Authors
- Lukyanova Irina N.
- Stepanov Sergey Yurievich Doctor of Psychology, professor
Annotation
This article reflects the results of an experimental study of the interdependence of the parameters of reproduction and productivity of thinking of younger schoolchildren.
The relevance of the research problem is determined by the need to change the reproductive educational strategy to a productive one. The prerequisites of the study are continuously updated requirements for the educational results of students. The study was conducted on the basis of a comprehensive school, the sample consisted of 64 fourth grade students. As part of the research, an author’s program was developed, which includes subject-creative tasks based on such primary school disciplines as mathematics and the world around us. The obtained results demonstrate a direct relationship of the parameter of reproductive thinking with the parameters of its divergence, originality, criticality and adequacy.
How to link insert
Lukyanova, I. N. & Stepanov, S. Y. (2023). INTERRELATION OF INDICATORS OF PRODUCTIVE AND REPRODUCTIVE THINKING OF FOURTH-GRADE SCHOOL STUDENTS IN SOLVING SUBJECT-CREATIVE TASKS Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 17(3), 162. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2023.17.3.09
References
1.
1. Stepanov, S. Yu., Orzhekovsky, P. A., Ushakov, D. V., Ryabova, I. V., Gavrilova, E. V., Morozova, O. A., Sobolevskaya, T. A., Shepeleva, E. A., Valueva, E. A., Ovsyannikova, V. V., Mishina, I. B., Titov, N. A., & Chernysheva, L. A. (2021). Digitalization of education: psychological, pedagogical and valeological problems. Monograph. Moscow: MCU.
2.
2. Orzhekovsky, P. A., Stepanov, S. Yu., Borovskikh, T. A., Viktorova, N. V., Lavrov, A. P., Lukyanova, I. N., Mishina, I. B., Titov, N. A., Chernysheva, L. A., Shoitova, V. S., & Feshchenko, I. A. (2022). Digitalization of the dynamics of the development of schoolchildren’s thinking in educational activities. Monograph. Moscow: MPSU.
3.
3. Lukyanova, I. N. (2021). Creative task as a factor in the development of creative and reproductive thinking. In: Savenkov, A. I., & Postavnev, V. M. (Scientific Eds.). Psychology of giftedness and creativity. Collection of scientific papers of the participants of the III International Scientific and Practical Online Conference, Moscow, 2021 November 3 (pp. 154–159). (In Russ.).
4.
4. Ponomarev, Ya. A. (1969). Psychology of creative thinking. Moscow: APN RSFSR. (In Russ.)
5.
5. Davydov, V. V., & Elkonin, D. B. (1966). Age opportunities for learning. Moscow: Enlightenment. (In Russ.).
6.
6. Galperin, P. Ya., & Danilova, V. L. (1980). Education of systematic thinking in the process of solving creative problems. Questions of Psychology, 1, 31–38. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Kalmykova, Z. I. (1981). Productive thinking as the basis of learning. Moscow: Pedagogy. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Saint Petersburg: SOYUZ. (In Russ.).
9.
9. Razumovsky, V. G. (1966). Creative tasks in physics. Moscow: Enlightenment. Теория и практика об учения и воспитания 185
10.
10. Orlov, V. A. (1994) Creative experimental tasks. Physics at school. 4, 21–25; 5, 27–31; 6, 19–23.
11.
11. Orlov, V. A. (1995). Creative experimental tasks. Physics at school. 1, 28–32; 3, 24–30.
12.
12. Orzhekovsky P. A., Davydov V. N., & Titov N. A. (1998). Experimental creative tasks in inorganic chemistry. Moscow: ARKTI.
13.
13. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0063487
14.
14. Guilford, J. P. (1968). Creativity, Intelligence and Their Educational Implications. EDITS/Knapp, San Diego, CA. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446902900437
15.
15. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2018). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental approach for promoting creative productivity in young people. In: Pfeiffer, S. I., Shaunessy-Dedrick, E., & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent) (pp. 185–199). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-012
16.
16. Runco, M. N. Hao, A. J., & Tang M. (2016). The Social «Cost» of Working in Groups and Impact of Values and Creativity. Creativity. Theories-Research-Applications, 3(2), 229–243.
17.
17. Chand, I., & Runco, M. A. (1992). Problem finding skills as components in the creative process. Person. indiv. diff. 14, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90185-6
18.
18. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677
19.
