Home → Releases → № 3 (57) →

Student evaluation of the quality of education in high school: applications

Pedagogical Education , UDC: 378.4 DOI: 10.25688/2076-9121.2021.57.3.01

Authors

  • Belolutskaya Anastasia K. PhD in Pedagogy, Associate Professor
  • Krishtofik Irina Sergeevna PhD in Pedagogy, Associate Professor
  • Mkrtchyan Vardigul Argamovna

Annotation

Abstract. Presented a study on the problem of student assessment the quality of higher education in the context of the requirements of the professional standard "Teacher". The relevance of the study is due to the desire of modern universities to manage the quali­ty on the basis of taking into account the assessments of various stakeholders, among whom students, being direct participants in the learning process, can become a source of the most complete information about the quality of education. The study is aimed at analyzing the possibility of attracting students to the procedure for an independent as­sessment the quality of education and professional training. The research was carried out on the basis of competence-based and system-activity approaches using the survey method. The article examines the results of student assessment of teaching modules / disciplines, practices and independent work of students according to five criteria: organization, quali­ty of content, effectiveness, satisfaction and professional motivation. Conclusions are formulated about the lack of objectivity of independent student assessment; insufficient degree of formation of students' ideas about the principles of organizing an activity-based problem-oriented learning process. An assumption is made about the low criticality of stu­dents in relation to the effectiveness of their educational activities and the insufficient level of formation of professional reflection of future teachers. The possibilities of including stu­dent assessment as one of the elements in the system of independent assessment of the quali­ty of education at a university are discussed, subject to the conditions of complexity and diversity.
Tags:
content of independent work , organization of practice , professional orientation , professional standard , quality of higher education , student assessment , teaching efficiency

