Home Releases 18 (3)

THE PROBLEM OF ENSURING INTEGRATED SAFETY OF SCHOOLS’ LEARNING SPACES IN THE VIEW OF THE WORLD’S CHALLENGES

Pedagogy and Education , UDC: 37.091:005.934 DOI: 10.25688/2076-9121.2024.18.3.01

Authors

  • Ageyeva Nataliya Sergeyevna Candidate of Philological Sciences
  • Sumenkova Julia I.
  • Fedorovskaya Maria N.

Annotation

The problem of ensuring integrated safety of schools’ learning spaces is one of the essential elements of educational leadership. This issue becomes especially acute in the view of the current global challenges, such as unprecedented boost of digital technologies, unstable political situation in the world, and high level of anxiety in society. The article is dedicated to the search for effective solutions that will ensure the integrated safety of schools, including showcasing best local and international practices, identifying pressure points and effective measures. The objective of the study was to define the conceptual framework of the problem of ensuring integrated safety of schools, and to describe different approaches to this problem in the context of the current challenges. The main method used in this study is critical literature review. The authors used the Lens.org data base of academic papers to collect the relevant data on the problem of the study, for bibliographic analysis we used the VOSviewer tool. The literature sample included 10,000 relevant academic works published by Russian and international scientists from 2010 to 2023, 58 most relevant publications have been selected for further critical analysis. The findings based on the bibliographic analysis of literature include identifying 4 major semantic clusters that reflect the key trends in educational safety research conducted by Russian and international scientists. The authors describe the academic discussion on the problem under the study, identify key terms and definitions, and main approaches to the issue developed by Russian and international researchers. The authors suggest systemic decisions to the problem and outline the prospects for further study which contribute to the development of solutions aimed at ensuring integrated safety of schools’ learning environments. The research findings may be of use for school leaders, safety experts, as well as researchers, teachers and school psychologists who are interested in creating a safe learning environment for their students.