19. Torrance, E. P. (1963). Education and the Creative Potential. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.
20.
20. Torrance, E. P. (1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth-grade slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quart, 12, 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698626801200401
21.
21. Nemov, R. S. (2003). Psychology. Textbook for students. higher. ped. studies. institutions: in 3 books. 4th ed. Book 1: General fundamentals of psychology. Moscow: Humanit. ed. center VLADOS. (In Russ.)
22.
22. OECD (2019). Education at a Glance, OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/f8d7880d-en
23.
23. Yang, J., & Zhao, X. (2021). The effect of creative thinking on academic performance: Mechanisms, heterogeneity, and implication. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100831
24.
24. PISA (2018). PISA-2018. Brief report on the results of the study. https://fioco.ru/Media/Default/Documents/МСИ/PISA2018РФ_Краткий%20отчет.pdf. (In Russ.).
25.
25. Mourgues, C., Tan, М., Hein, S., Elliott, J. G., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2016). Using creativity to predict future academic performance: An application of Aurora’s five subtests for creativity. Learning and Individual Differences. 51, 338–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.02.001
26.
26. Anwar, M. N., Shamim-ur-Rasool, S., & Haq, R. (2012). A comparison of creative thinking abilities of high and low achievers secondary school students. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Education, 1(1), 23–28.
27.
27. Gralewski, J., & Karwowski, M. (2012). Creativity and school grades: A case from Poland. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7(3), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.03.002
28.
28. Niaz, M., Nunez, G. S., & Pineda, I. R. (2000). Academic performance of high school students as a function of mental capacity, cognitive style, mobility-fixity dimension, and creativity. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 34(1), 18–29.
29.
29. Kaufman, J. C., Kapoor, H., Patston, T., & Cropley, D. H. (2021). Explaining standardized educational test scores: The role of creativity above and beyond GPA and personality. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000433
30.
30. Ai, X. (1999). Creativity and academic achievement: An investigation of gender differences. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 329–337.
31.
31. Hansenne, M., & Legrand, J. (2012). Creativity, emotional intelligence, and school performance in children. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 264–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2012.03.015
32.
32. Gajda А. (2016). The relationship between school achievement and creativity at different educational stages. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.12.004
33.
33. Lukyanova, I. N., & Stepanov, S. Yu. (2022). Development of reproductive and productive thinking of younger schoolchildren in solving subject-creative problems. The science. Control. Education. RF, 4(8), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.56464/2713-0487_2022_4_31. (In Russ.).
34.
34. Ushakov, D. V. (2020). On the way to a holistic vision of a person. Psychology. HSE Journal, 4, 666–629.
35.
35. Savenkov, A. I. (2018). Notes on reproductive and productive teaching methods. Researcher, 3-4, 23-24.
36.
36. Savenkov, A. I., & Obukhov, A. S. (2018). Guidelines for the preparation and holding of the All-Russian competition of research works and creative projects for preschoolers and primary schoolchildren “I am a researcher!”. Researcher, 3-4, 23–24.
37.
37. Katykhin, S. A., & Kozyreva, O. A. (2019). Healthy lifestyle as a mechanism for self-organization of the quality of adaptive and productive development and self-realization of the individual. In: Education and education in the context of the implementation of sustainable development goals. Materials of the Round Table, Ufa, 2019, October 24 (pp. 147–150). https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42425023
38.
38. Pushkareva, I. I., Goleva, O. S., & Ugolnikova, O. A. (2021) Health-forming thinking as a product of the technologization of the integrated development of the individual and society. Vestnik SibSIU, 2(36).
39.
39. Tarasova, S. A. (2021). Work with natural materials as a means of developing productive thinking. Science and Education, 4(4).
40.
40. Sergeeva, T. F. (2018). Educational environment as a space for self-realization of a gifted child. In: Bogoyavlenskaya, D. B. (Ed.). Psychology of creativity and giftedness. Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference, Moscow, 2018, April 20–21 (pp. 26–31). Moscow: Moscow State Pedagogical University. EDN UXFJQG.
41.
41. Nizamutdinova, S. M. (2021). Tasks of creative training and education in the digital age. Bulletin of the International Center of Art and Education, 2, 274–281.
42.
42. Yaroslavtseva, E. I. (2020). The potential of digital technologies and the problems of human creativity. Questions of Philosophy, 11, 58–66.
43.
