Authors
- Serebryakova Narine V. PhD in Pedagogy
- Shashkina Gulnara R. PhD in Pedagogy
Annotation
Theoretical knowledge and practical competencies of students are a priority in the struggle of universities for high ratings. This is of key importance in the study and formation of their readiness to accompany children with disabilities in an inclusive educational environment. However, the existing possibilities of organizing correctional care for children with tempo-rhythmic disorders in the educational space of the city are insufficiently developed. The development of private educational practice and the pursuit of individual forms of work with stuttering children is an alternative opportunity to provide professional assistance to children with stuttering. The purpose of the study was to identify and analyze the readiness of students — future speech therapists — for pedagogical support of children with tempo-rhythmic disorders in various types of institutions (special and inclusive), as well as to substantiate the concept of practice-oriented learning. The main methods were a questionnaire in the form of a Google form and its analysis. There were 50 questions in total, 45 of them included questions with one correct answer out of three suggested. The last 5 questions were for a free short answer, where it was necessary to express your point of view on the problem under discussion. The results of studying the question of the desire and opportunity to work with stuttering people of different ages showed that 76,3 % of students answer this question affirmatively, 16,6 % of students did not decide on the contingent, and 7,1 % gave a negative answer. Analyzing the students’ answer to the question about the age of stuttering, it can be noted that 69,1% of students choose preschool age, 21,4 % of students would like to work with younger schoolchildren and 9,5 % — with teenagers. An analysis of the answers to the study of the most interesting approaches to the correction of stuttering showed that 85,7 % of students were almost unanimous in their opinion about the priority of an integrated approach to the correction of stuttering of people of different ages, 9,5 % voted for the pedagogical approach and 4,8 % of students chose the psychotherapeutic approach. The question of students’ participation in scientific conferences showed that 78,6 % of students would like to participate in the work of scientific events of the Department of Speech Therapy not only as listeners, but also as speakers, 11,9 % of students gave a negative answer and 9,5 % replied that they could not answer accurately and abstained. To improve the quality of the formation of professional competencies of future speech therapists, it is necessary not only to acquaint them with the options for providing such assistance, but also to form an understanding of the “pluses” and “minuses” of the specifics of the work of a speech therapist in different types of institutions. The article proposes the concept of a comprehensive analysis of students’ priorities when accompanying children with tempo-rhythmic disorders and substantiates the effectiveness of a practice-oriented learning model.
How to link insert
Serebryakova, N. V. & Shashkina, G. R. (2022). DETECTING READINESS IN STUDENTS FOR PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 16(4), 169. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2022.16.4.10
References
1.
1. Anderson, A. (2019). Advancing Global Citizenship Education Through Global Competence and Critical Literacy: Innovative Practices for Inclusive Childhood Education. SAGE Open, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019826000
2.
2. Collier, S. (2011). Post-soviet social. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691148304.001.0001
3.
3. Froumin, I., & Remorenko, I. (2020). From the “Best-in-the World” Soviet School to a Modern Globally Competitive School System. In Reimers, F. (Ed.). Audacious Education Purposes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41882-3_9
4.
4. Silova, I., & Palandjian, G. (2018). Imperio soviético, infancia y educación. Revista Española De Educación Comparada, (31), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.5944/reec.31.2018.21592
5.
5. Rao, K., & Meo, G. (2016). Using Universal Design for Leaning to Design Standards-Based Lessons. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016680688
6.
6. Barannikov, K. A., Sulejmanov, R. S., Lesin, S. M., & Kupriyanov R. B. (2020). Learning analytics as a way to improve the efficiency of the education management system. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 20: Pedagogical education, 2, 16–33. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.51314/2073-2635-2020-2-16-33
7.
7. Bogdanova, T. G., Huseynova, A. A., & Nazarova N. M. (2019). Pedagogy of inclusive education. Moscow: INFRA-M. 335 p. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12737/20170
8.
8. Malofeev, N. N. (2018). From equal rights to equal opportunities, from a special school to inclusion. Proceedings of the Russian State Pedagogical University named after A. I. Herzen, 190, 8–15. (In Russ.). https://lib.herzen.spb.ru/media/magazines/contents/1/190/malofeev_190_8_15.pdf
9.
