Authors
- Karpova Svetlana Ivanovna PhD in Pedagogy
- Savenkova Tatiana Dmitrievna PhD in Pedagogy
Annotation
The relevance of the research problem is due to the need to find effective ways to form the readiness of teachers at secondary schools of the municipal education system to identify, train and develop intellectually gifted students. As practice shows, schoolteachers are experiencing serious difficulties in the use of diagnostic techniques, developing technologies for teaching gifted students; in the development of copyright programs for taught disciplines; in the organization of various forms of educational and extracurricular activities. Ttherefore they need professional help and support from professional scientists in the field of children’s giftedness. Purpose is to develop and test a program of psychological and pedagogical support for the formation of teachers’ readiness to work with intellectually gifted students in the context of social and pedagogical partnership of a municipal secondary school and professional scientists in the development of children’s giftedness. Methods: theoretical analysis (retrospective, comparative, analysis and generalization of pedagogical experience); empirical (observation, questioning, conversation, pedagogical experiment, mathematical and static methods). The study sample consisted of 315 people (35 teachers, 280 students). The program of psychological and pedagogical support developed and implemented under the scientific supervision of Professor A.I. Savenkov contributed to increasing the level of professional and personal readiness of teachers to work with intellectually gifted students; increasing the level of development of students’ creativity, general and social intelligence, and, as a consequence, increasing the number of schoolchildren — winners and prize- winners of subject Olympiads, intellectual and creative competitions. The materials presented in the article make it possible to build a system of psychological and pedagogical support for teachers’ activities in identifying, teaching and developing intellectually gifted students in the context of social and pedagogical partnership of municipal administration bodies, secondary schools and s professional scientists in the development of children’s giftedness.
How to link insert
Karpova, S. I. & Savenkova, T. D. (2021). Formation of Secondary Schools Teachers Readiness to Work with Intellectually Gifted Students Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", № 2 (56), 60-83. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2021.56.2.04
References
1.
Ahmed, K., Abdel–Al, I. & Thompson, J. (2020). Learning and Thinking Styles of Mentally Talented Students in Public and Private Schools. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8 (11B), 6103–6115. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.082246. Retrieved from https://www.hrpub.org/download/20201130/UJER46-19520405.pdf (access date: 17.06.2021).
2.
Akar, I. (2020). Consensus on the Competencies for a Classroom Teacher to Support Gifted Students in the Regular Classroom: A Delphi Study. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16 (1), 67–83. DOI: 10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.6. Retrieved from https://ijpe.penpublishing.net/makale/1252 (access date: 17.06.2021).
3.
Bayraktar, A., Ateş, H. & Afat, N. (2019). An analysis on the relationship between primary school teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and attitudes towards gifted education. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 38 (10), 1099–1124. DOI: 10.35826/ijoess.2484. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340511483_AN_ANALYSIS_ON_THE_RELATIONSHIP_BETWEEN_PRIMARY_SCHOOL_TEACHERS’_SELF-EFFICACY_BELIEFS_AND_ATTITUDES_TOWARDS_GIFTED_EDUCATION_1 (access date: 17.06.2021).
4.
Bishop, W. E. (1968). Successful teachers of the gifted. Exceptional Children, 34 (5), 317–325. DOI: 10.1177/001440296803400502. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001440296803400502 (access date: 17.06.2000).
5.
Cropley, A. (1986). Preparing teachers of the gifted. International Review of Education, 32 (2), 125–136. DOI: 10.1007/BF00620383. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00620383 (access date: 15.06.2003).
6.
Cülha, A., Ateş, R. & Nazl, K. (2018). Özel Yetenekli Öğrencilerin İdeal Öğretmene İlişkin Metaforları [Special Talented Students’ Metaphors Regarding the Ideal Teacher]. Harran Education Journal, 3 (1), 39–51. (In Turkish). DOI: 10.22596/2018.0301.39.51 Retrieved from https://docplayer.biz.tr/208964766-Ozel-yetenekli-ogrencilerin-ideal-ogret-mene-iliskin-metaforlari.html (access date: 17.06.2021).
7.
Feldhusen, J., Hansen, J. (1988). Teachers of the Gifted: Preparation and Supervision. Exceptional Children, 5 (2). Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com doi:10.1177/026142948800500206 (access date: 17.06.2003).
8.
Flores, J., Bravo, J., Dolores, M., Sierra, V. & Rosal, Á. (2020). Efectos de un programa de orientación a padres de hijos con altas capacidades. [Effects of an orientation program for parents of children with high abilities]. Talincrea, 13 (7), 32–47. (In Spanish). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345973159 (access date: 09.08.2020).
9.
Gallagher, J. J. (1966) Research Summary on Gifted Child Education. Non-Journal Publication. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/ERIC_ED026750 (access date: 17.06.2003).
10.
