Authors
- Kolysheva Elena Yu. PhD in Philology, Associate Professor
- Sokolova Maria A.
Annotation
In this article, the authors consider M. A. Bulgakov’s novel “The Master and Margarita” as a linguistic and cultural text by analyzing the precedent lexical units functioning in it. They are an artistic reflection of the Soviet way of life of the 1930s where the “Moscow” chapters are based on. The relevance of the study of this problem is due to the need to work with linguistic and cultural codes, formation and expansion of the precedent field of the linguistic personality of students. In this regard, the article focuses on the need to work with the methodological aspect of considering the issue of studying precedent texts in the process of modern school philological education. In this regard, the purpose of the article is the need to work with the methodological aspect of considering
the issue of studying precedent texts in the process of modern school philological education. The article focuses on the close connection between historical reality and its creative reinterpretation
through the consideration of precedent texts on the pages of M. A. Bulgakov’s novel and the meta-objective nature of the proposed work. The basis of the methodological research is the system of tasks presented by the authors, it affords for a deep and comprehensive analysis of precedent texts from the novel by M. A. Bulgakov “The Master and Margarita” in terms of a historical and cultural point of view in the literature lesson. Tasks are accompanied by the fragments from Soviet and Russian historical sources, so they are aimed at a comprehensive analysis of Soviet reality and its artistic reinterpretation by the writer. In addition, the article provides the examples of proposed historical references as a methodological support for teachers. The proposed task system demonstrates the effectiveness of work with precedent texts as a lexical unit that artistically interprets historical reality and deeps into the details of the analysis of the novel. The article also offers creative and research perspectives for further work with the educational product of such an activity, expanding the intellectual and cognitive student’s opportunities. The materials presented in the article we recommend for realization not only in the literature lesson, but also in a binary lesson in 11th grade together with teachers of social and economic disciplines.
References
1.
1. Karaulov, Yu. N. (2010). Russian language and language personality. Moscow: LKI Publishing House. 264 p. (In Russ.)
2.
2. Mishatina, N. L. (2022). Methodological linguoconceptology: new ideas and anthropopractics. Monograph. Preface by S. G. Vorkachev. St. Petersburg: Book House LLC. 304 p. (In Russ.)
3.
3. Mishatina, N. L. (2008). Linguoculturological instructional text and concept-centric supertext as linguometric concepts. Actual problems of philology and pedagogical linguistics,
10. (In Russ.) URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/lingvokulturologicheskiy-uchebnyy-tekst-i-kontseptotsentricheskiy-sverhtekst-kak-lingvometoricheskie-ponyatiya
4.
4. Kolysheva, E. Yu. (2021). Analysis of the «Moscow» chapters of the novel by M. A. Bulgakov «The Master and Margarita» in a literature lesson in grade 11. In: Kokhanova, V. A. (Rev. ed.). Problems of modern philological education. Collection of scientific articles (issue XIX, pp. 132–144). Moscow: Moscow City University; Yaroslavl: Remder. (In Russ.)
5.
5. Chudakova, M. O. (2016). Bulgakov’s world. Audio lectures. Published on 27.10.2016. Arzamas | Cultural History in lectures, podcasts and texts. (In Russ.) URL: https://arzamas.academy/
courses/39
6.
6. Kolysheva, E. Yu. (2020). The formation of subtext in the image of the era in the history of the text of M. A. Bulgakov’s novel «The Master and Margarita». In: M. Bulgakov’s
novel «The Master and Margarita»: a dialogue with modernity. A collective monograph (pp. 249–270). Sent Petersburg: Russian Christian Humanitarian Academy. (In Russ.)
7.
7. Yablokov, E. А. (2001). Artistic world of Mikhail Bulgakov. Moscow: Languages of Slavic culture. 419 p.
8.
8. Chudakova, M. O. (2007). New works: 2003–2006. Moscow: Time. 560 p. (In Russ.)
9.
9. Bulgakov, M. A. (2014). The Master and Margarita. Complete drafts of the novel. Main text. In 2 vols. Sost., tekstol. podgot., publikator, avt. predisl., komment. E. Yu. Kolysheva.
Moscow: Pashkov dom. Vol. 2. 816 p. (In Russ.)
10.
10. Dunev, A. I. (2022). Cicadas of quotations. Student’s quotation minimum. Reference dictionary. Moscow: Ridero. 224 p. (In Russ.)
11.
11. Lebina, N. (2015). Soviet everyday life: norms and anomalies. From war communism to big style. Moscow: New Literary Review. 488 p. (In Russ.)
12.
12. Leskis, G. A., & Atarova, K. N. (2023). Moscow – Ershalaim: A guide to the novel by M. Bulgakov «The Master and Margarita». Moscow: B.S.G.-Press. 576 p. (In Russ.)
13.
13. Mikhailov, S. (2018). Creation of a system of control over the population of the USSR. Passport as a class entity. Published on 08.06.2018. The Russian Historical Society Portal. (In Russ.) URL: https://historyrussia.org/tsekh-istorikov/sozdanie-sistemykontrolya-nad-naseleniem-v-sssr-pasport-kak-klassovaya-sushchnost.html
14.
14. Jilas, M. (2002). Conversations with Stalin. Moscow: Centerpolygraph. 222 p. (In Russ.)
15.
15. Pushchaev, Yu. V. (2020). Soviet Dostoevsky: Dostoevsky in Soviet culture, ideology and philosophy. Philosophical Journal, 4, 102–118. (In Russ.)
16.
16. Bulgakov, M. A., & Bulgakova, E. S. (2022). Diary of the Master and Margarita. Foreword, comment. by B. V. Sokolov. Moscow: AST Publishing House. 464 p. (In Russ.)
17.
17. Mitrofanov, A. (2019). Everyday life of a Soviet communal apartment. Moscow: Young Guard. 427 p. (In Russ.)
18.
18. Bulgakov, M. A. (1926). Traktat o zhilishche. Moscow; Leningrad: Land and Factory. 31 p. (In Russ.)
19.
19. Granin, D. A. (1984). Leningrad catalog: essay. Neva, 9, 65–84. (In Russ.)
20.
20. Peshkova, N. P., & Davletova, I. A. (2023). Precedent text perception strategies in the conditions of the information society (based on the results of experimental studies 2012–2022). Journal of psycholinguistics, 4(58), 26–45. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30982/2077-5911-2023-58-4-26-45
21.
21. Anisimova, T. V., & Chubay, S. A. (2023). Precedent Texts as a Means of Increasing the Efficiency of Social Advertising. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, 22(2), 122–139. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2023.2.10
22.
22. Mullinova, O. A., Mullinova, T. A., & Vorobyov, A. E. (2021). Precedent texts in newspaper headlines: sources and the problem of recognition. Humanities and social sciences, 88(5), 94–100. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18522/2070-1403-2021-88-5-94-100
23.
23. Cherepanova, L. V. (2023). Precedent Phenomena in Teaching Russian Language. Scholarly Notes of Transbaikal State University, 18(4), 128–136. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21209/2658-7114-2023-18-4-128-136
24.
24. Ermakova, M. A. (2020). School literature as a source of precedent texts. CITISE`, 4, 307–320. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.15350/2409-7616.2020.4.27
25.
25. Mishatina, N. L. (Scientific. ed.). (2017). Methodological linguoconceptology: results and development prospects. Monograph. St. Petersburg: Book House LLC. 450 p. (In Russ.).14. Jilas, M. (2002). Conversations with Stalin. Moscow: Centerpolygraph. 222 p. (In Russ.)