Home Releases 17(4)

MOTIVATIONAL GROUNDS AND EDUCATIONAL EFFECTS OF FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS’ CHOICE OF PRE-PROFILE MODULES WITHIN THE EDUCATIONAL MODEL “2 + 2 + 2”

Problems of Professional Training , UDC: 159.9 DOI: 10.25688/2076-9121.2023.17.4.08

Authors

  • Postavneva Irina Vasilievna Ph.D. in Psychology, associate professor
  • Postavnev Vladimir Mikhailovich Ph.D. in Psychology, associate professor
  • Klyuchko Olga Ivanovna Doctor of Philosophy, associate professor
  • Listik Elena M. PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor
  • Kosyak Victoria V.
  • Frolovа Evgeniya V. PhD in Psychology

Annotation

The relevance of the study of educational and psychological effects within the training programs based on the “2 + 2 + 2” model is due to its high potential for improving the psychological literacy of first-year students as a requirement for their successful adaptation within the university educational system. The article considers the possibilities to develop the psychological competencies of student teachers by introducing this model into university practice. The model enables the internal academic mobility of undergraduate students, starting from their first year, and makes their learning more differentiated and customized. The aim of the study was to analyze the educational and psychological effects of the “2 + 2 + 2” model within the learning process by conducting a survey of first-year undergraduate students. The respondents included 139 first-year students who enrolled in 2022 in the field of study 44.00.00 “Education and Pedagogical Sciences”. The questionnaire used in the survey was “Motivational reasons for choosing pre-profile modules by 1st year students”. The results of the survey of the first-year students enrolled in the programmes based on the “2 + 2 + 2” model, showed that students choose pre-profile modules not only to obtain professional knowledge, but to understand themselves and others, to regulate their physical and emotional state. The study showed that along with the striving to obtain the preferred profile of training, students choose variable pre-profile modules because of their need to solve the most pressing problems connected with becoming students, including development of new social roles, adaptation to university, development of professional competencies.