Gilbukh, Y. Z. (1991). Attention: gifted children [Vnimanie: odarennye deti]. Moscow: Znanie. (In Russian). Retrieved from https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01001604437 (access date: 09.08.2006).
11.
Giza, T. (2020). Teachers’ Attitude towards Educating Talented Students. SPI, 23 (4), 135–155. DOI: 10.12775/SPI.2020.4.006. Retrieved from https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/api/file/viewByFileId/1156586.pdf (access date: 17.06.2021).
12.
Gnas, J., Preckel, F. & Müllensiefen, D. (2020). Was denken Musikschullehrkräfte über musikalisch hochbegabte Schülerinnen und Schüler? [What do music teachers think about musically gifted students? An experimental investigation]. Beiträge empirischer Musikpädagogik, 11, 1–33. (In German). Retrieved from https://www.b-em.info/index.php/ojs/article/view/182 (access date: 06.09.2020).
13.
Golubichnaia, E. V. (2019). Features of the organization of teacher training for working with gifted children in the municipal education system [Osobennosti organizatsii podgotovki pedagoga k rabote s odarennymi det’mi v munitsipal’noi sisteme obrazovaniia]. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 1, 98-112. (In Russian). Retrieved from https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37278556& (access date: 02.11.2019).
14.
Gómez-Arízaga, M., Conejeros-Solar, M. & Martin, A. (2016). How Good Is Good Enough? A Community-Based Assessment of Teacher Competencies for Gifted Students. SAGE Open, 6 (4), 1–14. DOI: 10.1177/2158244016680687. Retrieved from https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/311320748_How_Good_Is_Good_Enough_A_Community-Based_Assessment_of_Teacher_Competencies_for_Gifted_Students (access date: 17.06.2021).
15.
Gómez-Arízaga, M., Valdivia-Lefort, M., Castillo-Hermosilla, H. & Hébert, T. (2020). Tales from Within: Gifted Students’ Lived Experiences with Teaching Practices in Regular Classrooms. Education Sciences, 10 (5), 1–23. DOI: 10.3390/educsci10050137. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1255136.pdf (access date: 17.06.2021).
16.
Iurkevich, V. S. (2018). Intellectual giftedness and social development: contradictory connection [Intellektual’naia odarennost’ i sotsial’noe razvitie: protivorechivaia sviaz’]. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, 7 (2), 28–38. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17759/ jmfp.2018070203. Retrieved from https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35629232 (access date: 17.06.2021).
17.
Kashani-Vahid, L., Afrooz, G., Shokoohi-Yetka, M., Kharrazi, K. & Ghobari, B. (2017). Can a creative interpersonal problem-solving program improve creative thinking in gifted elementary students? Think. Ski. Creat, 24, 75–185. DOI: 10.1016/j. tsc.2017.02.011. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315318207_Can_a_Creative_Interpersonal_Problem_Solving_Program_Improve_Creative_Thinking_in_Gifted_Elementary_Students (access date: 17.06.2021).
18.
Kashapov, M. M. (2016). Preparing a teacher to work with gifted students [Podgotovka uchitelia k rabote s odarennymi obuchaemymi]. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series «Psychology», 2016, 16, 3–13. (In Russian). Retrieved from https://izvestiapsy.isu.ru/en/article/file?id=634 (access date: 29.11.2016).
19.
Kerry, T. (1983). Finding and Helping the Able ChiM. London: Croom Helm. Retrieved from https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/5037158-finding-and-helping-the-able-child (access date: 17.06.2003).
20.
Leikin, R. (2019). Developing mathematical talent in schoolchildren: Who, what, and how? The psychology of high performance: Developing human potential into do-main-specific talent, 1, 193–199. DOI: 10.1037/0000120-009
21.
Leites, N. S. (1997). Age endowments and individual differences: collection of Acad. of ped. and social Sciences [Vozrastnaia odarennost’ i individual’nye razlichiia: kollekciya Akad. ped. i soc. nauk]. Moscow: Institute of Pract. Psychology. (In Russian). Retrieved from https://bookskeeper.ru/knigi/psihologiya-filosofiya/157482-vozrast-naya-odarennost-i-individualnye-razlichiya.html (access date: 07.10.2003).
22.
Maker, C. J. (1984). Curriculum Development for the Gifted. Rockeville: Aspen Systems Corporation (ISBN 0-89443-347-4/392 S.) [Sammelrezension]. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 33, 36–37. Retrieved from https://www.pedocs.de/ volltexte/2010/2321/pdf/Rez_Maker_Teaching_Models_Education_Gifted_1984_W_D_A.pdf (access date: 17.06.2021).
23.
Matheis, S., Keller, L., Kronborg, L., Schmitt, M. & Preckel, F. (2019). Do stereotypes strike twice? Giftedness and gender stereotypes in preservice teachers’ beliefs about student characteristic in Australia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 48 (2), 213–232. DOI: 10.1080/1359866X.2019.1576029. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1359866X.2019.1576029 (access date: 17.06.2021).
