Authors
- Amonashvili Shalva A. Doctor of Psychology, Professor
- Galieva Marina Gennadievna
Annotation
Pedagogy is a holistic life of children and adults, where parents, within the framework of a humane approach, are given the main pedagogical role. The Russian pedagogical community is focused on humane pedagogy and strives to interact with parents. Through a theoretical analysis of the domestic experience of interaction between teachers and parents, it was determined that parents of primary school children are more willing to interact with teachers, and their requests are more focused on the activities of the child “outside” the family. Parents of teenage children show great interest in issues related to interpersonal relationships with their children. Accordingly, it seems relevant to develop recommendations for interaction with parents of children of different ages. The purpose of the study is to determine the features of the implementation of the principles of humane pedagogy in working with parents of primary school and adolescent children. The leading research method was the development and testing of questionnaires “Aspects of family education” for parents of primary school and adolescent children. The study involved 20 parents
from these categories, a comparative analysis of the results of a survey of parents of young and adolescent children was carried out. According to the results of the testing, it was determined that parents of children of both ages demonstrate the need to expand their general ideas and knowledge about the age and psychological characteristics of their children. However, parents of teenage children are less focused on the organization of educational activities of their children, but are more interested in the issues of individual personality characteristics and features of personal contact with them. The use of questionnaire data is relevant for determining the targets of work with parents of primary school and adolescent children, as well as for evaluating the effectiveness of interaction with them. The results will help to determine the individual qualities of the child, the features of the family system, the features of the child’s interaction with the school, as well as the features of the interaction of parents with the educational organization of their child.
How to link insert
Amonashvili, S. A. & Galieva, M. G. (2022). FEATURES OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLES OF HUMANE PEDAGOGY IN WORKING WITH PARENTS OF CHILDREN OF DIFFERENT AGES Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 16(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2022.16.2.08
References
1.
1. Korotkova, M. S. (2016). Experience of interaction with parents within the framework of humane and personal pedagogy. Young Scientist, 11(115), 1467–1469. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26425153 (date of access: 01.14.2022). (In Russ.).
2.
2. Amonashvili, Sh. A., & Galieva, M. G. (2020). Features of the implementation of the principles of humane pedagogy in working with parents. Proceedings of the Institute of Pedagogy and Educational Psychology, 3, 16–23. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44031285 (date of access: 01.14.2022). (In Russ.).
3.
3. Amonashvili, Sh. A. (2016). The Art of Family Education: A Pedagogical Essay (pp. 215–216). Moscow: Amrita-Rus. https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01008150439 (date of access: 01.14.2022). (In Russ.).
4.
4. Arapova, P. I. (2018). The ideas of the humane and personal approach of Sh. A. Amonashvili in modern educational conditions. Ideas and practices of a humanepersonal approach in modern educational conditions. Collection of articles (pp. 19–25). Moscow: Ekon-Inform. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36926078&pff=1 (date of access: 01.14.2022). (In Russ.).
5.
5. Ilyushina, N. N. (2018). Scientific and pedagogical prerequisites of humane pedagogy Sh. A. Amonashvili. Ideas and practices of a humane-personal approach in modern educational conditions. Collection of articles (pp. 7–18). Moscow: Ekon-inform. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36926076&pff=1 (date of access: 01.14.2022). (In Russ.).
6.
6. Apetyan, M. K. (2014). Psychological and age characteristics of a younger student. Young Scientist, 14(73), 243–244. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21957215 (date of access: 01.14.2022). (In Russ.).
7.
7. Danilova, E. E. (2008). Interaction of a psychologist with parents of primary school children. Bulletin of practical psychology of education: scientific and methodological journal, 3(16), 85–91. https://psyjournals.ru/vestnik_psyobr/2008/n3/28559.shtml (date of access: 01.14.2022). (In Russ.).
8.
8. Kabardaeva, D. A. (2019). Psychological characteristics of primary school age children. Breakthrough scientific research: problems, patterns, prospects. Collection of articles of the XIII International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 352–354). https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38180612 (date of access: 01.14.2022). (In Russ.).