How to link insert

Postavneva, I. V., Postavnev, V. M., Klyuchko, O. I., Listik, E. M., Kosyak, V. V. & Frolovа, E. V. (2023). MOTIVATIONAL GROUNDS AND EDUCATIONAL EFFECTS OF FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS’ CHOICE OF PRE-PROFILE MODULES WITHIN THE EDUCATIONAL MODEL “2 + 2 + 2” Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 17(4), 133. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2023.17.4.08
References
1. 1. Basiuk, V. S. (2022). Modern tendencies of teacher training in the conditions of rapidly changing social challenges. Vestnik of Moscow University. Series 20: Pedagogical education, 3, 38–55. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.51314/2073-2635-2022-3-38-55
2. 2. Margolis, A. A. (2019). Teacher qualification assessment: a review and analysis of best foreign practices. Psychological Science and Education, 24(1), 5–30. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2019240101
3. 3. Gevorkian, E. N., Savenkov, A. I., & Agranat, D. L. (2021). Academic mobility of undergraduate and graduate students in the conditions of implementation of academic and applied educational programmes. In: Gevorkyan, E. N., Podufalov, N. D., & Strikhanov, M. N. (The authors and compilers). Innovative processes in higher and vocational education and professional training. Collective monograph (pp. 193–201). Мoscow. (In Russ.).
4. 4. Kavenuke, P. S., Kinyota, M. K., & Joel, J. (20 20). The critical thinking skills of prospective teachers: Investigating their systematicity, self-confidence and scepticism. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100677
5. 5. Abdelrahman, R. M. (2020). Metacognitive awareness and academic motivation and their impact on academic achievement of Ajman University students. Heliyon, 6(9), e04192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04192
6. 6. Safina, A. M., Garifullina, R. U., Ganieva, A. M., & Matushenko, O. A. (2020). Emotional intelligence in teacher’s activities. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 9(2), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad. v9i2.2677
7. 7. Basiuk, V. S., Malykh, S. B., & Tikhomirova, T. N. (2022). Federal network of psychological services of educational organisations of higher education: concept, priorities and development resources. Psychological science and education, 27(6), 4–18. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2022270601
8. 8. Antonova, N. A., Yeritsyan, K. Y., & Tsvetkova, L. A. (2021). Request for psychological help of students of pedagogical university. Human Psychology in Education, 3(2), 208–217. (In Russ.). https://www.doi.org/10.33910/2686-9527-2021-3-2-208-217
9. 9. Bakker, А. В., & Vries, J. (2021). Job Demands-Resources theory and self-regulation: New explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety Stress Coping, 34, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/106158 06.2020.1797695
10. 10. Naumova, D. V. (Ed.), Yasvin, V. A., Martianova, G. Yu., Tsaplina, O. V., Klyuchko, O. N., Pavlenko, T. A., ... & Egorova, T. N. (2021). Psychoprophylaxis and psychological education in the educational environment. A textbook for universities (pp. 113–140). Moscow: Yurait. (In Russ.). https://urait.ru/bcode/481970
11. 11. Antonova, N. A. (2020) Students’ attitudes to receiving help in the sphere of mental health. Izvestiya Russian State Pedagogical University named after A. I. Herzen, 195, 213–222. (In Russ.). https://www.doi.org/10.33910/1992-6464-2020-195-213-222
12. 12. Anisimova, T. V., & Tsvetkova, L. A. (2021). Psychological, social and environmental resources of health of students at different levels of education in modern Russia. Bulletin of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, 4(112), 44–49. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22204/2410-4639-2021-112-04-44-49
13. 13. Dubrovina, I. V. (2022). Psychological health of personality as a phenomenon. Humanisation of education, 4, 35–43. (In Russ.). EDN ZXRTXM. https://doi. org/10.24412/1029-3388-2022-4-35-43
14. 14. Frolova, E. V. (2022). The structure of creative abilities in students with different levels of academic performance. Izvestia Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology of Education. (In Russ.). http://izvestia-ippo.ru/frolova-e-v-struktura-tvorcheskikh-spo/
15. 15. Kosyak, V. V. (2019). Determinants of perception of modality perception of educational environment by students of pedagogical university. Izvestia Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 3, 57–61. (In Russ.). http://izvestia-ippo.ru/kosyak-v-v-determinanty-vospriyatiya-mod/
16. 16. Postavnev, V. M, Alisov, E. A., Postavneva, I. V., Podymova, L. S., & Ginting, H. (2020). Differential Acmeological Approach to The Design of Psychological Support for Professional and Personal Development of Pedagogical University Students. In: SHS Web of Conferences. International Scientific and Practical Conference “Theory and Practice of Project Management in Education: Horizons and Risks”, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20207902021
17. 17. Aigunova, O. A., Gevorkyan, E. N., & Osipenko, L. E. (2017). Metropolitan education and employers: in search of effective models of partnership (on the material of joint monitoring of the quality of students’ training. MCU Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology, 3(41), 37–46. (In Russ.).
18. 18. Gevorkyan, E. N., & Savenkov, A. I. (2019). Diversification of the content of trainingof future teachers. Pedagogika, 4, 70–73. (In Russ.).
19. 19. Klyuchko, O. I., Golubushina, K. K., Vinogradova, I. A., & Samosadova, E. V. (2015). Goals of professional development of pedagogical university students and pedagogical practitioners. Higher Education in Russia, 5, 103–110. (In Russ.).
20. 20. Ilyevich, T. P., & Fedoruk, K. R. (2021). Competence approach to the system of professional training in the conditions of higher education institution: from methodology to modelling. Bulletin of Transnistrian University. Series: Humanities, 1(67), 77–83. (In Russ.).
21. 21. Eroshenkova, E. I., Shapovalova, I. S., Karabutova, E. A., Anokhina, S. V., & Miroshnikova, O. S. (2022). Prosocial competence model of the future teacher. Education and Science, 24(2), 11–47. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-2-11-47
22. 22. Johnson, M. (2021). Where Are Our Values Bred? Sources of Moral Norms. Morality for Humans, 2, 48–72. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226113548-004
23. 23. Mukhin, M. I. (2021). A teacher of the future school. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovania — Perspectives of Science and Education, 49(1). 10–23. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2021.1.1.1
Download file .pdf 424.19 kb