Home Releases 18 (1-2)

TOLERANCE TO UNCERTAINTY AS A FACTOR OF DEVELOPING PSYCHOLOGICAL READINESS FOR PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES DURING TRAINING AT A UNIVERSITY

Psychology , UDC: 37.015.3 DOI: 10.25688/2076-9121.2024.18.1-2.14

Authors

  • Sokolskaya Marina V. Doctor of Psychology, Associate Professor
  • Bogomolova Oksana Yu.

Annotation

Increasingly, in the unstable global labor market, due to global transformational processes, events are occurring that in one way or another have an impact on all spheres of life. In today’s realities, the problem of developing psychological readiness for professional activity is one of the urgent ones, since there is an acute shortage of specialists who are ready to effectively perform the functions assigned to them, solve professional problems, clearly formulate professional goals and achieve them proactively, be independent and conscious. To be competitive in the labor market, it is not enough to have knowledge in a certain profession. One should have competence in the profession, which includes psychological readiness to work. Specialists with such competence largely contribute to the state’s ability to effectively grow and develop in the scientific, technical, economic, cultural and other spheres of public life. On the one hand, psychology has accumulated a number of facts that clearly indicate the influence of conscious self-regulation on the students’ psychological readiness for professional activities, and on the other hand, these issues have not been studied enough on the samples of students during different periods of training at a university. This substantiates the topicality of this study since it is aimed at identifying predictive connections between the regulatory characteristics of students and the level of their psychological readiness for professional activity, especially during transitional periods of training. It should be noted that psychological readiness for professional activity is developed during the period of training at a university. Psychological readiness for professional activity is a key factor in the effectiveness of the process of a person’s professional development; in conditions of uncertainty, the role of this factor becomes system-forming. Uncertainty in the professional sphere is viewed as a variety of possible scenarios that can develop in conditions of continuous change. This requires students to be willing to take brave and creative steps to solve professional problems in real life. Psychological readiness for professional activity also includes the ability to effectively manage emotions and stress. Thus, the ability to act effectively under conditions of uncertainty, adapt to unforeseen changes and work with limited information is an important characteristic of a professional. The purpose of this study is to identify the relationship between psychological readiness for future professional activity of university students and their attitude to the situation of uncertainty. The study included 121 full-time students of 1–3 years majoring in Economic Security at the Sakhalin Institute of Railway Transport, a branch of the Far Eastern State University of Railways in Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk. The range of psychodiagnostic tools included: R. V. Ovcharova’s methodology “Motives for choosing a profession”, V. I. Morosanova’s questionnaire “Style of self-regulation of behavior”, S. Badner’s questionnaire in G. U. Soldatova’s adaptation “Definition of tolerance to uncertainty” and T. V. Kornilova’s new questionnaire “Tolerance-intolerance to uncertainty”. The data obtained during the correlation analysis indicate the presence of a significant direct relationship between the studied parameters, namely: the higher the level of tolerance to the situation of uncertainty, the higher the level of students’ psychological readiness to professional activities. According to the results of the study, tolerance to uncertainty can be considered as one of the factors of the development of students’ psychological readiness to work, which is a prerequisite for successful solution of tasks connected with professional development of students.

