Home Releases 17(2)

MULTIDIMENSIONAL-FUNCTIONAL STUDY OF RESPONSIBILITY AS AN INTEGRAL CHARACTERISTIC OF A PERSONALITY THAT MEETS THE CRITERIA OF A NEW IMAGE OF RUSSIA

Psychology , UDC: 378.015.31:17.022.1 DOI: 10.25688/2076-9121.2023.17.2.05

Authors

  • Akhmetvalieva Meyserya Garafovna PhD in Pedagogy
  • Ivanova Elvira A. PhD in Sociology, Associate Professor
  • Tkhugo Muliat M. PhD in Pedagogy

Annotation

In the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation, one of the tasks of state policy is the education of a harmoniously developed and socially responsible citizen (Chapter 4, paragraph 32). Conditions for the dynamic socio-economic, political, cultural reformatting of Russia, the education of the value system of young people, who are the main force in the formation of the conceptual model of the modern image of our state, becomes relevant. Therefore, it is necessary to redirect the system of educating young people into the framework of fulfilling the task of forming responsibility among young people as a guarantor of successful socialization and implementation of building a new image of Russia. In connection with the above, a survey was conducted of students of the Saratov State Conservatory named after L. V. Sobinov of the first and fourth courses, in order to determine their formation of personal characteristics — responsibility. 163 students took part in the survey: 85 people of the 1st year, 78 people of the 4th year. Research objectives: tracing key indicators of integral personality characteristics, in which there is a difference (average value) in freshmen and undergraduates, determining the relationship between correlating traits using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Based on the survey results, their quantitative and qualitative characteristics are formulated.

How to link insert

Akhmetvalieva, M. G., Ivanova, E. A. & Tkhugo, M. M. (2023). MULTIDIMENSIONAL-FUNCTIONAL STUDY OF RESPONSIBILITY AS AN INTEGRAL CHARACTERISTIC OF A PERSONALITY THAT MEETS THE CRITERIA OF A NEW IMAGE OF RUSSIA Bulletin of the Moscow City Pedagogical University. Series "Pedagogy and Psychology", 17(2), 94. https://doi.org/10.25688/2076-9121.2023.17.2.05
References
1. 1. Hidayah, R. (2021). Students’ Self-Adjustment, Self-Control, and Morality. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 12(1), 174–193.
2. 2. Alieva, S. A., Bilalov, M. K., Gadzhiev, R. D., Radzhabova, R. V., & Salmanova, D. A. (2018). Pedagogical technology for identifying the level of patriotism formation in Senior school students within actualization of social commitment and initiative. Journal of Social Studies Education, 9(2), 329–348. https://doi.org/10.17499/jsser.92763
3. 3. Egorychev, A. M., Mardakhaev, L. V., & Akhtyan, A. G. (2019). Spiritual and Moral Meanings and Values of the Russian Culture as a Basis for the National and Civil Consciousness Upbringing in the Russian Youth. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(4), 470–489.
4. 4. Vinogradova, N. A., & Zharkikh, E. V. (n. d.). Goal setting of social development at the planetary, national and regional levels. (In Russ.). https://bstudy.net/633073/sotsiologiya/gumanitarnye_aspekty_ustoychivogo_razvitiya_rossii?ysclid=ldkamc18cj493644912
5. 5. Muzdybaev, K. (2010). Psychology of responsibility (Edited by V. E. Semenov. (In Russ.).
6. 6. Osipova, N. G., Elishev, S. O., Pronchev, G. B., & Monakhov, D. N. (2018). Social and Political Portrait of Contemporary Russian Student Youth. Journal of Social Studies Education, 9(1), 28–59. https://doi.org/10.17499/jsser.12152
7. 7. Konyaeva, M. A., & Akhmetvalieva, M. G. (2020). Education of health-saving culture among musicians in the context of personal security. Modern high-tech technologies, 9, 157–161. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17513/snt.38233
8. 8. Lomov, B. F. (1999). Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology. Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Psychology. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.).
9. 9. Timofeicheva, V. A. (2008). Responsibility as a systemic quality of personality and its essential features. Bulletin of the RUDN, Psychology and Pedagogy series, 3, 39–43. (In Russ.).
10. 10. Vorontsov, A. V., & Subetto, A. I. (2021). Reporting and scientific reports at the XI Congress of the Petrovsky Academy of Sciences and Arts “Science and education in ensuring sustainable development of Russia”. Saint-Petersburg: Scientific Asterion. (In Russ.).
11. 11. Alfita, L., Kadiyono A., L., Nguyen, P. T., Firdaus, W., & Wekke, I. S. (2019). Educating the External Conditions in the Educational and Cultural Environment. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(8), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n8p34
12. 12. García-Moriyón, F., González-Lamas, J., Botella, J., González, V. J., Miranda-Alonso, T., Palacios, A., & Robles-Loro, R. (2020). Research in Moral Education: The Contribution of P4C to the Moral Growth of Students. Education Sciences, 10(119). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10040119
13. 13. Snow, N. E. (2018). Positive psychology, the classification of character strengths and virtues, and issues of measurement. J. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/:10.1080/17439760.2018.1528376
14. 14. Yan, S., Walters, L., & Wang, Z. (2018). Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Philosophy for Children Programs on Students’ Cognitive Outcomes. Anal. Teach. Philos. Prax, 39, 13–33.
15. 15. Bidova, B. B. (2016). The specifics of the formation of responsible behavior among modern students of higher educational institutions. Education and upbringing, 1(6), 94–96. (In Russ.)
16. 16. Krupnov, A. I. (2007). System diagnostics and correction of sociability. Monograph. Moscow: Russian University of Friendship of Peoples. (In Russ.). https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000199_000009_003143317/?ysclid=lanuz1ptq7822800244
17. 17. Pankina, E. V. (2011). On the question of understanding personal responsibility in humanistic psychology. Pedagogy and Psychology of Education, 3, 72–78. (In Russ.).
18. 18. Gubachev, M. N. (2021). Personal and social responsibility of students: analysis of problems and ways of regulating the relationship of an individual with himself and society. International Scientific Research Journal, 7(109), 81–84. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2021.109.7.085
19. 19. Krichevets, A. N., Korneev, A. A., & Rasskazova, E. I. (2019). Fundamentals of statistics for psychologists. M.: Acropolis. (In Russ.).
20. 20. Heritov, A. D. (2004). Mathematical methods of psychological research, analysis and interpretation of data. (In Russ.). https://fileskachat.com/file/61960_8d22171b56a964cd7d9dfcd2ed38e931.html
21. 21. Assagioli, R. (1994). Psychosynthesis: theory and practice: From a mental crisis to a higher Self. Moscow. (In Russ.).
Download file .pdf 477.36 kb