Authors
- Bulat Roman E. Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor
- Baychorova Khafiza S. Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences
Annotation
The relevance of the study is substantiated by the objective need to improve scientific and methodological support of general education teachers. The revival of methodological service announced by the Minister of Education of the Russian Federation in 2022 predetermines the study of the dynamics of the teachers’ needs within their professional activity. This study is aimed at the quest for potential of teachers’ methodological support through revitalization of the activities of representatives of methodological structures, as well as improvement of means, forms and methods of their interaction. The main research method is survey of teachers within the framework of the establishing experiment. The theoretical conclusions based on the scientific literature review were confirmed by the results of the survey of 128 teachers
of general education. The article reveals the need to integrate the methodological structures of all levels into a single holistic system, to update the content and the organizational model of methodological work, as well as the scientific and methodological support of the educational process. It is proved that the objective need to improve the quality of general education predetermines the need to increase the competence of all educational stakeholders, including methodologists, whose underperformance in the field of didactics negatively affects the quality of work of educational organizations. The article also substantiates the need to upgrade the work
status of full-time methodologists and consolidate their functions legally. The research findings clarify the functions of the methodologist, which must be aimed at close collaboration with other categories of pedagogical workers, playing an advanced role in digital didactics, as well as providing targeted support to teachers.
How to link insert
Bulat, R. E. & Baychorova, K. S. (2024). THE POTENTIAL OF METHODOLOGICAL SUPPORT OF GENERAL EDUCATION TEACHERS Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 18 (2), 83. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2024.18.2.05
References
1.
1. Vachkova, S. N., Petryaeva, E. Yu., & Yashina, I. A. (2021). Influence of the “Moscow electronic school” on the activities of the teacher. MCU Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology, 4(58), 10–25. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2021.58.4.01
2.
2. Oboskalov, A. G., Makoveckaja, Ju. G., & Serikova, V. I. (2021). Monitoring the effectiveness of the model of methodological work in the education system of the Chelyabinsk region: problems and prospects. Metodist, 10, 6–9. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/cnyhbh
3.
3. Copridge, K. W., Uttamchandani, S., & Birdwell, T. (2021). Faculty Reflections of Pedagogical Transformation in Active Learning Classrooms. Innov High Educ, 46, 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09544-y
4.
4. Lucas, M., Bem-Haja, P., Siddiq, F., Moreira, A., & Redecker, C. (2021). The relation between in-service teachers’ digital competence and personal and contextual factors: what matters most? Computers & Education, 160. https://doi.org/10.1016.compedu.2020.104052
5.
5. Tondeur, J., Howard, S., & Yang, J. (2020). One-size does not fit all: towards an adaptive model to develop preservice teachers’ digital competencies. Computers in Human Behavior, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106659
6.
6. Birdwell, T., & Uttamchandani, S. (2019). Learning to teach in space: Design principles for faculty development in active learning classrooms. Journal of Learning Spaces, 8(1), 19–27.
7.
7. Oh, E., & Reeves, T. (2010). The implications of the differences between design research and instructional systems design for educational technology researchers and practitioners. Educational Media International, 47(4), 263–275.
8.
8. Kladova, I. S. (2022). Methodological monitoring as a practice of targeted work with educational institutions. Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie, 4(42), 57–61. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/wvogpx
9.
9. Damen, N., & Toh, C. (2019). Looking for inspiration: Understanding the information evaluation and seeking behavior of novice designers during creative idea generation. Proc. of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 1(1), 1793–1802.
10.
10. Kwon, E., Rao, V., & Goucher-Lambert, K. (2023). Understanding inspiration: Insights into how designers discover inspirational stimuli using an AI-enabled platform. Design Studies, 88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2023.101202
11.
11. Savard, I., Bourdeau, J., & Paquette, G. (2020). Considering cultural variables in the instructional design process: A knowledge-based advisor system. Computers & Education, 145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103722
12.
12. Gribtsova, Y. V. (2023). Additional education methodological support of teachers as an element of the continuous professional development system: the experience of the Lipetsk region. Vestnik GOU DPO TO “IPK i PPRO TO”, 2, 23–26. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/vemukd
13.
13. Tetina, S. V., & Gutrova, Yu. V. (2021). Organization of methodical work in the municipality in the context of the implementation and realization system of methodical services. Bulletin of pedagogical sciences, 6, 224–229. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/gfekzo
14.
14. Domashenko, I. V. (2021). Actual approaches to the development of professional competence of methodologists of municipal methodological services in the system of postgraduate professional education. Nauchnaja sokrovishhnica obrazovanija Donetchiny, 1, 69–74. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/bdoqek
15.
15. Baker, V. L., & Lutz, Ch. (2021). Faculty Development Post COVID-19: A Cross-Atlantic Conversation and Call to Action. The Journal of the Professoriate, 12(1), 55–79.
16.
16. Rubach, C., & Lazarides, R. (2021). Addressing 21st-century digital skills in schools — development and validation of an instrument to measure teachers’ basic ICT competence beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106636
17.
17. Lantz-Andersson, A., Skantz-Åberg, E., Roka, A., Lundin, M., & Williams, P. (2022). Teachers’ collaborative reflective discussions on technology-mediated teaching: Envisioned and enacted transformative agency. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100645
18.
