Authors
- Varlamova Alla Igorevna PhD in Pedagogy, PhD in Pedagogy
- Manvelova Irina Aleksandrovna
Annotation
Due to the sudden outbreak of a pandemic around the world, many different issues, which no one had thought about before, arose in particular in the field of higher
education. First of all, the matter of further higher education existence as a social institution. In this regard, this article is aimed at identifying possible negative consequences for higher educational institutions and determining further development paths so that students can continue and successfully complete their education. In this regard, it was relevant for the authors of this article to refer to the experience of the countries of Latin America and the Caribbean, according
to which the International Institute for Higher Education of this region prepared and published a report on the impact of COVID-19 on the sphere of higher education. The leading method in the study was the method of analysis and synthesis of the studied experience. The materials presented in the article make it possible to determine
the short-term, medium-term and long-term prospects for the functioning of higher education institutions in a pandemic and summarize the potential risks for all participants of the educational process: students and future applicants, faculties, service personnel, as well as higher educational institutions with their infrastructure and technical capacities. The authors of the article tried to reveal the consequences of the temporary interruption of education, which in the medium term will lead to a drop in demand, and in the long term may affect the economies of countries as a whole, with a further increase in unemployment and the impoverishment of many families.
How to link insert
Varlamova, A. I. & Manvelova, I. A. (2021). CONSEQUENCES OF THE CORONAVIRUS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 4 (58), . https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2021.58.4.04
References
1.
1. Prem, K., Liu, Y., Russell, T. W., Kucharski, A. J., Eggo, R. M., Davies, N., Flasche, S., Clifford, S., Pearson, C. A., & Munday, J. D. (2020). The Effect of Control Strategies to Reduce Social Mixing on Outcomes of the COVID-19 Epidemic in Wuhan, China: A Modelling Study. Lancet Public Health, 5, 261–270. http://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30073-6
2.
2. Stukeley, W. (2004). Memoir of Sir Isaac Newton’s Life. Royal Society Library.
3.
3. Ferreyra, M. M., Avitabile, C., Botero Álvarez, J., Haimovich Paz, F., & Urzúa, S. (2017). At a Crossroads: Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean. Directions in Development. Human Development. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. http://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1014-5
4.
4. Marinoni, G., & Land, H. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on Global Higher Education. International Higher Education, Special Issue, 7–9.
5.
5. Ohei, K. N., & Brink, R. (2019). Web 3.0 and Web 2.0 technologies in higher educational institute: Methodological concept towards a framework development for adoption. International Journal for Infonomics, 12(1), 1841–1853.
6.
6. Hyler, M. E. (2020). Preparing educators for the time of COVID and beyond. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43 (4), 457–465. http://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1816961
7.
7. Naresh, R. (2020). Education after COVID-19 Crisis Based on ICT Tools Purakala. UGC Care Journal, 31(37), 464–468.
8.
8. Watts, L. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in distance learning: A review of the literature. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 17(1), 23–32.
9.
9. Espino-Díaz, L, Alvarez-Castillo, J. L., Gonzalez-Gonzalez, H., Hernandez-Lloret, C.-M., & Caminero-Fermandez-Caminero, G. (2020). Creating Interactive Learning Environments through the Use of Information and Communication Technologies Applied to Learning of Social Values: An Approach from Neuro-Education. Social Sciences, 9(5), 72. http://doi.org/10.3390/socsci9050072
10.
10. Kompen, R. T., Edrisingha, P., Canaleta, X., Alsina, M., & Monguet, J. M. (2019). Personal learning Environments based on Web 2.0 services in higher education. Telematics and Informatics, 38, 194–206. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.003
11.
11. Kaaki, W. (2019). Adjunct Online Faculty and Online Student Grades. Distance Learning, 17(1), 45–49.
12.
12. Yen, S. C., Lo, Y., Lee, A., & Enriquez, J. (2018). Learning online, offline, and inbetween: comparing student academic outcomes and course satisfaction in face-to-face, online, and blended teaching modalities. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 2141–2153.
13.
13. Cohen, A. (2017). Analysis of student activity in web-supported courses as a tool for predicting dropout. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(5), 1–20.
14.
14. Deming, D. J., & Figlio, D. (2016). Accountability in U. S. Higher Education: Applying Lessons from K-12 Experience to Higher Education. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 33–56. http://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.3.33
15.
15. Ferreyra, M. M., & Liang, P. (2012). Information Asymmetry and Equilibrium Monitoring in Education. Journal of Public Economics, 96(1), 237–254. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.07.012
16.
16. Gutierrez, S. C. (2018). Student Mobility in North America. Patlani Mexican survey of international student mobility, 85–96.
17.
17. Teo, T., Sang, G., Mei, B., & Hoi, C.K.W. (2019). Investigating pre-service teachers’ acceptance of Web 2.0 technologies in their future teaching: A Chinese perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 530–546. http://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1489290
18.
18. Wetcho, S., & Sangkhla, J. N. (2019). A proposed Framework of Online Collaborative Note-Taking Strategy in Self-Regulation Learning to Promote Instructional Design Practice for Preservice Teachers. Distance Learning, 17(1), 482–490.
19.
19. Aljawarnech, S. A. (2020). Reviewing and exploring innovative ubiquitous learning tools in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(4), 11–20. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09207-0
20.
20. Jaume, D., & Willén, A. (2019). The Long-Run Effects of Teacher Strikes: Evidence from Argentina. J. The University of Chicago, Labor Econ, 37(4), 1097–1139. http://doi.org/10.1086/703134
21.
21. Ortega-Sánchez, D., & Gómez-Trigueros, I. M. (2019). Massive Open Online Courses in the Initial Training of Social Science Teachers: Experiences, Methodological Conceptions, and Technological Use for Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 11(3), 578. http://doi.org/10.3390/su11030578
22.
22. Fung Tam, A. C. (2021). Students’ perceptions of and learning practices in online timed take-home examinations during COVID-19. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(4). http://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1928599
23.
23. Harris, A. L, & Rea, A. (2019). Web 2.0 and virtual world technologies: A growing impact on IS education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 137–144.
24.
24. Arguello, G., Mendez, & Maria G. (2019). Virtual Advising: A tool for Retention, Engagement, and Success for the Graduate Distance Learner. Distance Learning, 16(2), 51–57.