Authors
- Oshchepkov Aleksey Alexandrovich PhD in Psychology
- Salakhova Valentina B. PhD in Psychology
- Tkhugo Muliat M. PhD in Pedagogy
- Kidinov Alexey V. Doctor of Psychology, Associate Professor
Annotation
The relevance of the study is caused by the need to cultivate in the growing generation the leader’s abilities, important for modern society with its challenges to professional’s personality who is able to initiative and responsibility. Modern tendencies of society development are expressed in transit from traditional systems of knowledge transfer to modern complex approaches to development of personality of future specialists. To solve complicated problems of modern society critical and creative thinking together with ability of cooperative problem solving is required. Along with this, it is worth considering the fact that human activity, in particular educational and professional, is encapsulated with its values system, that increases the role of value-based approach in the frames of educational process of professional development. With the relation to it, the given article is directed to study the impact of pedagogical conditions onto values orientations system of young generation. The leading method of the problem is pedagogical experiment, which allowed to reveal the dynamics of youth’s values in the conditions of pedagogical processб augme nted
with the pedagogical program of motivational development. In the frameworks of the given program the life ways, the significant people involved in the life situations of were studied that allowed us to reveal the main values constructs orienting young people in the relations to self, to surroundings, to society and to the world generally. In the work it is revealed, that the youth’s orientation to achievements and social relations let them develop leader’s abilities.The presented in the article materials allow us enrich the pedagogical process, directed to develop initiative and responsible personality.
How to link insert
Oshchepkov, A. A., Salakhova, V. B., Tkhugo, M. M. & Kidinov, A. V. (2022). THE IMPACT OF PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGY OF MOTIVATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ONTO VALUE SELF-DETERMINATION OF STUDENTS WITH THE HIGH LEVEL OF LEADER’S POTENTIAL Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 16(3), 102. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2022.16.3.06
References
1.
1. Krivoruchko, M. V. (2009). Impact of attitudes to leading political patries and to their leaders onto the shapes of ideal and typical leaders. Bulletin of Omsk State University. Series of Psychology, 1, 36–47. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21545781
2.
2. Kamenskaia, V. G., & Kuskov, A. A. (2016). Constitutional and Intellectual factors of leader’s self-determination in youth group. Progress of modern science and education, 4 (10), 156–159. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27435037
3.
3. Mink, O., Rogers, R., & Watkins, K. (1989). Creative leadership: discovering paradoxes of innovation and risk. Contemporary educational psychology, 14 (3), 228–240.https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476x(89)90012-x
4.
4. Kriukova, N. A., Basov, O.N., & Maliarova, N.A. (2016). Methodological bases of young leaders training. Clasters. Researches and Developments, 2–3 (4), 19–26. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27700538
5.
5. Savva, L. I., & Gasanenko, E. A. (2015). Professional image of student. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2, 170–177. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23209863 (In Russ.).
6.
6. Purvis, A. J., Rodgers, H. M., & Beckingham, S. (2020). Experiences and perspectives of social media in learning and teaching in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100018
7.
7. Belov, V. V. (2016). Acmeological approach to study organization’s leader personality. Psychology of XXI century: Theory and Practice of Modern Psychology. Materials of XI International science-practical conference of young scientists (pp. 106–109). Leningrad State University in the name of A. S. Pushkin. St. Petersburg. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=28382690
8.
8. Henriksen, D. (2021). Creativity and risk-taking in teaching and learning settings: Insights from six international narratives. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 2 (2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100024
9.
9. Shapovalova, P. V., & Atrakhimovich, P. E. (2017). Philosophy of leadership in sociological section. Academic science — problems and achievements. Materials of XII International scientific-practical conference (pp. 85–87). Northern Charlston, USA. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29244301
10.
10. Baburova, N. B. (2020). Leader vs victim: formation of victim behavior in the leader through persecution. Bulletin of Mscow State Regional University, 3, 121–133. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44038423 (In Russ.).
11.
11. Bothner, M. S., Kim, Y. K., & Lee, W. (2015). Primary status, complementary status, and organizational survival in the US venture capital industry. Social Science Research, 52, 588–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.03.010
12.
12. Avdeenko, N. A., Denishcheva L. O., Krasnoyarskaya K. A., Mihajlova A. M., Pinskaya M. A., & Rydze O. A. (2021). Sciences of XXI century: How to Form and to Evaluate in the Lesson? Educational Policy. https://edpolicy.ru/form-and-evaluate (In Russ.).
13.
13. Care, E., Kim, H., Vista, A., & Anderson, K. (2018). Education System Alignment for 21st century skills. Focus On Assessment. Brookings institution. https://www.brookings.edu/research/education-system-alignment-for-21st-century-skills/
14.
14. Andreeva, A. D., Lisichkina, A. G., & Brimova, L. A. (2021). A time and life perspective as a motivational center of self-determination in early adolescence: a comparative historical study. Theoretical and Experimental Psychology Journal, 14 (1), 6–15.
15.
15. Shilova, N. P. (2021). Formation of the time perspective of modern boys and girls. Theoretical and Experimental Psychology Journal, 14 (1), 34–42.
16.
16. Mitina, L. M., Mitin, G. V., & Shchelina, S. O. (2021). Psychological features of personal and professional development of students during the transition from secondary education to higher education: crises and conditions for overcoming. Theoretical and Experimental Psychology Journal, 14 (3), 42–54. https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0861-2021-3-42-54
17.
17. Iadov, V. A. (2013). Self-regulation and predicting of personality’s social behavior: Dispositional Conception. Center for Social Forecasting and Marketing. Moscow. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37243350
18.
18. Asmolov, A. G. (2018). Mobie in Mobile In Asmolov, A. G. (Ed.). Mobilis in Mobile: Personality in Epoch of Changes (pp. 9–28). Moscow: YASK Press. (In Russ.).
19.
19. Oshchepkov, A. A., Salakhova, V. B., & Friauf, V. V. (2020). Review of Empirical Studies of Pedagogical Conditions of Leaders Preparing in Youth Environment. Personality Formation, 1 (2), 82–87. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44221623 (In Russ.).
20.
20. Schwartz, S. H. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and social psychology, 103, 663–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029393
21.
21. Harding, J. (1952). Sociometry, experimental method and the science of society: an approach to a new political orientation. Psychological Bulletin, 49 (3), 283–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0049709
22.
22. Ravenette, T. (2005). Constructive intervention when children are presented as problems. International handbook of personal construct theory, 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013370.ch28
23.
23. Bell, R. C. (2003). The repertory grid technique. In Fransella, F. (Ed.). International handbook of personal construct psychology (pp. 95–103). John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013370.ch9
24.
24. Vershinina, T. S., & Ilyushkina, M. Y. (2020). Social practices of advertising disclosure: influence of stylistic expressive means of forming value orientations. Russian Linguistic Bulletin, 3 (23), 94–101. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=43945085
25.
25. Glaveanu, V. P., & Tanggaard, L. (2014). Creativity, identity, and representation: Towards a socio-cultural theory of creative identity. New Ideas in Psychology, 34, 12–21. https://doi.org/10/1016/j.newideapsych.2014.02.002
26.
26. Oshchepkov, A. A., & Friauf, V. V. (2020a). The Study of values systems dinamics of youth leaders in the pedagogical conditions of value-motivational development. Bulletin of higher school, 10, 23–27. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44166588
27.
27. Oshchepkov, A. A., & Friauf, V. V. (2020b). Pedagogical Conditions of Values System Formation of Youth with High Level of Leader Potential. Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University. Series: Pedagogics, 2, 31–38. (In Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=42971112