Home Releases 18 (2)

MODEL OF INVOLVING STUDENTS IN EDUCATIONAL WORK THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIA

Pedagogy and Education , UDC: 371.485 DOI: 10.25688/2076-9121.2024.18.2.01

Authors

  • Ivanova Elena Vladimirovna PhD in Psychology, Associate Professor
  • Mayakova Elizaveta Vladimirovna PhD in Pedagogy
  • Barsukova Ekaterina M.

Annotation

The relevance of the work is due to significant changes that are taking place in the Russian education and are associated primarily with the strengthening of the educational agenda and the development of new mechanisms that allow influencing the younger generation through active communication channels, through the activities of youth organizations and associations, youth communities. One of the main strategies of educational influence on students of educational organizations of basic/secondary general and secondary vocational education seems to be interaction and influence on them through social media, since for the modern generation of teenagers and young people, popular social media and the Internet are actively used for communication and interaction. The problem of the study lies in the fact that within the learning space of schools and colleges, virtual space is not recognized as a full-fledged component which provides a media for dynamic exchange of communicative, informational and cognitive content. Therefore, it is necessary to consider social media in the context of educational / upbringing potential, active communications between students of basic/secondary general and secondary vocational education and define how the educational work with the youth is organized through social media. The round table was one of the formats of organizing a discussion on issues of educational work. The leading research method was focus groups. In the result of the discussions, the issues of conducting educational work with students through social media in educational organizations of basic/secondary general and secondary vocational education have been clarified. The study sample consisted of 80 people from 4 educational organizations of basic/ secondary general education, and 1 organization of secondary vocational education. The materials presented in the article made it possible to build a model of involving youth communities in the educational work through social media, as well as to identify its elements: the Department of Education and Science of Moscow, organizations subordinate to the Department of Education and Science of Moscow, an educational organization, the virtual space of an educational organization, youth communities in social media, and students who are targeted by educational influence through social media; define the main objective and the tasks of the model, its target audience, principles, and mechanisms for implementing the model; provide its description. The model developed by the authors will help increase the effectiveness of educational work by involving students through social media.