24.
Matiushkin, A. M. & Iakovleva, E. L. (1991). Teacher for the gifted [Uchitel’ dlia odarennykh]. Social movements and social activity of youth: Proceedings of the All-Union scientific conference «Man in the system of social relations» [Obshhestvenny`e dvizheniya i social`naya aktivnost` molodezhi: matly Vsesoyuz. nauch. konf. «Chelovek v sisteme obshhestvenny`x otnoshenii»], 192–202. Moscow; Krasnodar: Acad. of sciences of the USSR. (In Russian). Retrieved from https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01001592918 (access date: 12.10.2002).
25.
Newland, T. E. (1962). Some observations on essential qualifications of teachers of the mentally superior. Exceptional Children, 29, 111–114. Retrieved from http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/journal/journallist (access date: 11.06.2000).
26.
Plunkett, M. & Kronborg, L. (2019). Teaching Gifted Education to Pre-service Teachers: Lessons Learned. Handbook of Giftedness and Talent Development in the Asia-Pacific, 1. First Online: 09 January 2021, 1409–1430. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007%2F978-981-13-3021-6_67-1 (access date: 09.01.2021).
27.
Renzulli J. S. (1968). ‘Identifying key feature in programs for the gifted’. Exceptional Children, 35 (3), 217–221. DOI: 10.1177%2F001440296803500303
28.
Rivadeneyra-Espinoza, L., Rivera-Grados, D., Sedeño-Monge, V., López-García C. & Soto-Vega, E. (2016). La capacitación del profesorado del alumnado sobresaliente. [The training of teachers of the outstanding student]. Tendencias Pedagógicas, 28, 45–54. DOI: 10.15366/TP2016.28.04. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345973159 (access date: 17.06.2021).
29.
Rogers, K. (2019). Australian Teachers Who Made a Difference: Secondary Gifted Student Perceptions of Teaching and Teacher Effectiveness. Handbook of Giftedness and Talent Development in the Asia-Pacific, 1, 1431–1455. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-3021-6_68-1 (access date: 12.03.2019).
30.
Rogers, K. B. (1989). Training teachers of the gifted: What do they need to know? Roeper Review, 11 (3), 145–150. DOI: 10.1080/02783198909553191
31.
Sánchez-Escobedo, P., Valdés-Cuervo, E., Contreras-Olivera, G., García-Vázquez, F. & Durón-Ramos, M. (2020). Mexican Teachers’ Knowledge about Gifted Children: Relation to Teacher Teaching Experience and Training. Sustainability, 12 (4474), 1–9. DOI: 10.3390/su12114474
32.
Savenkov, A., Karpova, S. & Suhova, E. (2018). Model of Development of Children’s Giftedness in the Russian Education System. Psychology (Savannah, Ga.), 55 (2), 74–84. Retrieved from https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38645516 (access date: 06.08.2018).
33.
Savenkov, A. I. (2020). Psychology of children’s giftedness: a textbook for universities [Psikhologiia detskoi odarennosti: uchebnik dlia vuzov]. Moscow: Yurayt. (In Russian).
34.
Seeley, K. R. (1979). ‘Competencies for teachers of gifted and talented children’. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 3, 7–13.
35.
Selvi, A. M. (1953). Preparing teachers for the education of the gifted. Educational Administration and Supervision, 39, 493–499. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/00346543029005408 (access date: 13.07.2000).
36.
Sleeter C., Montecinos C. & Jiménez F. (2016). Preparing teachers for social justice in the context of education policies that deepen class segregation in schools: The case of Chile. Teacher Education for High Poverty Schools, 2, 171–191. Retrieved from https:// www.academia.edu/17161566/Preparing_Teachers_for_Social_Justice_in_the_Context_of_Education_Policies_that_Deepen_Class_Segregation_in_Schools_The_Case_of_Chile (access date: 12.08.2016).
37.
Sisk, D. (1975). ‘Teaching the gifted and talented teachers: A training model’. Gifted Child Quarterly, 19, 81–88. DOI: 10.1177%2F001698627501900115
38.
Shiner, S. M. (1986). Design and Implementation of a Humanistic, Holistic Training Program for Teachers of Gifted. Gifted International, 3, 64–77.
39.
Valadez-Sierra, M., Borges, Á. & Zambrano, R. (2016). La capacitación del profesorado del alumnado sobresaliente [The training of teachers of the outstanding student]. Talincrea, 4, 15–26. (In Spanish). URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345973159 (access date: 28.08.2016).
40.
Zulhafizh, Z. (2021). Indonesian Secondary Teachers’ Creative Teaching. İlköğretim Online, 20 (1), 1176–1184. DOI: 10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.105.
Retrieved from https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/348752045_Indonesian_Secondary_Teachers‘_Creative_Teaching (access date: 17.06.2021).