Authors
- Tararina Larisa I. PhD in Education, Associate Professor
- Bakshaeva Elena V. PhD in Education
- Ivanova Elvira A. PhD in Sociology, Associate Professor
Annotation
The article examines the issue of assessing the professionalism of teaching staff within the framework of the National Qualifications System of the Russian Federation (NQS RF). A comparison is made between the established practice of teacher certification and the mechanism of independent assessment of qualifications. Based on the analysis conducted, domestic and international approaches to the assessment of teaching staff are systematized, deficiencies in existing and developing assessment tools are identified, and the potential of independent assessment of qualifications for the education management system is described. The methodological foundation of the study comprises a comparative analysis of assessment models and a theoretical literature review. The conducted analysis suggests that there is terminological and conceptual confusion in Russian practice: qualification (a resource) is often assessed through the lens of performance outcomes, which leads to unreliable assessment results. Furthermore, there is a significant gap between the Unified Federal Assessment Materials and the actual demands (expectations) of heads of educational institutions. The key conclusion of the study is that for the independent assessment of teacher qualifications to become an effective tool for managing the quality of teaching staff,
it must respond to the specific demands of employers, ensure transparency of the assessment procedure, be integrated into a broader system of formative assessment and professional development, while remaining independent from administrative and managerial decisions.
How to link insert
Tararina, L. I., Bakshaeva, E. V. & Ivanova, E. A. (2026). PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS OF TEACHING STAFF: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ASSESSMENT PRACTICES AND MANAGEMENT NEEDS IN THE EDUCATION SYSTEM Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 20 (2), 111. https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-9121-2026-2-111-121
References
1.
1. Tan, Y. S. M., & Amiel, J. J. (2022). Teachers learning to apply neuroscience to classroom instruction: case of professional development in British Columbia. Professional Development in Education, 48(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1689522
2.
2. Tonga, Funda, Eryiğit, Sümeyra, Yalçın, Fatma, & Erden, Feyza. (2019). Professional development of teachers in PISA achiever countries: Finland, Estonia, Japan, Singapore and China. Professional Development in Education, 48, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1689521
3.
3. Kim, Taeyeon, & Lee, Youngjun. (2020). Principal Instructional Leadership for Teacher Participation in Professional Development: Evidence from Japan, Singapore, and South Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21, 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09616-x
4.
4. Fang, G., Chan, P. W. K., & Kalogeropoulos, P. (2021). Secondary School Teachers’ Professional Development in Australia and Shanghai: Needs, Support, and Barriers. Sage Open, 11(3).
5.
5. Vachkova, S. N., Nekhorosheva, E. V., & Salakhova, V. B. (2023). Research on families’ strategies for primary and basic general education: socio-psycho-logical aspect. MCU Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology, 17(1), 66–95. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2023.17.1.04
6.
6. Diplomatova, Z. Yu., & Ivanov, V. N. (2019). Teacher career growth in the context of implementing the professional standard of a teacher. Bulletin of the Chuvash Article Pedagogic University Named After I. Ya. Yakovlev, 2(102), 82–90. (In Russ.).
7.
7. Seebruck, R. (2021). How teacher rotation in Japanese high schools affects the clustering of teacher quality: Comparing the distribution of teachers across public and private education sectors. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 29, 91. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.29.5362
8.
8. Ahn, Ruth, Shimojima, Yasuko, Mori, Hisayoshi, & Asanuma, Shigeru. (2018). Japan’s innovative approach to professional learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 100, 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721718815674
9.
9. Zhang, N., & Liu, Q. (2018). A comparative analysis of Lesson Study models in Japan, the USA and the UK: Implications for teacher professional development. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1145/3231848.3231880

