Authors
- Fedorenkо Elena Yu. PhD in Psychology
- Dreytser Sofya I.
- Ostroverkh Angelina I.
Annotation
The relevance of this study is due to the need to develop students’ ability for self-determination in a situation of uncertainty. It is important for students to master both subject competencies, and the ability to discover their own lack of knowledge in an ever-changing situation of uncertainty, as well as independently plan their own learning. It is essential for students to acquire such tools of self-determination that will support them in coping with the world’s uncertainty and creating foundations for their own choice and decision-making. In this regard, the purpose of this article is to study the mechanisms of self-determination and the activity-based nature of self-determination. The methods of this study are based on the school of cultural-historical psychology and the methodology of the activity-based approach in psychology and pedagogy. The theoretical and methodological foundations for the development of the concept “self-determination” include the works of psychologists, methodologists and teachers involved in research and development of innovative psychological and pedagogical practices. The results of the study include a theoretical analysis of the concept and mechanisms of self-determination based on the works of Russian and international scientists, a description of creating self-determinative
conditions for undergraduate students enrolled in the program “Entrepreneurship in Education” at the Moscow School of Social and Economic Sciences. The article discusses the connection of self-determination with the university learning space and the development of students’ reflective attitudes in the process of learning. The article presents conclusions on the approaches to learning space organization and development of students’ reflective attitudes towards the learning space that contribute to self-determination. The practical value of the article is the possibility of application of the described mechanism of self-determination for further experimental research on the organization of students’ self-determination.
How to link insert
Fedorenkо, E. Y., Dreytser, S. I. & Ostroverkh, A. I. (2023). SELF-DETERMINATION AND REFLEXIVE ACTION OF STUDENTS IN THE LEARNING SPACE Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 17(4), 42. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2023.17.4.03
References
1.
1. Townsend, D., Hunt, R., Beal, D., & Jin, J. H. (2020). Venturing into the Unknown: A Meta-Analytic Assessment of Uncertainty in Entrepreneurship Research. Academy of Management Proceedings, 17318. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2020.17318abstract
2.
2. Nwabueze, A. I., & Isilebo, N. C. (2022). Moderm trends in education development. In: International and comparative education: Cross-culturalapproach (pp. 545–558). Port Harcourt: Celwil Publishers. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360108214_MODERN_TRENDS_IN_EDUCATIONAL_DEVELOPMENT
3.
3. de Beer, L., Vos, D., & Steyn, H. (2018). Education in Modern Society. BCES Conference Books, 16, 10–18. Sofia: Bulgarian Comparative Education Society. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342448251_Education_in_Modern_Society
4.
4. Mаgruk, А. (2020). Uncertainties, Knowledge, and Futures in Foresight Studies — A Case of the Industry 4.0. Foresight and STI Governance, 14(4), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2020.4.20.33
5.
5. Roberson, Jr., D. N., Zach, S., Choresh, N., & Rosenthal, I. (2021). Self Directed Learning: A Longstanding Tool for Uncertain Times. Creative Education, 12, 1011–1026. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.125074
6.
6. Laszlo, A., Luksha, P., & Karabeg, D. (2017). Systemic innovation, education and the social impact of the systems sciences. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 34(5), 601–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2492
7.
7. Sherouk, J. (2017). Skill of Forecasting Career Trends. In: Student-Driven Learning Strategies for the 21st Century Classroom. Publisher: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1689-7.ch022
8.
8. Sherouk, K., & Raad, K. (2020). What Educational Actions are Urgently Needed for Developing E-Learning and Enhancing the 21st Century Skills. 2020 Sixth International Conference on e-Learning (econf), Sakheer, Bahrain (pp. 51–54). https://doi.org/10.1109/econf51404.2020.9385518
9.
9. Bashun, O. V., & Proshina, I. I. (2015). Main problems in the transition to the Federal State Educational Standard of Basic General Education. Vestnik KRAUNC. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2(26), 64–68. (In Russ.).
10.
10. Kipurova, S. N., & Malij, D. V. (2014). The essence of professional self-determination of a university student. Izvestiya TulGU. Gumanitarnye nauki, 4(2). (In Russ.).
11.
11. Shchedrovickij, P. G. (2022). Draft sketches for the basic scheme of self-determination. The website of the philosopher and methodologist Peter Shchedrovitsky. (In Russ.). https://shchedrovitskiy.com/nabroski-k-bazovoy-sheme-samoopredeleniya-1/
12.
12. Petrovskij, V. A. (2010). The person is above the situation. Moscow: Smysl. (In Russ.).
13.
13. Khasan, B. I. (2018). Constructive psychology of conflict. Moscow: Yurajt. (In Russ.).
14.
14. Khasan, B. I. (2020, the 3d of April). Content conflict as a condition for the formation of educational interest and professional self-determination. In: Kim, D. V. (Ed.). Actual problems of combating crime: issues of theory and practice. Proceedings of the XXIII International scientific-practical conference, Krasnoyarsk, 02–03 April 2020. In two parts, p. 2, 11–13. Krasnoyarsk: Siberian Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation. (In Russ.).
