Home Releases 17(1)

CITY UNIVERSITY AND CREATIVE INDUSTRIES: INTERACTION FOR DEVELOPMENT

Pedagogical Education , UDC: 37.072 DOI: 10.25688/2076-9121.2023.17.1.01

Authors

  • Krishtofik Irina Sergeevna PhD in Pedagogy, Associate Professor
  • Belolutskaya Anastasia K. Candidate of Psychological Sciences
  • Mkrtchyan Vardigul Argamovna

Annotation

The relevance of the study is due to the growing creativity of the modern labor market and the role played by the city university in the development of the economy of the capital. The objectives of the study were to identify employers’ ideas about the competencies necessary for the development of this area; in determining the staffing needs of employers; in clarifying the attitude of representatives of the creative industries to cooperation with universities. During the study, a specially developed package of tools was used: a questionnaire for representatives of the creative industries, question guides for focus groups and semi-structured interviews with employers. The study of the request of employers was carried out in the spring of 2022. In total, 75 people from the fields of design, media, performing arts, film and animation, information technology and videogames, cultural heritage conservation, education in the creative industries and a number of others took part in it. As a result, it was revealed that the most demanded and at the same time problematic competencies for the creative industries of Moscow are communicative, organizational, managerial and self-competencies. There is also a contradiction between the emerging demand for creative workers capable of providing technological breakthroughs, and the uncertain needs of employers to fine-tune the mechanisms of interaction with universities, whose educational programs lag behind the real practice of creative industries. From a practical point of view, the results obtained make it possible to isolate the area of deficits in the interaction between the city university and employers in the field of the creative economy, to determine the directions for changing the content and learning technologies to solve the problem of providing the modern labor market with in-demand personnel. The created research tools and procedures can later form the basis for developing a system for monitoring the compliance of the results of the work of the city university with the demand of the labor market of the creative industries.