18. Belyaeva, A. V., Panina, E. S., Savonina D. R., & Chuzhinenko, A. S. (2023). Current tasks of methodological support of teaching activities. Socialʼnye otnošeniâ, 3(46), 98–107. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/sqdprb
19.
19. UNESCO (2023). Global education monitoring report summary, 2023: technology in education: a tool on whose terms? Paris, UNESCO. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.54676/AATW1274
20.
20. Pirozhkova, O. B. (2022). Transformation of the methodological service in the conditions of creating a unified system of scientific and methodological support for pedagogical staff and managerial personnel. Kubanskaâ škola, 3(67), 63–66. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/ityunp
21.
21. Sushnikova, O. V. (2022). Role of the district methodological association in increasing the professional competence of teachers. Obrazovanie v Kirovskoj oblasti, 4(64), 60–61. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/jaxjtd
22.
22. Angelina, V. Z. (2023). Organization of methodological activity in the region: priorities, opportunities, problems. In: IV Avdeevskie chtenija. Sbornik materialov Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, posvjashhennoj Godu kul’turnogo nasledija narodov Rossii, 85-letiju so dnja osnovanija Dvorca detskogo tvorchestva im. F. I. Avdeevoj goroda Jakutska, Yakutsk, 2022, November 22–23 (pp. 21–27). Yakutsk: North-Eastern Federal University named after M. K. Ammosov. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/voynjy
23.
23. Modestova, T. V. (2023). On the effectiveness of methodological support of teachers. Geografiâ v škole, 6, 23–31. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/ 10.47639/0016-7207_2023_6_23. https://elibrary.ru/efmvid
24.
24. Ganaeva E. A., & Zabavina, S. V. (2018). Problems and prospects of development of municipal methodical service. Modernizacija regional’nogo obrazovanija: opyt pedagogov Orenburzh’ja, 4(20), 6–16. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/tyhqqz
25.
25. Charneckaja, Zh. N., & Galeeva, N. L. (2023). Scientific and methodological work in a modern school: new or topical? In: Shamovskie chtenija. Sbornik statej XV Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, Moscow, 2023, January 21–25 (in 2 ch., ch. 2., pp. 434–438. Moscow: 5 for knowledge. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/hlpkao
26.
26. Frolov, I. N. (2011). Unified information methodological space region as a way to improve the level methodology competent teacher. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 8(4), 52.
27.
27. Baranov, P. A. (2021). Basic stages and trends in the development of the methodical service of the St. Petersburg School (1800–1990). Prepodovanie istorii v škole, 3, 9–13. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/xdfsvr
28.
28. Karakchieva, M. A., Bulat, R. E., & Baychorova, Kh. S. (2022). Normative-legal bases of development of higher education quality based on activation of specialists’ activity in the field of methodical work. In: Bulat, R. E. (General Eds). Psihologo-pedagogicheskie aspekty podgotovki kadrov k professional’noj
dejatel’nosti v jekstremal’nyh uslovijah. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov Mezhdunarodnoj NPK, St. Petersburg, 2022, May 13 (pp. 140–146). St. Petersburg: SPbU GPS of the EMERCOM of Russia: NPO PB AS. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/etuwhg
29.
29. McKenney, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2013). Systematic review of design-based research progress: Is a little knowledge a dangerous thing? Educational Researcher, 42(2), 97–100.
30.
30. Vannovskaya, O. V., Bulat, R. Е., & Baychorova, Kh. S. (2023). Development of communicative competence of developers of educational and methodological materials for dot through socio-psychological training. Pushkin Leningrad State University journal, 2, 187–207. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.35231/18186653_2023_2_187
31.
31. Chiu, P. H. P., Im, S. W. T., & Shek, C. H. (2022). Disciplinary variations in student perceptions of active learning classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100131
32.
32. Buchek, A. A. (2023). Development of methodological support service in the context of strengthening the sovereign education system. Modern additional professional pedagogical education, 6, 3(22), 71–80. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/hlyvrr
33.
33. Barybina, I. S., Lebedkina, V. B., & Ovsyannikova, E. M. (2022). The activities of the methodological service to improve the professional competence of teachers in the conditions of the federal state educational standard. Aktualʼnye issledovaniâ, 3(82), 66–68. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/zghnqt
34.
34. Klyuchnikova, O. V., & Dendeber, S. V. (2021). Evaluation of the effectiveness of municipal methodological services in the Voronezh region. Naučno-metodičeskaâ rabota v obrazovatelʼnoj organizacii, 1(9), 25–28. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/tinmtq
35.
35. Shontukova, I. V. (2023). Methodological support for teachers: regional problems, tasks and models. Pedagogics, 87(2), 67–75. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/rqycvl
36.
36. Modestova, T. V. (2023). On the effectiveness of methodological support of teachers. Geografiâ v škole, 6, 23–31. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.47639/0016-7207_2023_6_23
37.
37. Vagajceva, E. S. (2023). Lichnostno orientirovannaja model’ metodicheskoj sluzhby obrazovatel’nogo uchrezhdenija kak faktor povyshenija kachestva obrazovanija. Flagman nauki, 7(7), 209–215. (In Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/njnsvs