Authors
- Yakubova Dilyara Dzhavdetovna PhD in Philology, Associate Professor
Annotation
This article examines a rare phenomenon of a school created by a community of people with common values and interests. The purpose of the work was to reveal its features by presenting the results of a study of one such case using the case study method. The study presents the approaches to defining the concept of community as an object of study. The study provides the examples of school models that have a close connection with a certain community, including family and community schools. The “Selet” community, uniting talented children, youth and their mentors in the Republic of Tatarstan and beyond, is characterized through the prism of community-forming characteristics. The results of the study of a school created by the “Selet” community in Kazan are described using the case study method based on the interviews with community representatives, data analysis and observation. The study reveals the prerequisites and reasons for creating a school by the “Selet” community. It also describes the stages that the “Selet” community went through when creating the school, as well as the features of its organization and management. The conclusions are the following: the emergence of a school is seen by the community participants as a result of its natural development, accumulation of potential and experience, and building relationships with government agencies. A special feature of such a school is that it is organized according to a community-driven model and is managed
with its direct participation.
How to link insert
Yakubova, D. D. (2024). COMMUNITY-BASED SCHOOL: FROM IDEA TO IMPLEMENTATION (BASED ON THE CASE OF THE “SELET” COMMUNITY SCHOOL) Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 18 (1-1), 119. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2024.18.1-1.06
References
1.
1. Borders, M. (2018). The Social Singularity: How Decentralisation will Allow us to Transcend Politics, Create Global Prosperity, and Avoid the Robot Apocalypse. NY: Social Evolution, 210 p.
2.
2. Yankevich, S. V., & Puchkov, E. V. (2021). Family education in Russia and foreign countries: approaches to legal regulation. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 17(2), 104–117. (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/semeynoe-obrazovanie-v-rossii-i-zarubezhnyh-stranah-podhody-k-pravovomu-regulirovaniyu
3.
3. Dryfoos, J., & Maguire, S. (2019). Inside full-service community schools. Skyhorse, 256 p. https://books.google.ru/books?hl=ru&lr=&id=uTFGDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT26&dq=community+school&ots=03uPbPHzxr&sig=P6hjOszU00UEPimC8PT9OlUlocE&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=community%20school&f=false
4.
4. Kornetov, G. B. (2012). Socially active schools. School technologies, (6), 89–98. (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obschestvenno-aktivnye-shkoly
5.
5. Tennis, F. (1998). Community and Society. Sociological Journal, (3), 206–209. (In Russ.). https://cfs.hse.ru/data/2016/05/15/1129029942/Теннис%20-%20Общность%20и%20общество%20(2002).pdf
6.
6. Durkheim, E. (1990). On the division of social labor. Method of sociology. Moscow: Science. 575 pp. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Weber, M. (1990). Selected works. Moscow: Progress. 808 p. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Hillery, J. H. (1955). Definitions of Community: Areas of Agreement. Rural Sociology, 20, 111–119.
9.
9. Demchuk, N. V. (2019). Local community: interpretation of the concept. Bulletin of Maikop State Technological University, 2(41), 111–121. (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/mestnoe-soobschestvo-interpretatsiya-ponyatiya/viewer
10.
10. Theodori, G. L. (2005). Community and Community Development in Resource-Based Areas: Operational Definitions Rooted in an Interactional Perspective.
Society and Natural Resources, 18, 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/089419205909-59640
11.
11. Dementyev, S. M. (Сomp.). (2015). Social communities and their typology. The guidelines for studying the topic. Volgograd, VolgGASU. (In Russ.). https://vgasu.ru/attachments/oi_dementiev-01_000.pdf
12.
12. Anderson, B. (2016). Imagined communities. Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism. Moscow: Kuchkovo pole. 416 p. (In Russ.). https://publications.hse.ru/pubs/share/folder/xj2zhag7ov/195147667.pdf
13.
13. Zborovsky, G. E. (2016). Community approach as a methodology for sociological research. Bulletin of Nizhny Novgorod University named after. N. I. Lobachevsky. Series: Social Sciences, 1(41), 71–79. (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obschnostnyy-podhod-kak-metodologiya-sotsiologicheskogo-issledovaniya/viewer
14.
14. Ilyin, V. I. (2006). The dramaturgy of qualitative field research. St. Petersburg: Intersots. 256 p. (In Russ.). http://social-orthodox.info/materials/5_3_ilin_dram%20_kach_pol_issl.pdf
15.
15. Epstein, J. (1987). Teacher practices of parent involvement: What research says to teachers and administrators. Education in Urban Society, 19, 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124587019002002
16.
16. Goshin, M. E., Grigoriev, D. S., & Mertsalova, T. A. (2019). Types of parental involvement in education and schoolchildren’s academic performance. Questions of psychology, (2), 29–45. (In Russ.). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333984645_Tipy_roditelskoj_vovlecennosti_v_obrazovanie_i_uspevaemost_skolnikov
17.
17. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221931884_Five_Misunderstandings_About_Case-Study_Research
18.
18. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308385754_Robert_K_Yin_2014_Case_Study_Research_Design_and_Methods_5th_ed_Thousand_Oaks_CA_Sage_282_pages
19.
19. Alminderov, V. V., Giza, T., Zavalko, N. A., Iovchuk, N. M., Kravtsov, A. V., Lebedev, A. N., ..., & Shakirova, D. M. (2017). Intellectual and Creative Giftedness. Interdisciplinary approach. Monograph. Moscow: Scientific consultant. 220 p. (chapter: Intellectual potential through the prism of intelligence, creativity and morality. 40 p.). (In Russ.). https://e.lanbook.com/book/106193
20.
20. Kuchko, E. E. (2023). Methodological basis for the use of triangulation in sociological research. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology, (1), 46–52. (In Russ.). https://elib.bsu.by/handle/123456789/296870
21.
21. Kozina, I. (1997). Case study: some methodological problems. Frontier, (10–11), 177–189. (In Russ.). https://socioline.ru/files/6/183/kozina_-_case_study_-_nekotorye_metodicheskie_problemy.pdf
22.
22. Ballantine, J. H., Spade, J. Z., & Stuber, J. M. (2018). Schools and Society: A Sociological Approach to Education. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071873212
23.
23. Kasprzhak, A. G., Bayburin, R. F., Isaev, D. A., Kopylova, A. O., Lebedev, M. V., Logutova, N. L., ..., & Filippov A. V. (2021). New high school abroad: solutions (ed. by A. G. Kasprzhak, R. F. Bayburin, & N. L. Logutova; National research University “Higher School of Economics”). Moscow: Agey Tomesh Design. 140 p. (In Russ.). https://drive.google.com/file/d/19bRdzFAxsYCpRvOtnNjPm5AHOzSubwPd/view
24.
24. Nazukina, M. V. (2022). Methods for studying territorial communities. A textbook. Perm: Perm State National Research University. 101 p. (In Russ.). http://www.psu.ru/files/docs/science/books/uchebnie-posobiya/Nazukina-Metody-issledovaniya-territorialnyh-soobshchestv.pdf
25.
25. Pechenkin, V. V., & Zayonts V. V. (2011). Network methods for studying virtual communities. Theory and practice of social development, (5). (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/setevye-metody-issledovaniya-virtualnyh-soobschestv-1
26.
26. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf
27.
27. Suleymanov, D. Sh. (2013). Social educational community of gifted children and youth “Selet”. (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialno-obrazovatelnoe-soobschestvo-odarennyh-detey-i-molodezhi-s-l-t