How to link insert

Sokolskaya, M. V. & Bogomolova, O. Y. (2024). TOLERANCE TO UNCERTAINTY AS A FACTOR OF DEVELOPING PSYCHOLOGICAL READINESS FOR PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES DURING TRAINING AT A UNIVERSITY Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 18 (1-2), 110. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2024.18.1-2.14
References
1. 1. Sokolskaya, M. V., Musatova, O. A. (2021). Professional self-consciousness of a student as a condition for the formation of a professional personality. Human factor: Social psychologist, 1(41), 550–558. (In Russ).
2. 2. Dushkov, B. A., Korolev, A. V., & Smirnov, B. A. (2005). Psychological readiness. Psychology of labor, management, engineering psychology and ergonomics. Encyclopedic dictionary. (In Russ).
3. 3. Nersesyan, L. S., & Pushkin, V. N. (1969). Psychological structure of operator’s readiness for emergency action. Questions of psychology: the fifteenth year of publication, (5), 60–69 (In Russ).
4. 4. Platonov, K. K. (1986). Structure and development of personality. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ).
5. 5. Dyachenko, M. I., & Kandybovich, L. A. (1978). Psychological problems of readiness for activity. Monograph. Minsk.: BSU. 182 p. (In Russ).
6. 6. Derkach, A. A. (2004). Acmeological foundations of professional development. Moscow; Voronezh. (In Russ).
7. 7. Shadrikov, V. D. (1982). Problems of systemogenesis of professional activity. Moscow. (In Russ).
8. 8. Klimov, E. A. (1996). Psychology of professional self-determination. Textbook for universities. Rostov n./D. (In Russ).
9. 9. Allport, G. W. (1997). Personality and social encounter. Selected essays. Boston: Beacon Press. New York. 386 p.
10. 10. Maslou, A. (1967). Self-actualizing and Beyond. In: Challenges of Humanistic Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill. 300 p.
11. 11. Pryazhnikov, N. S. (2008). Motivation of labor activity. Studies manual for students higher studies. Moscow: Academy. (In Russ).
12. 12. Sanzhaeva, R. D. (2012). Psychological readiness of a person for activity as a metacategory. Bulletin of BSU. Education. Personality. Society, (1), 127–141. (In Russ).
13. 13. Asmolov, A. G. (2016). Continuing education: risks and values of Russia in conditions of uncertainty. Education in Russia and abroad, (11), 19–21. (In Russ).
14. 14. Kovaleva, T. M. (2020). The connection of competence and literacy in the work of a teacher of a modern school focused on further continuous human education (on the example of communicative competence and Futures-literacy”). In: Continuing education in the context of the idea of the Future: new literacy. Collection of scientific articles based on the materials of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference, Moscow, June 18–19, 2020 (pp. 88–92). Moscow: A PRIOR. (In Russ).
15. 15. Isaev, D. P., Klimenko, L. V., & Nor-Arevyan, O. A. (2017). Professional identity in Russian society (questions of history, theory, practice). Rostov n./D. 178 p. (In Russ).
16. 16. Makarov, V. A., Makarova, T. N., & Pereslavtseva, E. V. (2019). Comparative analysis of approaches to the assessment of professional competence of teachers. Eurasian Scientific Association, (10–6(56)), 488–491 (In Russ).
17. 17. Fomina, T. G., & Tsyganov, I. Yu. (2021). The study of the relationship between school engagement and conscious self-regulation in students: Age trajectories and gender aspect. In: Morosanova, Yu. P., & Zinchenko, Yu. P. Psychology of Self-Regulation in the Context of Current Problems of Education (to the 90th Anniversary of O. A. Konopkin). Conference Proceedings (pp. 120–129). Moscow: Psychological Institute of RAE. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/cl-36466-2021-1-120-129
18. 18. Drake, K., Belsky, J., & Fearon, R. M. P. (2014). From early attachment to engagement with learning in school: The role of self-regulation and persistence. Developmental Psychology, 50(5), 1350–1361. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032779
19. 19. Estévez, I., Rodríguez-Llorente, C., Piñeiro, I., González-Suárez, R., & Valle, A. (2021). School engagement, academic achievement, and self-regulated learning. Sustainability, 13(6), art. 3011. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063011
20. 20. Wang, M., Deng, X., & Du, X. (2018). Harsh parenting and academic achievement in Chinese adolescents: Potential mediating roles of effortful control and classroom engagement. Journal of School Psychology, 67, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.09.002
21. 21. Morosanova, V. I. (2017). Conscious self-regulation as a metasystem of psychological resources for achieving goals and self-development of a person. In: Zhuravlev, A. L., & Koltsova, V. A. (Responsible Ed.). Fundamental and applied research of modern psychology: results and prospects of development. Collection of articles (pp. 501–509). Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS. (In Russ). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30669910
22. 22. Park, S., & Kim, N. H. (2022). University students’ self-regulation, engagement and performance in flipped learning. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(1/2), 22–40. https://doi. org/10.1108/EJTD-08-2020-0129
23. 23. Rademacher, А. (2020). The longitudinal influence of self-regulation on school performance and behavior problems from preschool to elementary school. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 36(1), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2020.1847219
24. 24. Morosanova, V. I. (2016). Conscious selfregulation as a psychological resource to achieve educational and professional goals. Pedagogika, (10), 13–24. (In Russ).
25. 25. Bogomolova, O. Yu., & Sokolskaya, M. V. (2021). The problem of readiness for activity in psychological science. Personality education, (1–2), 24–29 (In Russ).
26. 26. Salmela‐Aro, K., Tang, X., Symonds, J., & Upadyaya, K. (2021). Student engagement in adolescence: A scoping review of longitudinal studies 2010–2020. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(2), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12619
Download file .pdf 445.52 kb