How to link insert

Ageyeva, N. S., Sumenkova, J. I. & Fedorovskaya, M. N. (2024). THE PROBLEM OF ENSURING INTEGRATED SAFETY OF SCHOOLS’ LEARNING SPACES IN THE VIEW OF THE WORLD’S CHALLENGES Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 18 (3), 10. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2024.18.3.01
References
1. 1. Dedenko, M. M. (2019, November 8–9). Analysis of Risks and Threats of Complex Safety of Educational Environment. In: Geography and life safety — Traditions and innovations in pedagogical education. The proceedings of the All-Russia scientific and practical conference with international participation dedicated to 110 anniversary of Teachers’ Training Institute at Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk (с. 100–103). Irkutsk: The V. B. Sochava Institute of Geography SB RAS. (In Russ.).
2. 2. Yamileva, D. V., & Bikkinin, I. A. (2019). About Safety Indicators of The Educational Environment. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 8, 58–64. (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-pokazatelyah-bezopasnosti-obrazovatelnoy-sredy
3. 3. Zagrebina, E. I. (2015). To the Question of integrated safety of educational organisations. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 1, 97–103. (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-kompleksnoy-bezopasnosti-obrazovatelnyh-organizatsiy
4. 4. Govorunov, I. A., & Besschetnova, O. V. (2021). Development of a Safe Environment at an Educational Organisation. In: The contemporary problems of pedagogical and psychological education. Collection of articles of the Faculty of Psychology and Pedagogy of Saratov State University (pp. 30–35). Saratov: Saratovskyj istochnik. (In Russ.).
5. 5. Kagirov, B. N., & Kagirova, G. V. (2010). Safety of Educational Institution in Modern Conditions. Izvestiya of Altai State University, 3–2, 150–151. (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/bezopasnost-obrazovatelnogo-uchrezhdeniya-v-sovremennyh-usloviyah
6. 6. Shumakova, A. V., & Yashutkin, V. A. (2020). Methodological Basis for Training Future Teachers to Ensure the Safety of The Educational Environment of Secondary Schools. The world of science, culture and education, 5(84), 142–144. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/1991-5497-2020-00907
7. 7. Torikova, E. F., Torikov, A. V., & Kobzareva, I. I. (2020). Integrated Safety of an Education Organization. Education and Pedagogy: Contemporary Trends. Monograph (pp. 38–49). Cheboksary: Sreda. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31483/r-75856
8. 8. Gordienko, T. P., & Smirnova, O. Yu. (2019). To the Question of Measures Integrated Security in Educational Organizations. Safety as a factor of society’s sustainable development. Collection of scientific works (pp. 149–155). Simferopol: Arial. (In Russ.).
9. 9. Tyurenkova, S. A. (2022, November 25–26). The Anthropological Approach to Ensuring Safety of the Content-Methodological Component of the Learning Environment. Anthropological mission of a Russian university in the modern world. The Proceedings of the 17th International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 154–159). Stavropol. Stavropol: O. G. Timchenko. (In Russ.).
10. 10. Cornell, D. G., & Mayer, M. J. (2010). Why do school order and safety matter? Educational Researcher, 39, 7–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09357616
11. 11. Cornell, D. G., Huang, F., & Konold, T. R. (2017). Development of a Standard Model for School Climate and Safety Assessment. The Final Report. U. S. Department of Justice. 147 p. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/grants/251102.pdf
12. 12. Osher, D., Dwyer, K. P., Jimerson, S. R., & Brown, J. A. (2012). Developing safe, supportive, and effective schools: Facilitating student success to reduce school violence. In: S. R. Jimerson, A. B. Nickerson, M. J. Mayer, & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of school violence and school safety. International research and practice (2nd ed., pp. 27–44). New York, NY: Routledge.
13. 13. Thompson, N. E., & Wheeler, J. P. (2010). Learning environment: Creating and implementing a safe, supportive learning environment. In: P. Erickson, W. S. Fox, & D. Stewart (Eds.), National Standards for Teachers of Family and Consumer Sciences: Research, implementation, and resources. The National Association of Teacher Educators for Family and Consumer Sciences (pp. 235–245).
14. 14. Phillips, S. F., & Rowley, J. F. S. (2016). The Tripod School Climate Index: An invariant measure of school safety and relationships. Social Work Research, 40, 31–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/swr/svv036
15. 15. Mayer, M. J., Nickerson, A. B., & Jimerson S. R. (2021). Preventing School Violence and Promoting School Safety: Contemporary Scholarship Advancing Science, Practice, and Policy. School Psychology Review, 50, 2–3, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2021.1949933
16. 16. Kozheurov, I. V. (2023). Information Security of The Educational Environment. Nauka v zhizni cheloveka = Science in Human Life, 2, 73–89. (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/informatsionnaya-bezopasnost-obrazovatelnoy-sredy