9.
9. Molodichenko, T. A. (2017). Psychological counseling of parents of younger schoolchildren as a direction of interaction between family and school. Actual problems of teaching in elementary school. Kiryushkin readings. Materials of the All-Russian scientific-practical conference (pp. 224–228). Saratov: Saratov source. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30097454 (date of access: 01.14.2022). (In Russ.).
10.
10. Boyazitova, T. D. (2019). Topical issues of psychological counseling of children, adolescents and their parents. Collection of scientific papers based on the materials of the International scientific-practical conference dedicated to the 110th anniversary of the birth of F. Dolto (pp. 199–205). Eastern European Institute of Psychoanalysis. Saint Petersburg. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37540244 (date of access: 01.14.2022). (In Russ.).
11.
11. Tachkova, M. B. (2009). The role of the family in the life of a teenager. Journal: GEO-SIBERIA, 6, 270–272. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18086281 (date of access: 01.14.2022). (In Russ.).
12.
12. Novikova, G. V., Umnyashova, I. B., & Zaporozhskaya, D. E. (2017). Psychological assistance to parents of “independent” teenagers. Bulletin of Practical Educational Psychology, 2(51), 74–79. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37028288 (date of access: 01.14.2022). (In Russ.).
13.
13. Semenova, A. V. (2020). Personal characteristics in adolescence and adolescence. Pedagogy: History, perspectives, 3(3), 74–83. Krasnodar Multidisciplinary Institute of Additional Education. Saint Petersburg. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44067693 (date of access: 01.14.2022). (In Russ.).
14.
14. Fitchett, P. G., & Moore, S. B. (2021). Democratizing social studies teacher education through mediated field experiences and practice-based teacher education. The Journal of Social Studies Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2021.09.005
15.
15. Nessipbayeva, O. (2013). Spiritual-Moral Nurture of the Person through Folk Pedagogy. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1722–1729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.106
16.
16. Aryabkina, I. (2015). Pedagogical Model of Primary School Teacher Cultural and Aesthetic Competence Formation Using Personality Oriented Approach. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.587
17.
17. Sipman, G., Martens, R., Thölke, J., & McKenney, S. (2021). Professional development focused on intuition can enhance teacher pedagogical tact. Teaching
and Teacher Education, 106, 103442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103442
18.
18. Banshchikova, T., Solomonov, V., & Fomina, E. (2015). Attitudes and Tolerance in the Structure of Individual Readiness for Intercultural Interaction. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 916–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.753
19.
19. Mirascieva, S. (2011). Didactical principles in the teaching and education for human relations. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1401–1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.301
20.
20. Bradshaw, C. P., Waasdorp, T. E., & Leaf, P. J. (2012). Effects of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports on child behavior problems. Pediatrics, 130(5), e1136–e1145. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-0243
21.
21. Samuels, W. E. (2018). Nurturing kindness naturally: A humane education program’s effect on the prosocial behavior of first and second graders across China. International Journal of Educational Research, 91, 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.08.001
22.
22. Brownell, C. A., Svetlova, M., Anderson, R., Nichols, S. R., & Drummond, J. (2013). Socialization of early prosocial behavior: Parents’ talk about emotions is associated with sharing and helping in toddlers. Infancy, 18(1), 91–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2012.00125.x
23.
23. Kessler, M. (2021). Investigating connections between teacher identity and pedagogy in a content-based classroom. System, 100, 102551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102551
24.
24. Mascadri, J., Brownlee, J. L., Johansson, E., Scholes, L., Walker, S., & Berthelsen, D. (2021). Children’s perspectives on why and when teachers listen to their ideas: Exploring opportunities for participation in the early years of school. International Journal of Educational Research, 107, 101747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101747
25.
25. Branigan, H. E., Donaldson, D. I. (2020). Teachers matter for metacognition: Facilitating metacognition in the primary school through teacher-pupil interactions. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100718