Authors
- Bogatyrev Kirill A.
Annotation
Knowledge control is a necessary element of the pedagogical space. With a variety of certification forms, their impact on the individual in the context of the development of distance higher education programs and the growth of the edtech segment has not been sufficiently studied. The key hypothesis of the study: when conducting mixed certification with a flexible control system, students will be more satisfied with the educational process, the impact of stress factors will be reduced. The goal is to analyze the attitude of students to control during the implementation of online programs, to assess the impact of various forms of certification activities on anxiety, stress resistance and academic performance. The main research method is empirical. The sample consisted of 350 undergraduate and graduate students from leading Russian universities. To assess the indicators, the methods of A. V. Bartashev and J. Taylor, the author’s questionnaires were used. It was revealed that there are dependencies between the selected forms of control and stress resistance, anxiety, satisfaction, and academic performance. The mixed form of certification is the most preferable for students and has the least negative impact on the psyche with high final academic performance indicators. The study can be useful in designing educational experiences in the context of digital education development.
How to link insert
Bogatyrev, K. A. (2024). THE IMPACT OF VARIOUS FORMS OF ONLINE CERTIFICATION ON THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF RUSSIAN UNIVERSITIES STUDENTS Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 18 (4), 110. https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-9121-2024-4-110-125
References
1.
1. Smart Ranking (2024). Ranking of the largest companies in the online education market. (In Russ.). https://edtechs.ru/
2.
2. Karpova, O. (2024). Transition to digital: how higher education adapts to the demand for online. RBC Trends. (In Russ.). https://trends.rbc.ru/trends/education/666ac6779a7947275ee5240e
3.
3. Ismagilova, A. R., & Ismagilova V. S. (2019). The role and prospects of online learning in modern education. Bulletin of Bashkir University, 24, 746–753. (In Russ.).
4.
4. Bogatyrev, K. A. (2024). Psychological features of the choice of distance learning programs by applicants in higher educational institutions of Russia. Actual problems
of psychological knowledge, 1(66), 230–244. (In Russ.).
5.
5. Bogatyrev, K. A (2024). Metrics in distance learning: CSAT, NPS, COR. II All-Russian student scientific and practical conference “History, theory and practice of development
of pedagogical ideas in light of modern trends in education”. (In Russ.).
6.
6. Rudenko, S. S. (2008). Assessment of the quality of education at the university. Bulletin of ZabSU, 2. (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otsenka-kachestva-obrazovaniya-v-vuze
7.
7. Leybina, A. V., & Shukuryan G. A. (2020). Ways to improve the effectiveness of online education. Modern Foreign Psychology, 3, 21–33. (In Russ.).
8.
8. Filippov, V. M., & Savitskaya, N. (2014). Awarding of academic degrees is on the conscience of dissertation councils. Economics of Education, 4. (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/prisuzhdenie-uchyonyh-stepeney-na-sovesti-dissertatsionnyh-sovetov
9.
9. Nikolaeva, V. I. (2012). Using the certification procedure as a method of assessing competencies in the educational and professional environment. Territory of new opportunities,
5. (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ispolzovanie-protsedury-attestatsii-kak-metoda-otsenki-kompetentsiy-v-obrazovatelnoy-i-professionalnoy-srede
10.
10. Ilyina, V. V. (2010). Rating certification of students. Psychology and Pedagogy: Methodology and Problems of Practical Application, 11(2), 32–37. (In Russ.).
11.
11. Ryapolova, E. I. (2014). Using a Point-Rating System for Certification of Students at Orenburg State University. In: University Complex as a Regional Center of Education,
Science and Culture. Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Methodological Conference (pp. 2910–2912). (In Russ.).
12.
12. Kunina, L. G. (2018). Internet Testing as a Form of Intermediate Certification of Students. In: Humanities in a Modern University as a Basis for Intercultural Interaction. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference (pp. 114–117). St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University of Industrial Technologies and Design. (In Russ.).
13.