17. 17. Bogatyreva, Yu. I., & Privalov, A. N. (2019, April, 22–26). Methodological Aspects of professional development of IT teachers to ensure informational safety of students. In: Contemporary problems of teaching IT and Mathematics at school. The Proceedings of International scientific and practical Internet-conference, Moscow (p. 518–526). Ed. by L. L. Bosovaya, D. I. Pavlov. Mosсow: Moscow State Pedagogical University. (In Russ.).
18. 18. Sichinawa, A. V. (2023). The Problem of Cyber Socialisation and Media Ascetism in the Modern Educational Practice. Pedagogical Education, 4(3), 83–86. (In Russ.).
19. 19. Ivliev, S. N., Krylova, S. L., & Kvaskov, A. A. (2020). Threats of Information Impact on Information Systems of Educational Institutions. Modern Science: Actual problems of theory and practice. Series Natural and Technical Sciences, 6, 82–87. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37882/2223-2966.2020.06.15
20. 20. Akhmetov, B. S., & Lakhno, V. A. (2022). Information Protection and Cybersecurity of the University’s Digital Educational Environment. Vestnik of Tynyshpayev Kazakh Academy of Transport and Communications, 1(120), 134–141. (In Russ.).
21. 21. Baeva, I. A. (2020). Psychological Safety of Educational Environment: How to Create and Measure It. Ecopsychological Studies – 6: Ecology of Childhood and Psychology of Sustainable Development, 6, 280–284. (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/psihologicheskaya-bezopasnost-obrazovatelnoy-sredy-kak-ee-sozdat-i-izmerit
22. 22. Samorodova, V. V. (2019). Student Self-Government as a Factor Formation of Socially Safe Environment of the University. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 6(137), 43–48. (In Russ.).
23. 23. Sidorkin, V. A. (2023). The Model of Integrated Life Safety of the Younger Generation of the Nation. Applied Psychology and Pedagogy, 8(1), 169–179. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12737/2500-0543-2023-8-1-169-179
24. 24. Filippova, S. A., & Butorina, I. A. (2023, October, 18–19). Structural and Functional Model of an Educational Professional’s Development to Ensuring Psychological Safety of the Learning Environment. In: Psychologically Safe Learning Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects (to the 85th anniversary of Tula State Pedagogical University). The Proceedings of the 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference, Tula (pp. 130–132). Cheboksary: Sreda (In Russ.).
25. 25. Kuznetsova, E. N., & Khil’ko (Shvetsova), O. V. (2020). Psychological Features of Social Anxiety, Sociophobia in Students of Pedagogical University as a Criterion of Comprehensive Safety of Educational Environment. Problems of modern pedagogical education, 69(3), 278–281. (In Russ.).
26. 26. Kindarova, Z. B., & Yarychev, N. U. (2021). Safe and comfortable environment design in a general education organization as a function and area of professional activity for future educational psychologists. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 9(3), 1–10. (In Russ.).
27. 27. Yakimanskaya, I. S. (2023). The Psychology of Safety of Learning Environment: Territory, Educational Organisation, Family. Moscow: Znanie-M. (In Russ.).
28. 28. Kakadii, I. I., & Pavlov, V. N. (2020). Subjects and Objects of Social Security in Educational Institution. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 6(1), 321–324. (In Russ.).
29. 29. Ryzhova, A. A., Ryzhova, O. A., Vlasova, A. A., & Minakova, V. V. (2022). Contemporary threats to safety in educational organizations. Vestnik of Penza State University, 2(38), 20–24. (In Russ.).
30. 30. Dovgyalo, V. K. (2022). Integrated Safety of the Learning Environment of Educational Organisations: Organisational and Legal Aspects. In: Modern System of General Education in Russia: Theoretical-Legal and Pedagogical Aspects: Collective monograph (pp. 7–31). Perm: Perm State State Humanitarian Pedagogical University. (In Russ.).
31. 31. Churilov, S. A. (2023). Approaches to Ensuring Integrated Safety of Learning Environment. Review of the National Center of Informational Counterwork to Terrorism and Extremism in the Learning Environment and Internet, 3(34), 7–10. (In Russ.).
32. 32. Mazurov, V. A., & Starodubtseva, M. A. (2021). The Problems of Resisting Ideology of Terrorism and Cyberterrorism in Modern Russia. Monograph. Barnaul: Altay State University. (In Russ.).
33. 33. Devlin, D. N., & Gottfredson, D. C. (2018). The roles of police officers in schools: Effects on the recording and reporting of crime. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 16(2), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204016680405
34. 34. Homer, E. M., & Fisher, B. W. (2020). Police in schools and student arrest rates across the United States: Examining differences by race, ethnicity, and gender. Journal of School Violence, 19(2), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2019.1604377
35. 35. Owens, E. G. (2017). Testing the school‐to‐prison pipeline. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 36(1), 11–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21954
36. 36. Theriot, M. T. (2016). The impact of school resource officer interaction on students’ feelings about school and school police. Crime & Delinquency, 62(4), 446–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128713503526
37. 37. Perumean-Chaney, S. E., & Sutton, L. M. (2013). Students and perceived school safety: The impact of school security measures. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 570–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-012-9182-2