15.
15. Frumin, I. D., & El’konin, B. D. (1993). Educational space as a development space. Voprosy psihologii, 1, 24–32. (In Russ.).
16.
16. Frumin, I. D. (1987). Self-determination and choice in the intensive pedagogical process. Problemy samoopredeleniya molodezhi, 52–54. (In Russ.).
17.
17. Luchenkov, A. V. (2016). A model of a high school focused on the age characteristics of students: the results of implementation. Voprosy obrazovaniya, 1, 191–204. (In Russ.).
18.
18. Duka, N. A., & Duka, T. O. (2012). Student’s educational choice as an interdisciplinary phenomenon. Psihopedagogika v pravoohranitel’nyh organah, 2 (49). (In Russ.).
19.
19. Brooks, C., & Young, S. (2011). Are Choice-Making Opportunities Needed in the Classroom? Using Self-Determination Theory to Consider Student Motivation and Learner Empowerment. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), 48–59. http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/
20.
20. Popov, A. A., Averkov, M. S., & Matyunina, M. A. (2022). Self-determination: model and method of organization. Vestnik of TSU Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Politologiya, 65, 154–170. (In Russ.).
21.
21. Alekseev, N. G. (2002). Designing the conditions for the development of reflective thinking. Doctor Thesis of Psychological Sciences. Moscow: MPGU. 51 p. (In Russ.).
22.
22. Osipov, P. N. (2011). Professional self-determination of students as a social and pedagogical problem. Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta, 5, 237–242. (In Russ.).
23.
23. Wardani, A., Gunawan, I., Kusumaningrum, D., Benty, D., Sumarsono, R., Nurabadi, A., & Handayani, L. (2020). Student Learning Motivation: A Conceptual Paper. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Early Childhood and Primary Childhood Education (ECPE 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201112.049
24.
24. Seifert, T. (2004). Understanding student motivation. Educational Research, 46, 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188042000222421
25.
25. Godor, B. P., van der Horst, F., & Hallen, R. (2023). Unravelling the Roots of Emotional Development: Examining the Relationships Between Attachment, Resilience and Coping in Young Adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316231181876
26.
26. Gallagher, T., & Bennett, S. (2018). The six ‘P’ model: principles of coaching for inclusion coaches. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-03-2017-0018
27.
27. Yirci, R., Karakose, T., & Kocabaş, I. (2016). Coaching as a Performance Improvement Tool at School. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(13). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305692064_Coaching_as_a_Performance_Improvement_Tool_at_School_1
28.
28. Kukushin, M. (2016). Coaching and tutoring. Vesti obrazovaniya, 2(131). (In Russ.). http://www.thetutor.ru/blogi-chlenov-mta.html
29.
29. Kovaleva, T. M. (2016). Coaching and tutoring as successive mutual resource anthropopractices. Vesti obrazovaniya, 2(131). (In Russ.). http://edition.vogazeta.ru/ivo/info/14733.html
30.
30. Goryunova, L. V., & Dorohmanova, M. A. (2015). Tutor support of professional self-determination of students in the conditions of integration of basic and additional education. Koncept, 12. (In Russ.).
31.
31. Yudina, Yu. G., & Drejcer, S. I. (2018). Reflective reversal of the student’s project action as a necessary condition for the formation of his individual educational initiative. Praktiki razvitiya: individual’naya iniciativa v novom obrazovatel’nom prostranstve, 83–90. (In Russ.).
32.
32. Moser, K. S. (2000). Metaphor Analysis in Psychology — Method, Theory, and Fields of Application [22 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), 21. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0002212
33.
33. Dooremalen, A., & Borsboom, D. (2011). Metaphors in psychological conceptualization and explanation. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research — J INTELLECT DISABIL RES. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254782705_Metaphors_in_psychological_conceptualization_and_explanation
34.
34. Khasan, B. I. (2018). Why is the Game? Chelovek.RU, 13, 116–127. (In Russ.).
35.
35. Lipskaya, T. A. (2009). Possibilities of metaphor as a psychological method. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo centra RAN, 4(3), 691–695. (In Russ.).
36.
36. Chemsi, G., Mounir, S., Radid, M., & Talbi, M. (2020). Study of the Self-Determined Motivation among Students in the Context of Online Pedagogical Activities. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15, 17. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i05.11392
37.
37. Imamudin, N., & Budiman, S. (2020). Development of Self-Determination. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Psychology and Pedagogy — Diversity in Education” (ICEPP 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200130.094
38.
38. Kinsella, M., Moloney, D., Nestor, N., Wyatt, J., Last, J., & Rackard, S. (2023). Fostering Student Engagement in a Digitally Mediated Environment: Attitudes and Experiences of Student Advisers. Student Engagement in Higher Education Journal, 4(3), 91–121. https://sehej.raise-network.com/raise/article/view/1163
39.
39. Reeve, J. (2012). A Self-determination Theory Perspective on Student Engagement. In: Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp 149–172). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7