43. Berseneva, N. V., & Churbanova, S. M. (2012). Age and individual opportunities for systematic research of the “creative” task by children in line with the approach of P. Ya. Galperin. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 14. Psychology, 4.
44.
44. Zhukova, E. S., Bogoyavlenskaya, D. B., & Artemenkov, S. L. (2021). Correlation of giftedness, intelligence, academic success and conscious self-regulation of educational activity. In: Psychology of self-regulation in the context of actual tasks of education (to the 90th anniversary of the birth of O. A. Konopkin). Materials of the scientific conference, Moscow, 2021, April 27–28. Moscow. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/soootnoshenieodarennosti-intellekta-akademicheskoy-uspeshnosti-i-osoznannoy-samoregulyatsii-uchebnoydeyatelnosti
45.
45. Morosanova, V. I., Fomina, T. G., & Ovanesbekova, M. L. (2018). The relationship of conscious self-regulation, motivation and personal dispositions with the academic performance of schoolchildren. Vestnik RFBR. Humanities and Social Sciences, 2, 124–133.
46.
46. Antonova, D. A., & Ospennikova, E. V. (2020). Methodological foundations of productive learning. Pedagogical education in Russia, 6.
47.
47. Semenov, I. N. (2021). Reflexive and productive goal setting of the self-concept as a system-forming factor in the transformation of giftedness into culturally creative creativity (methodology of its amateur development). In: Psychology of creativity and giftedness. Collection of articles of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation, Moscow, 2021, November 15–17 (vol. 3, part 3) (pp. 9–14). Moscow: Association
of Technical Universities. https://doi.org/10.53677/9785919160472_9_14; EDN KGXALV.
48.
48. Lukyanova, I. N., & Stepanov, S. Yu. (2022b). Development of productive and reproductive thinking of 4th grade students in solving subject-creative problems. A teaching aid. Moscow: Izvestiya IPPO. (In Russ.)
49.
49. Semenov, I. N., Zaretsky, V. K., & Stepanov, S. Yu. (1979). Productivity of reflection in discursive problem solving. In book: New Research in Psychology, 2, 7–12. (In Russ.).
50.
50. Semenov, I. N., & Stepanov, S. Yu. (1992). Reflexive psychology and pedagogy of creative thinking. Zaporozhye: ZGU. (In Russ.).
51.
51. Segundo-Marcos, R. I., López-Fernández, V., Daza-González, M. T., & Phillips-Silver, J. (2020). Promoting children’s creative thinking through reading and writing in a cooperative learning classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100663
52.
52. Sebastian, J., & Huang, H. (2016). Examining the relationship of a survey-based measure of math creativity with math achievement: Cross-national evidence from PISA 2012. International Journal of Educational Research, 80, 74–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.08.010
53.
53. Xiao-Ping, D, & Xiang-Kui, Z. (2011). Understanding the Relationship between Self-esteem and Creativity: A Meta-analysis. Advances in Psychological Science, 19(5), 645–651. (In Chinese). https://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2011/V19/I5/645
54.
54. Semenov, I. N. (1990). Problems of reflexive psychology of solving creative problems. Monograph, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, NII obshch. and ped. psychology. Moscow: NIIOPP. (In Russ.).
55.
55. Stepanov, S. Yu. (2019). On the problem of choosing a strategy for the development of digital education as a lifelong one. Continuous education: XXI century, 1(25). https://doi.org/10.15393/j5.art.2019.4464. (In Russ.)
56.
56. Rosseel, J., & Anseel, F. (2022). When Reflection Hinders Creative Problem-Solving: a Test of Alternative Reflection Strategies. J Bus Psychol, 37, 429–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-021-09741-8
57.
57. Anseel, F., & Ong, M. (2020). Reflection: Behavioral strategies to structure and accelerate learning from experience. In: Harvery, V. S. & De Meuse, K. P. (Eds.). The age of agility: Building learning agile leaders and organizations. SIOP Professional Practice Series – Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/x2mz4
58.
58. Akpur, U. (2020). Critical, Reflective, Creative Thinking and Their Reflections on Academic Achievement. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100683
59.
59. Wang, Y., & Wang, L. (2016). Self-construal and creativity: The moderator effect of self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 184–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.086
60.
60. Robinson, K. (2011) A new look at the education system [Video]. Yandex. https://yandex.ru/video/preview/1630730008064877337