How to link insert

Ivanova, E. V., Mayakova, E. V. & Barsukova, E. M. (2024). MODEL OF INVOLVING STUDENTS IN EDUCATIONAL WORK THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIA Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 18 (2), 10. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2024.18.2.01
References
1. 1. Basarab, T., & O’Donovan, D. (2020). Essentials of youth work. European Union, & Council of Europe. 24 pp. (In Russ.). https://pjp-eu.coe.int/documents/42128013/90268416/Youth+Work+Essentials+RUS.pdf/a12df298-7f21-c0e5-104b-e06d742c6a8e?t=1630581558000
2. 2. Markova, V., Pleshakov, V., Shesterina, A., & Zakharyashcheva, O. (2021, January). Practices of teaching and upbringing of young people in the Internet space. SHS Web of Conferences, 98, 05011. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219805011
3. 3. Moroz, N. A., & Yudina, E. N. (2022). Youth practices in social networks in the context of the concept of life world of the modern young generation. Theory and practice of social development, 1, 36–41. (In Russ.).
4. 4. Hatch, T., Hill, K., & Roegman, R. (2019). Instruction, equity, and social networks in district-wide improvement. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 17(10). https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-07-2019-0018
5. 5. Neumann, M. M., Hannah Soong, E. P., & Selim, N. (2022). Exploring the social media networks of primary school children. Education 3–13 — International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2022.2144404
6. 6. Anzano-Oto, S., Vázquez-Toledo, S., & Latorre-Cosculluela, C. (2023, June). Digital reality in Compulsary Secondary Education: uses, purposes and profiles in social networks. New Review of Information Networking, vol. 28, issue 1–2, 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614576.2023.2219244
7. 7. Saraeva, S. D. (2021). Social networks and their role in the system of education of schoolchildren. In: Upbringing as a strategic priority. Proceedings of the Conference, Yekaterinburg, 2021, April 15–16 (part 4, pp. 452–457). Yekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University. (In Russ.).
8. 8. Roncaglia, G. (2021, July). School Libraries and Social Networks. IASL Annual Conference Proceedings: A Rich Tapestry of Practice and Research Around the World. https://doi.org/10.29173/iasl7649
9. 9. Romm, T. A., & Romm, M. V. (2021). Education in the digital age. Izvestiya Saratov University. New series. Series: Acmeology of Education. Developmental Psychology, 10, 4(40), 360–366. (In Russ.).
10. 10. Terkulova, I. N. (2017). Features of the use of information and communication technologies in the socialization of students in French-speaking countries. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 2, 77–83. (In Russ.).
11. 11. Voropaev, M. V. (2010). Upbringing in virtual environments. Monograph (scientific ed. by A. V. Mudrik). Moscow: Moscow City University. (In Russ.).
12. 12. Pleshakov, V. A., & Ugolkov, N. В. (2012). Socialization of high school students on the Internet as a problem of pedagogy. Modern problems of science and education, 5, 176–177. (In Russ.).
13. 13. Polyakov, S. D., & Tasimova, N. V. (2019). Educational activities using the Internet — synthesis of traditions and innovations. In: Personality in the situation of social changes. Proceedings of the conference (pp. 459–461). (In Russ.).
14. 14. Pronina, L. N. (2016). Model of the educational system of the school. Scientific and methodological electronic journal “Concept”, 17, 1–5. (In Russ.). http://e-koncept.ru/2016/46166.htm
15. 15. Slettbakk, А., & Engvik, G. (2022). Social networks and school development. In: Ledelse innenfra (pp. 265–290). Publisher: Fagbokforlaget.
16. 16. Elyakim, N., Buskila, Y., Chen-Levi, T., Altarac, H. & Shaked, L. (2023). Leading the hidden school: a principal’s presence in social media networks. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 13323–13347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11702-y
17. 17. Kirik, T. A. (2007). Virtual reality and its ontological prototypes. Monograph. Kurgan: Izd-vo Kurgan State University. 134 p. (In Russ.).
18. 18. Klikushina, N. Y. (2009). The concept of virtual reality in the course of history and philosophy of science. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, XXII, 4, 86–103. (In Russ.). http://www.intelros.ru/pdf/eps/04/11.pdf
19. 19. Kasyanov, V. V. (2018). Virtual space as a new – “old” sociocultural phenomenon. Scientific notes of the V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University. Sociology. Pedagogy. Psychology, 4(70) (2S), 38–42. (In Russ.). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/virtualnoe-prostranstvo-kak-novyy-staryy-sotsiokulturnyy-fenomen/viewer
20. 20. Mudrik, A. V. (2008). Upbringing as an integral part of the process of socialization. Vestnik PSTGU. VI Pedagogy and Psychology, 3(10), 7–24. (In Russ.).
21. 21. Kupriyanov, B. V. (2006). Social education in institutions of additional education of children (an attempt to substantiate the concept). Education and Science, 2(38), 48–55. (In Russ.).
22. 22. Romm, T. A., & Romm, M. V. (2018). Network horizons of the upbringing systems theory. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya pedagogika. National and Foreign Pedagogy, 1 (4(52)), 54–66. (In Russ.).
23. 23. Prepis, A. (2008). The values of the world heritage and the younger generation. Naslediye i sovremennostʼ, 1, 3, 7–19.
24. 24. Pleshakov, V. A., & Ugolkov, N. V. (2013). Internet as a factor of cybersocialization of youth. Pedagogy. Psychology. Social work. Juvenology. Sociokinetics, 31, 117–120. (In Russ.).
25. 25. Pettersson, F. (2021). Understanding digitalization and educational change in school by means of activity theory and the levels of learning concept. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10239-8
26. 26. Voropaev, M. V. (2011). Socialization and education in virtual and mixed realities. Bulletin of the Russian Humanitarian Science Foundation, 3(64), 131–138. (In Russ.).
27. 27. Ermolin, A. A. (2014). Youth policy as a national system of reproduction of worldclass human capital. Narodnoe obrazovanie, 7(1440), 9–19. (In Russ.).
28. 28. Ermolin, A. A. (2022). Archetypal model of competencies of the Russian school graduate as a system of target results of education. Narodnoe Obrazovanie, 1(1490), 143–149 (In Russ.).
29. 29. Beck, D., & Purcell, R. (2010). Popular education practice for youth and community development work. SAGE Publications, Inc. 43 p. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526435774
30. 30. Barriga, L. P. (2023). Education Through Organizations with a Purpose in Social Networks. In: García-Peñalvo, F. J., García-Holgado, A. (Eds). Proceedings TEEM 2022: Tenth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. TEEM 2022. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0942-1_83
31. 31. Lisitsa, E. S., & Konstantinova, A. S. (2013). Mechanisms and technologies of the impact of youth socio-political organizations on the political activity of Russian youth. Modern problems of science and education, 5. (In Russ.). https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=10705
32. 32. Proskura, O. V., & Gerasimchuk, I. Y. (2014). The concept of mobility. Types of mobility. Academic mobility. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 13(342); Education and health care, 4, 94–98. (In Russ.).
33. 33. Krutalevich, A. N. (2015). Mobility as a value characteristic of the culture of the newest time. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 9(364); Philosophy. Sociology. Kulturologia, 36, 71–74. (In Russ.).
34. 34. Loginov, K. V., & Shikov, A. N. (2020). Applications of gamification in the process of management of training, adaptation and development of personnel. Informatics and Education, 9, 28–37. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32517/0234-0453-2020-35-9-28-37
35. 35. Abdalina, L. V. (2022). Personalization as a leading educational trend of modernity. Vestnik Voronezh State University. Series: Problems of Higher Education, 2, 10–13. (In Russ.).
36. 36. Kostycheva, A. (2022, February 9). Delegation of authority. UNISENDER. The marketer's dictionary. https://www.unisender.com/ru/glossary/chto-takoe-delegirovanie-polnomochiy/
37. 37. Krongauz, M. A. (Ed.) (2018). Razvirtualization. Language Dictionary интернета.ru. Moscow: AST-Press. 288 p. (Dictionaries for intellectual gourmets. Dictionaries of the XXI century). ISBN 978-5-462-01853-4.
Download file .pdf 685.36 kb