9. Evtushenko, I. V. (2016). To develop the competencies of specialists in the field of early assistance to children with disabilities and children at risk. Modern problems of science and education, 2, 211–220. (In Russ.). https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=24279
10.
10. Vakorina, L. Yu., Prikhodko, O. G., & Yugova, O. V. (2019). Psychological-medicalpedagogical commissions in the context of inclusive education: key performance indicators. Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Sociology, 19(4), 814–824. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2019-19-4-814-824
11.
11. Ekzhanova, E. A., & Reznikova, E. V. (2018). A Model of Pedagogical Support by a Teacher-Tutor of Children with Disabilities in the Conditions of Integrated Education. Special Education, 4(52), 21–40. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26170/sp18-04-02
12.
12. Ivenskikh, I. V., Sorokoumova, S. N., & Suvorova, O. V. (2018). Professional readiness of future teachers to work with students with disabilities in the context of inclusive practice. Bulletin of Minin University, vol. 6, 1(22), 12. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26795/2307-1281-2018-6-1-12
13.
13. Engel, A., Barnett, W. S., Anders, Y., & Taguma. M. (2015). Early Childhood Education and Care Policy Review: Norway. OECD, 137. https://www.oecd.org/norway/Early-Childhood-Education-and-Care-Policy-Review-Norway.pdf
14.
14. Vermeer, H. J., Ijzendoorn, M. H., Carcamo, R. A., & Harrison, L. J. (2016). Quality of child care using the environment rating scales: a meta-analysis of international studies. International Journal of Early Childhood, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia, 48(1), 33–60. https://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/publications/quality-of-child-care-using-theenvironment-rating-scales-a-meta-
15.
15. Prikhodko, O. G., Pyankova, A. V., & Filatova, I. A. (2020). Using digital technologies for formation of oral speech in hearing-impaired pre-school children
by a speech therapist. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Yekaterinburg, Atlantis Press. 217–222. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42959243
16.
16. St. Louis, K. O., Myers, F. L., Bakker, K., & Raphael, L. (2007). Understanding and treating cluttering. In Conture, E. G., Curlee, R. F. (Eds.). Stuttering and Related Disorders of Fluency. NY-Stuttgart: Thieme, 308–311. https://www.worldcat.org/title/stuttering-and-related-disorders-of-fluency/oclc/84713076
17.
17. International Cluttering Association (2011). Webmaster Bakker K., USA. http://associations. missouristate.edu/ICA
18.
18. Ward, D., & Scott K. S. (Eds.) (2011). Cluttering: A handbook of research, intervention and education. Hove and N. Y.: Psychology Press, Taylor & Frances Group. 328. https://www.routledge.com/Cluttering-A-Handbook-of-Research-Intervention-and-Education/Ward-Scott/p/book/9781848720299
19.
19. Kiseleva, N., Serebryakova, N., Shashkina, G., & Skivitskaya, M. (2021). Professional training of future speech therapists for work in the inclusive educational environment of a city. Education and City: Education and Quality of Living in the City: The Third Annual International Symposium, Moscow, August 24–26, 2020. Moscow: SHS Web of Conferences. 4004. https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2021/09/shsconf_ec2020_04004.pdf
20.
20. Butko G. A., Kiseleva, N. Yu., & Shashkina, G. R. (2022). Pedagogical Olympiad — a tool for assessing professional competencies. Pedagogy, 86(2), 72–83. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=48168375
21.
21. Serebriakova, N. V., & Shashkina, G. R. (2021). Teaching stuttering children in the educational space of the city. Speech therapy: modern look and contours of the future. Proceedings of the II All-Russian scientific and practical conference with international participation, Moscow, November 01–02, 2021 (pp. 323–327). Moscow: Moscow Pedagogical State University. (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovremennyetehnologii-reabilitatsii-doshkolnikov-s-zaikaniem-v-usloviyah-inklyuzivnogo-obrazovaniya
22.
22. Almazova, A. A., Filatova, Y. O., & Novitskaia I. V. (2022). The Current State, Problems and Prospects of Master’s Degree Programs in Speech-Language Pathology in Russia. Strategies for Policy in Science and Education, 30(1), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.53656/str2022-1-3-cur