38. 38. Skiba, R. J., & Losen, D. (2016). From reaction to prevention: Turning the page on school discipline. American Educator, 39(4), 4–11. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1086522
39. 39. Hirschfield, P. J. (2018). Schools and crime. Annual Review of Criminology, 1(1), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-092358
40. 40. Rocque, M., & Snellings, Q. (2018). The new disciplinology: Research, theory, and remaining puzzles on the school-toprison pipeline. Journal of Criminal Justice, 59, 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.05.002
41. 41. Curran, F. C. (2019). The law, policy, and portrayal of zero tolerance school discipline: Examining prevalence and characteristics across levels of governance and school districts. Educational Policy, 33(2), 319–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904817691840
42. 42. Borum, R., Cornell, D. G., Modzeleski, W., & Jimerson, S. R. (2010). What can be done about school shootings? A review of the evidence. Educational Researcher, 39(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09357620
43. 43. Woitaszewski, S., Crepeau-Hobson, F., Conolly, C., & Cruz, M. (2018). Rules, requirements, and resources for school-based threat assessment: A fifty state analysis. Contemporary School Psychology, 22(2), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-017-0161-y
44. 44. Cornell, D. G., Mayer, M. J., & Sulkowski, M. L. (2021). History and future of school safety research. School Psychology Review, 50(2–3), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1857212
45. 45. McDougall, P., & Vaillancourt, T. (2015). Long-term adult outcomes of peer victimization in childhood and adolescence: Pathways to adjustment and maladjustment. The American Psychologist, 70(4), 300–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039174
46. 46. Schoeler, T., Duncan, L., Cecil, C. M., Ploubidis, G. B., & Pingault, J. B. (2018). Quasi-experimental evidence on shortand long-term consequences of bullying victimization: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(12), 1229–1246. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000171
47. 47. Robers, S., Zhang, J., & Truman, J. (2010). Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2010 (NCES 2011-002/ NCJ 230812). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, DC. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011002.pdf
48. 48. Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 357–385. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313483907
49. 49. Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 315–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1
50. 50. Cornell, D., & Huang, F. (2016). Authoritative school climate and high school student risk behavior: A cross-sectional multi-level analysis of student self-reports. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(11), 2246–2259. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10964-016-0424-3
51. 51. Gage, N. A., Larson, A., Sugai, G., & Chafouleas, S. M. (2016). Student perceptions of school climate as predictors of office discipline referrals. American Educational Research Journal, 53(3), 492–515. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216637349
52. 52. Konold, T., Cornell, D., Shukla, K., & Huang, F. (2017). Racial / ethnic differences in perceptions of school climate and its association with student engagement and peer aggression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(6), 1289–1303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0576-1
53. 53. Konold, T., Cornell, D., Jia, Y., & Malone, M. (2018). School climate, student engagement, and academic achievement: A latent variable, multilevel multi-informant examination. AERA Open, 4(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858418815661
54. 54. Shindler, J., Jones, A., Williams, A. D., Taylor, C., & Cardenas, H. (2016). The school climate-student achievement connection: If we want achievement gains, we need to begin by improving the climate. Journal of School Administration Research and Development, 1, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.32674/jsard.v1i1.1905
55. 55. Nation, M., Splett, J. W., Voight, A., & Weist, M. (2019). School — community collaborations to promote school safety. In: M. J. Mayer, & S. R. Jimerson (Eds.). School safety and violence prevention: Science, practice, policy (pp. 273–296). American Psychological Association, . https://doi.org/10.1037/0000106-012
56. 56. Sprague, J. R., Whitcomb, S. A., & Bear, G. G. (2019). Mechanisms for promoting and integrating schoolwide discipline approaches. In: M. J. Mayer & S. R. Jimerson (Eds.), School safety and violence prevention: Science, practice, policy (pp. 95–120). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000106-005
57. 57. Scherr, T. G., & Maye, M. J. (2019). Supporting at-risk and marginalized students. In: M. J. Mayer & S. R. Jimerson (Eds.), School safety and violence prevention: Science, practice, policy (pp. 121–148). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000106-006
58. 58. Katz, J., Dymnicki, A. B., Osher, D. M., Williamson, S., & Klochikhin, E. (2019). Using actionable models to leverage local school data. In: M. J. Mayer & S. R. Jimerson (Eds.), School safety and violence prevention: Science, practice, policy (pp. 177–198). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000106-008
Download file .pdf 872.75 kb