Authors
- Belolutskaya Anastasia K. PhD in Psychology
- Scherbakova Tatiana V. PhD in History
Annotation
The current stage of society development is characterized by the predominance of the innovation sector of economy, where the most part of activities is implemented
with the help of robots and information technologies. The main development factor here is investment in human capital, which generates high competition among specialists who are engaged in personality education and development. This requires new competencies from teachers connected with the development of students’ thinking and creativity. The studies related to the connection between teachers’ creative thinking and their professional competencies of working with students’ creative thinking are highly topical and of practical significance but are not sufficiently represented in scientific literature. The methodological basis of this study is the structural-dialectical approach, where the process of intellectual creativity is operationalized through the actions of dialectical thinking. The “If you think about it...” methodology was used to diagnose the dialectical thinking of teachers. An author’s case study methodology was developed to diagnose the professional competencies of teachers. The results of the study include presenting data on the effectiveness of teachers in completing the case tasks aimed at identifying the competencies related to the evelopment of creativity and dialectical thinking of students. A statistically significant correlation has been identified between the level of dialectical thinking of teachers and their professional competencies.
How to link insert
Belolutskaya, A. K. & Scherbakova, T. V. (2024). THE INTERRELATION OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCIES TO DEVELOP STUDENTS’ CREATIVITY AND SCHOOL TEACHERS’ DIALECTICAL THINKING Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 18 (3), 105. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2024.18.3.07
References
1.
1. Sternberg R., J., & Grigorenko, E. (1997). Guilford’s model of the structure of intelligence: a structure without a foundation. In: D. B. Bogoyavlenskaya (Ed.) Basic modern concepts of creativity and giftedness (pp. 111–127). Molodaya Gvardiya.
2.
2. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677
3.
3. Arlin, P. (2011). Dialectical thinking: Further implication for Creative thinking. In: Encyclopedia of Creativity, vol. 1 (eds. by A. M. Runko, S. L. Pritzer; pp. 383–386). Academic Press.
4.
4. Basseches, M. (2005). The Development of Dialectical Thinking as an Approach to Integration. Integral Review, 1, 47–63.
5.
5. Belolutskaya, A. K. (2017а). Approaches to the study of dialectical thinking. Psychological
journal, 38(2), 44–54. (In Russ.).
6.
6. Cheng, C. (2009). Dialectical thinking and coping flexibility: a multimethod approach. Journal of Personality, 471–491.
7.
7. Kaya, A. N., & Cikis, S. (2017). Links between creative perfomance and post-formal thought. Creativity. Theories, Research, Applications, 4(1), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-0006
8.
8. Krasheninnikov, E. E., Belolutskaya, A. K., & Vorob’eva, E. V. (2013). Diagnostika dialekticheskogo myshleniya. Moscow: MGPU. 140 p. EDN ULBPRP.
9.
9. Paletz, S. B. F., Bogue, K., Miron-Spektor, E., & Spencer-Rodgers, J. (2018). Dialectical thinking and creativity from many perspectives: Contradiction and tension. In: J. Spencer-Rodgers, & K. Peng (Eds.). The psychological and cultural foundations of East Asian cognition: Contradiction, change, and holism (pp. 267–308). Oxford University Press.
10.
10. Riegel, K. F. (1973). Dialectic operations: The final period of cognitive development. Human Development, 16(5), 346–370. https://doi-org.proxy3.noblenet.org/10.1159/000271287
11.
11. Yang Ch.-Ch., & Yang Ch.-Sh. (2010). Dialectical thinking and creativity among young adults: A postformal operations perspective. Psychological Reports, 106, 79–92.
12.
12. Liu, H., Wang, F., & Yang, X. (2015) More Dialectical Thinking, Less Creativity? The Relationship between Dialectical Thinking Style and Creative Personality: The Case of China. PLoS ONE, 10, 4, e0122926. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122926
13.
13. Belolutskaya, A. K. (2015). Multidimensionality of thinking in the context of creativity studies. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 8(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2015.0105. EDN UFZCLB.
14.
14. Belolutskaya, A. K. (2017b). Diagnostics of the ability of high school students and students to transform problematic and contradictory situations: The method “Heroes in the city”. Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology, 3(41), 54–71. (In Russ.).
15.
15. Belolutskaya, A. K. (2023). Intellectual Mechanisms of Solving of Problematic Situations with a High Degree of Uncertainty. In: N. Rezaei (Ed.). Brain, Decision Making and Mental Health. Integrated Science, vol. 12. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15959-6_30
16.
16. Shiyan, O. A., Belolutskaya, A. K., Le-Van, T. N., & Zadadaev S. Z. (2021). Cognitive development of preschoolers: the relationship of normative, transformative
and symbolic abilities. Modern preschool education, 6(108), 14–25. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/1997-9657-2021-6108-14-25. EDN YTAAPS.
17.
17. Veraksa, N. E. (2010). Structural Approach to Dialectic Cognition. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 3, 227–239 .
18.
18. Veraksa, N. E., Belolutskaya, A. K., Vorobyeva, I. I. et al. (2013). Structural Dialectical Approach in Psychology: Problems and Research Results. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 6(2), 65–77.