How to link insert

Belolutskaya, A. K., Krishtofik, I. S. & Mkrtchyan, V. A. (2021). Student evaluation of the quality of education in high school: applications Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 3 (57), 11-32. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2021.57.3.01
References
1. Agranat, Yu. V., & Ivanova, L. V. (2019). Student assessment of teachers in the context of raising education quality [Otsenka prepodavatelei studentami v kontekste povy-sheniia kachestva obrazovaniia]. Pedagogy. Theory & Practice [Pedagogika: Voprosy teorii ipraktiki], 4 (3), 68-72. (In Russian). DOI: 10.30853/pedagogy.2019.3.13
2. Bannikov, S. A. (2016). Problems and prospects of quality management system of higher education in the Russian Federation [Problemy i perspektivy razvitiia sistemy upravleniia kachestvom vysshego obrazovaniia v Rossiiskoi Federatsii]. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University [Vestnik Cheliabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta], 2 (384), 190-196. (In Russian). Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/problemy-i-perspektivy-razvitiya-sistemy-upravleniya-kachestvom-vysshego-obrazovaniya-v-rossiyskoy-federatsii
3. Gelman, V. Ya. (2019). On the problem of reliability and accuracy of students' evaluation of teaching lecturing [K voprosu o dostovernosti i tochnosti studencheskoi otsenki prepodavaniia]. Alma mater (Bulletin of the Higher School) [Alma mater (Vestnik vysshei shkoly)], 9, 55-58. (In Russian). DOI: 10.20339/AM.09-19.055
4. Drondin, A. L. (2020). Independent Assessment of the Quality of Russian Higher Educa­tion: What is the Point and What Can Be Improved [Nezavisimaia otsenka kachest-va rossiiskogo vysshego obrazovaniia: zachem ona nuzhna i chto mozhno ulu-chshit']. Higher education in Russia [Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii], 29 (2). 41-49. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-2-41-49
5. Dresel, M., Rindermann, H. (2011). Counseling University Instructors Based on Student Evaluations of Their Teaching Effectiveness: A Multilevel Test of its Effectiveness Under Consideration of Bias and Unfairness Variables. Research Higher Education, 52, 717-737. DOI: 10.1007/s11162-011-9214-7
6. Feistauer, D., & Richter, T. (2017). How reliable are students' evaluations of teaching quality? A variance components approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42 (8), 1263-1279. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2016.1261083
7. Feistauer, D., & Richter, T. (2018). The Role of Clarity About Study Programme Contents and Interest in Student Evaluations of Teaching. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 17 (3), 272-292. DOI: 10.1177/1475725718779727
8. Feistauer, D., & Richter, T. (2018). Validity of students' evaluations of teaching: Biasing effects of likability and prior subject interest. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 168-178. DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.009
9. Ignatiev, V. P., Varlamova, L. F., & Stepanov, P. A. (2016). Students' Involvement to Assessment of Education Quality. [Privlechenie studentov k otsenke kachestva ob-razovaniia]. Modern high-tech technologies [Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii], 12 (1), 141-145. (In Russian).
10. Khutorskoy, A. V. (2007). Correlation activity and educational content [Sootnoshenie deiatel'nosti i soderzhaniia obrazovaniia]. Journal of School Technology [Shkol'nye tekhnologii], 3, 10-27. (In Russian).
11. Leontiev, A. N. (1987). Activity. Consciousness. Personality [Deiatel'nost', soznanie, lichnost]. Moscow, Russia: Publishing house of political literature [Moskva, Rossiia: Izd-vo politicheskoi literatury]. (In Russian).
12. Liu, Gi-Zen, Liu, Zih-Hui, & Hwang, Gwo-Jen. (2011). Developing multi-dimensional evaluation criteria for English learning websites with university students and profes­sors. Computers & Education, 56, 65-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.019
13. Lowrie, A., & Gruber, T. (2012). Investigating the Influence of Professor Characteristics on Student Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction. A Comparative Study. Journal of Marke­ting Education, 8. DOI: 10.1177/0273475312450385
14. Marsh, H. W., Dicke, T., & Pfeiffer, M. (2019). A tale of two quests: The (almost) non-overlapping research literatures on students' evaluations of secondary-school and university teachers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58, 1-18. DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.01.011
15. Neyazi, N., Arab, M., Farzianpour, F., & Majdabadi, M. (2016). Evaluation of se­lected faculties at Tehran University of Medical Sciences using CIPP model in stu­dents and graduates point of view. Evaluation and Program Planning, 59, 88-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.013
16. Nikolaidis, Y., & Dimitriadis, S. G. (2014). On the student evaluation of university courses and faculty members' teaching performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 238, 199-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.03.018
17. Olave, K., & Hattie, J. (2021). From fixing the work to improving the learner: An ini­tial evaluation of a professional learning intervention using a new student-cent­red feedback model. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, Art. 100943 (SCFM). DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100943
18. Rubin, Yu. B., & Soboleva, E. Yu. (2021). Independence of Higher Education Quality Assurance: Criteria, Principles, Realities [Nezavisimost' otsenki kachestva vysshego obrazovaniia: kriterii, printsipy, realii]. Higher education in Russia [Vysshee obra-zovanie v Rossii], 30 (3), 26-42. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30­3-26-42
19. Saharov, N. (2012). Students' Participation in the External Evaluation Process for the Ro­manian Universities. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5173-5177. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.403
20. Spasennikov, V. V., Garbuzova, G. V., & Ermakova, E. A. (2021). Ergonomic sup­port for the development of a graphic color scale of student assessment of teaching activities [Ergonomicheskoe obespechenie razrabotki graficheskoi tsvetovoi shkaly studencheskoi otsenki prepodavatel'skoi deiatel'nosti]. Bulletin of JarSU. Series «Humanities» [Vestnik IarGU. Seriia «Gumanitarnye nauki»], 15 (1), 110-120. (In Russian). DOI: 10.18255/1996-5648-2021-1-110-119
21. Spooren, P., Brockx, B., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the Validity of Student Evalua­tion of Teaching: The State of the Art. Review of educational research published online 20 August 2013. DOI: 10.3102/0034654313496870
22. Sushchenko, A. D., & Sandler, D. G. (2017). How University Students are engaged in «Feedback»: System Research Practice In URFU [Kak studenty vovlecheny v mekhanizmy «obratnoi sviazi»]. University Management: Practice and Analysis [Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz], 21 (2), 176-191. (In Russian). DOI: 10.15826/umpa.2017.02.031
23. Temnov, E. S., Morzhov, A. V., & Rannikh, V. N. (2018). Student — Subject of Inter­nal, Independent Evaluation the Quality of Education in Russian Universities [Stu­dent — sub"ekt vnutrennei nezavisimoi otsenki kachestva obrazovaniia v rossiiskikh vuzakh]. Izvestiya Tula State University. Pedagogy [Izvestiia Tul'skogo gosudarstven-nogo universiteta. Pedagogika], 4, 120-129. (In Russian).
24. Vasiliev, A. I. (2019). Quality and Competitiveness in the System of Higher Education: Aspects of Interrelation. Higher Education in Russia, 28 (4), 37-43. (In Russian). DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-4-37-43
25. Villar, F., Pinazo, S., Triado, C., Celdran, M., & Sole, C. (2011). How students evaluate university programmes for older people: A comparison between two models in Spain. Journal of Aging Studies, 25, 18-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaging.2010.08.014
26. Wolbring, T., & Riordan, P. (2016). How beauty works. Theoretical mechanisms and two empirical applications on students' evaluation of teaching. Social Science Research, 57, 253-272. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.12.009
27. Zimnyaya, I. A. (2009). Klyuchevyye kompetentsii — novaya paradigma rezul'tata obrazovaniya [Key competencies — a new paradigm of the result of education]. Experi­ment and innovations in school, 2, 7-15. (In Russian).
28. Zotova, V. A. (2016). Student assessment of the quality of education: European experience. Fundamental research, 2 (3), 561-564. (In Russian).
Download file .pdf 436.84 kb