Home страница → Archive → Undergraduates' Response to Project-Based Learning: Perceptions of Pedagogies of Engagement

Undergraduates' Response to Project-Based Learning: Perceptions of Pedagogies of Engagement

The History of Pedagogical and Psychological Education , UDC: 37.091.33 DOI: 10.25688/2076-9121.2019.48.2.09

Authors

  • Haas Lory Е.
  • Lasley Elizabeth

Annotation

Project-based learning is a student-centered instructional model where students are im­mersed in authentic learning experiences versus traditional pedagogical approaches in edu­cation. In this paper, theoretical foundations of Project-based learning are discussed to ren­der information as to the benefits of implementing Project-based learning as a more effective and meaningful learning model. Project-based learning draws on situated learning and con-structivist theories as metacognitive supports. Through understanding the benefits of this interactive learning approach educators can design and implement learning opportunities to increase and sustain knowledge acquisition and develop critical thinking.
References
1. American Association of Colleges and Universities. College learning for the new global century. Washington, DC: AACU, 2007
2. Bransford J.D., Brown A.L., CockingR.R. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Expe­rience, and School (Expanded edition). Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.
3. Brown A., Collin P., Duguid P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning // Educational Researcher. 1989. № 18 (1). P. 32-42.
4. Costa A.L., Kallick B. Habits of mind, Across the curriculum, Alexandria, VA:
5. ASCD, 2008.
6. Deci E.L. Why we do what we do; Understanding self-motivation. London, UK: Penquin, 1995.
7. Dewey J. Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: Macmillan, 1916.
8. Doyle T., Zakrajsek T. The new science of learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus, 2008.
9. Flecky K. Foundations of service-learning // Service-Learning in occupational therapy education / eds. K. Flecky & L. Gitlow. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett, 2011.
10. P. 1-12.
11. Giroux H. On critical pedagogy. New York, NY: Continuum, 2011.
12. 10. Hammerness K. et al. How Teachers Learn and Develop // Preparing Teachers for a Changing World, What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do / eds. Linda Darling-Hammond & John Bransford. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2005.
13. 11. Hmelo-Silver C.E. Problem-based learning: What and how students learn // Educa­tional Psychology Review. 2004. № 16 (3). P. 235-266.
14. 12. Hung D. Situated cognition and problem-based learning // Handbook of research on educational communications and technology / eds. J.M. Spector, J.G. van Merrienboer, M.D. Merrill, & M. Driscoll. 3rd ed. New York: Erlbaum, 2002. P. 485-506.
15. 13. Hursh D. Exacerbating inequality: The failed promise of the No Child Left Behind
16. Act // Race, Ethnicity and Education, 2007. № 10 (3). P. 295-308.
17. 14. Jonassen D.H. Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? // Educational Technology Research and Development. 1991. № 39(3). P. 5-14.
18. 15. Kolb D.A. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and develop­ment. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1984.
19. 16. Lee J.S., Blackwell S., Drake J., Moran K.A. Taking a leap of faith: Redefining teaching and learning in higher education through project-based learning // The Interdiscip­linary Journal of Problem-based Learning. 2014. № 8 (2). P. 19-34.
20. 17. Marzano R.J. Designing a New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Thousand
21. Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 2000.
22. 18. Moore B., Stanley T. Critical thinking and formative assessments: Increasing the rigor in your classroom. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education, 2010.
23. 19. NoddingsN. Happiness and education. New York: Cambridge University, 2003.
24. 20. Price D. Learning Futures: rebuilding curriculum and pedagogy around student engagement // FORUM. 2011. № 53 (2). P. 273-284.
25. 21. Saks K., Leijen A. Distinguishing self-directed and self-regulation learning and mea­suring them in the E-learning context // Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014. № 112 (1). P. 190-198.
26. 22. Vygotsky L.S. Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986.
27. 23. Wagner T. Creating Innovators — The Making of Young People Who Will Change the World. New York: Scribner, 2012.
28. 24. WeimerM. Learner-centered Teaching, Five Key Changes in Practice. San Francis­co, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2002.
29. 25. Wolters C. Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning // Educational Psychologist. 2003. № 38. P. 189-205.
30. 26. Zull J. The art of changing the brain: Enriching teaching by exploring the biology of learning. Sterling Virginia: Stylus, 2002.
Download file .pdf 250.53 kb