13. Danilova, M. V. (2017). Conducting Certification of Students Based on the Introduction of a Demonstration Exam Taking into Account the Requirements of Professional
Standards, Worldskills Standards. Scientific achievements and discoveries in the system of professional education: methodological and organisational aspects. Proceedings
of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference (pp. 76–77). (In Russ.).
14.
14. Dzhurinsky, A. N. (2016). Actual problems of development and quality of higher
education in Russia. Teacher of the XXI century, 1. (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/aktualnye-problemy-razvitiya-i-kachestva-vysshego-obrazovaniya-v-rossii
15.
15. Yakubov, A. V. (2021). Hypothetical model of student certification at the university. Higher education today, 1, 51–55. (In Russ.).
16.
16. Malygin, A. A. (2023). Assessment in student certification in modern higher education: goals and approaches. The World of University Science: Culture, Education, 9, 80–94. (In Russ.).
17.
17. Mal’shakova, I. L., & Portnov, Yu. A. (2022). Examination in the Context of Distance Learning. Psychological and Pedagogical Research, 1, 63–76. (In Russ.).
18.
18. Evgrafova, N. V., & Khromtsova, E. A. (2020). Creating Optimal Conditions for Conducting Interim Certification in the Form of an Examination in a Group of Students
with Mental Disabilities during Distance Learning. Social and Pedagogical Support for Persons with Disabilities: Theory and Practice. Collection of Articles Based on the Materials
of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference, Yalta, September 17–19, 2020. Humanitarian and Pedagogical Academy of the Crimean Federal University named
after V. I. Vernadsky, 189–190. (In Russ.).
19.
19. Dyatlova, K. D., & Kolpakov, I. A. (2012). Pedagogical and psychological assessment of first-year students in order to individualize their learning. Bulletin of UNN, 4(1).
(In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pedagogiko-psihologicheskaya-otsenka-studentov-pervogo-kursa-s-tselyu-individualizatsii-ih-obucheniya
20.
20. Kokareva, V. Yu. (2007). Psychological criteria for assessing students’ educational activities at a university: specialty 19.00.07 “Pedagogical Psychology”. Dissertation
for the degree of PhD in Psychology. 233 p. (In Russ.).
21.
21. Vasilyeva, A. (2020). The student’s hands should be visible on the screen. (In Russ.). https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/4314144
22.
22. Bogatyrev, K. A. (2020). Cancellation of state examinations in higher educational institutions during the spread of coronavirus infection: pros and cons. Eurasian Union
of Scientists, 5–1(74), 20–22. (In Russ.).
23.
23. Mityaeva, A. M., & Ibrahim, A. A. (2021). Forms of knowledge control of university students in the context of distance learning. Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University.
Series: Pedagogy, 4, 161–172. (In Russ.).
24.
24. Pomelova, Yu. (2024). 4 ways to assess knowledge in an online course without assessing teachers. Skillbox. (In Russ.). https://skillbox.ru/media/education/4-sposoba-otsenit-znaniya-na-onlaynkurse-bez-proveryayushchikh-prepodavateley/
25.
25. Zemlyanskaya, E. N. (2016). Formative assessment (assessment for learning) of students’ educational achievements. Modern Foreign Psychology, 3, 50–58. (In Russ.).
26.
26. SberUniversity (2022). Knowledge testing: methodology and approaches. (In Russ.). https://sberuniversity.ru/upload/iblock/06a/EduTech_48_web_demo.pdf
27.
27. Anyushenkova, O. N. (2024). Prevention of cheating in online exams with proctoring in higher education. The world of science, culture, education, 1(104), 139–141. (In Russ.).
28.
28. Prokofiev, A. V. (2024). Online proctoring at the university (starting points of ethical analysis). Sheets of Applied Ethics, 1(63), 38–76. (In Russ.).
29.
29. Shmeleva, E. D. (2015). Academic dishonesty in contemporary universities: A review of theoretical approaches and empirical research results. Economic Sociology, 2, 55–79. (In Russ.).