adaptation of the humor styles questionnaire developed by R. Martin. Theoretical and Experimental Psychology, 6(2), 71–85. (In Russ.).
18.
18. Ryskulova, M. N. (2019). Group, team, command. Correlation of concepts. Modern Pedagogical Education, 10, 191–194. (In Russ.).
19.
19. Chow, I. (2018). Cognitive diversity and creativity in teams: The mediating roles of team learning and inclusion. Chinese Management Studies, 12(4), 369–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-09-2017-0262
20.
20. Yakubov, P. V. (2016). Communication: definition of the concept, types of communication and its barriers. Vestnik GSU, 10, 261–266. (In Russ.).
21.
21. Babakhouya, Y. (2019). The Big Five personality factors as predictors of English language speaking anxiety: A cross-country comparison between Morocco and South Korea. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(4), 502–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919894792
22.
22. Khapaeva, M. M. (2007). Social and psychological aspects of communicative competence. Science. Innovation. Technologies, 52, 76–80. (In Russ.).
23.
23. Mironova, M. N. (2010). Concepts of free will in psychology oriented toward Christian anthropology. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 18(3), 83–109. (In Russ.).