How to link insert

Krishtofik, I. S., Belolutskaya, A. K. & Mkrtchyan, V. A. (2023). CITY UNIVERSITY AND CREATIVE INDUSTRIES: INTERACTION FOR DEVELOPMENT Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 17(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2023.17.1.01
References
1. 1. Balmasova, T. A. (2016). «Third Mission» of the University — a New Vector of Development? Higher Education in Russia, 8–9(204), 48–55. (In Russ.). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tretya-missiya-universiteta-novyy-vektor-razvitiya
2. 2. Etzkowitz, H. (2011). Triple Helix Model. Innovation, 4(150), 5–10. (In Russ.). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/model-troynoy-spirali
3. 3. Unger M., & Polt W. (2017). The Knowledge Triangle between Research, Education and Innovation — A Conceptual Discussion. Foresight and STI Governance, 11(2), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2017.2.10.26
4. 4. Kudryashova, E. V., Sorokin, S. E., & Bugaenko, O. D. (2020). University-Industry Interaction as an Element of the University’s “Third Mission». Higher Education in Russia, 29(5), 9–21. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-5-9-21
5. 5. Epure, M. (2017). University-business cooperation: adapting the curriculum and educational package to labor market requirements. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 11(1) 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1515/picbe-2017-0036
6. 6. Pesha, A. V., Kamarova, T. A., & Patutina, S. Yu. (2019). Road map of interaction between a higher educational institution, employers and students in the conditions of modern innovative economy. Modern education, 1, 48–62. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-8736.2019.1.24354
7. 7. Sanahuja Vélez, G., & Ribes Giner. G. (2015). Effects of business internships on students, employers, and higher education institutions: A systematic review. Journal of employment counseling, 52(3), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/joec.12010
8. 8. Gruzdev, M. V., Kuznetsova, I. V., Tarkhanova, I. Y., & Kazakova, E. I. (2018). University Graduates’ Soft Skills: The Employers’ Opinion. European journal of contemporary education, 7(4), 690–698. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2018.4.690
9. 9. Souto-Otero, M., & Enders, J. (2017). International students’ and employers’ use of rankings: a cross-national analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 42(4), 783–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1074672
10. 10. Kinash, S., McGillivray, L., & Crane, L. (2018). Do university students, alumni, educators and employers link assessment and graduate employability? Higher Education Research & Development, 37(2), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1370439
11. 11. Belolutskaya, A. K. Krishtofik, I. S., & Mkrtchyan, V. A. (2022). Features of Professional Activity Reflection of the Olympiad “I Am a Professional” Participants. Higher Education in Russia, 31(1), 98–119. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-1-98-119
12. 12. Boguslavsky, M. V., Ladyzhets, N. S., Neborsky, E. V., & Sannikova, O. V. (2020). Regional University’s Role and Place in Personnel Training System in Assessments of Employers. Higher Education in Russia, 29(12), 45–56. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-12-45-56
13. 13. Danilaev, D. P., & Malivanov, N. N. (2017). The Modern Conditions and the Structure of Interaction between Universities, Students and Employers. Higher Education in Russia, 6(213), 29–35. (In Russ.). URL: https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1073
14. 14. Levina, E. V. (2019). Creativity of the labor market as a modern factor in the competitiveness of metropolitan megacities. Economy and society: modern models of development, 9(2), 177–192. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18334/ecsoc.9.2.40863
15. 15. Zelentsova, E. V., & Gladkikh, N. V. (2021). Creative Industries: Theories and Practices. Monograph. Moscow: T8RUGRAM. (In Russ.). URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46133410
16. 16. Santoro, G., Bresciani, S., & Papa, A. (2020). Collaborative modes with cultural and creative industries and innovation performance: The moderating role of heterogeneous sources of knowledge and absorptive capacity. Technovation, 92–93, 102040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.06.003
17. 17. Li, F. (2020). The digital transformation of business models in the creative industries: A holistic framework and emerging trends. Technovation, 92–93, 102012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.12.004
18. 18. Rodríguez-Gulías, M. J., Fernández-López, S., & Rodeiro-Pazos, D. (2020). Innovation in cultural and creative industries firms with an academic origin (CCI-USOs): The role of regional context. Technovation, 92–93, 102044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.06.007
19. 19. Zabortceva, T. I., & Balyazina, A. V. (2019). Creative Economy and Creative Geography: Methodological Approaches and Practice. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Earth Sciences, 29, 53–67. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3402.2019.29.53
20. 20. Schoales, J. (2022). Competing in the creative industries: Two-sided networks and the case of Hollywood. City, Culture and Society, 28, 1877–9166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2021.100439
21. 21. Linton, J. (2018). Quiet Contributors: The Role of the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences in Innovation. Foresight and STI Governance, 12(3), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2018.3.6.12
22. 22. Bokova, A. V. (2016). Creative Industries as A Complex Networking. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Cultural studies and art history, 1(21), 5–12. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17223/22220836/21/1
23. 23. Nogare, C. D., Murzyn-Kupisz, M. (2021). Do museums foster innovation through engagement with the cultural and creative industries? Journal of Cultural Economics, 45, 671–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-021-09418-3
24. 24. Park, S. H., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Cultural entrepreneurship in corporate governance practice diffusion: Framing of “independent directors” by US-listed chinese companies. Organization Science, 31(6), 1359–1384. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019
25. 25. Klein, M., Gerlitzb L., & Spychalska-Wojtkiewiczc, M. (2021). Cultural and creative industries as boost for innovation and sustainable development of companies in cross innovation process. Procedia Computer Science, 192, 4218–4226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.198
26. 26. Ashutova, T. V., & Zhelnina, Z. Yu. (2019). Strategic Project «Creative City – Territory of Development» as a Model of Interaction between Flagship University and Region. Higher Education in Russia, 28(3), 116–126. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-3-116-126
27. 27. Khlystova, O., Kalyuzhnova, Y., & Belitski, M. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the creative industries: A literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1192–1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.062
28. 28. Abramova, I. E., Shishmolina, E. P., & Nikolaeva, O. O. (2021). Professionally integrated foreign language training for hospitality students in the context of digitalization. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania = Perspectives of Science and Education, 52(4), 238–246. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2021.4.15
29. 29. Glukhov, G. V., Ermakova, Yu. D., & Kapustina, L. V. (2019). Development of professional foreign language speaking competences of students majoring in «tourism business» at the economic university. Samara Journal of Science, 8–3(28), 264–269. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2309-4370-2019-13305
30. 30. Grudzinskiy, A. O., Guskova, I. V., Serebrovskaya, N. E., & Mariko, V. V. (2020). About the Master’s Program “Creative Personnel Management”: Methodological Foundations. Higher Education in Russia, 29(11), 51–62. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-11-51-62
31. 31. Novikova, T. E., Makarova, L. S., Bureev, A. A., & Zhukovskaya, L. I. (2021). Current Trends in Journalism Education as Responding to Professional Journalistic Standards and Demands of Media Industry. Issues of theory and practice of journalism, 10(3), 558–572. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17150/2308-6203.2021.10(3).558-572
32. 32. Al-Edenat, M., & Al-Hawamdeh, N. (2021). Revisiting the entrepreneurial ventures through the adoption of business incubators by higher education institutions. International Journal of Management Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100419
33. 33. Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2019). Cultural entrepreneurship: A new agenda for the study of entrepreneurial processes and possibilities. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108539487
34. 34. Olkhovaya, T. A., Zinyukhina, N. A., & Nikulina, Yu. N. (2019). Cooperation Between University and Business Community: Experience and Development Priorities. Higher Education in Russia, 28(7), 139–149. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-7-139-149
35. 35. Cerisola, S. (2018). Multiple creative talents and their determinants at the local level. Journal of Cultural Economics, 42(2), 243–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-017-9299-8
36. 36. Chernykh, S. I. (2018). Social Elevators in Education: Problems and Solutions. Higher Education in Russia, 27(6), 88–95. (In Russ.). https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/1398/1148
Download file .pdf 522.47 kb